dieseldave wrote:
OK,I know that shutter speed, f-stop and iso together are supposed to combine to give you the perfect exposure (perfect being a relative term) But when shooting in manual mode where do you start? example, if I want a narrow depth of field I should set aperture low like 6.5. To avoid over exposure I suppose shutter speed would have to be pretty fast. Where would iso come in? And where do you start for other situations like portraits?
photo1:iso 6400, ss 1/200, f/16
photo2:iso 6400, ss 1/250, f/25
photo3:iso 2000 ss 1/250, f/25
photo4:iso 6400, ss 1/400, f/8
OK,I know that shutter speed, f-stop and iso toget... (
show quote)
Dave,
What I do is normally shoot at the lowest ISO that will let me get a clean, relatively noise-free image, using the aperture that gives me the depth of field I want, and a shutter speed that will keep my image free of blur from movement in the subject or camera.
If shooting a static subject and the camera is on a tripod in daylight and I am using a wide angle lens - ISO 100 is a good starting ISO, with the aperture whatever you need to record the DoF you want. If you are shooting landscapes on a windless day, or city scapes, etc, you can go to around F11 or F16, and let the shutter speed fall where it may to get a good exposure.
If I am shooting portraits in a studio setting, and I have complete control over the lighting, and I am looking for a dramatic effect where the DoF is very shallow, I will choose a short telephoto lens - 85mm up to 200mm. In this case longer lenses generally provide a more flattering "look" by flattening the perspective a bit. While it is true that at the same distance the DoF is exactly the same regardless of focal length, when you move back to frame the image with a longer lens you change the DoF, which is where the flattening comes into play. Again, you are looking for a low noise image so a wide aperture, low ISO and reasonably fast shutter speed, around 1/200 or shorter if hand held, maybe as long as 1/160 if hand held. Here you'd want to freeze any subject movement and also any movement from the camera.
If I am shooting an outdoor sporting event, like a high school soccer game, here the weight on the exposure triangle goes to shutter speed, followed by aperture and finally ISO. Shutter speed should be 1/500 sec or shorter. The closer you are to the action and the longer your focal length, the shorter the shutter speed needs to be to freeze the action. If you are looking to record some blur to provide the perception of movement, which can be very effective if done correctly, you can use a slightly longer shutter speed than you would normally.
So, since I can't see your images, I would likely think that they must be pretty noisy, unless you added an extra zero to your ISO settings as you list them in your post.
Another rule of thumb, with digital cameras, a phenomenon known as diffraction begins to diminish contrast and resolution. The smaller the aperture, the softer your images will end up being. Up to F16, or F11 with Micro 4/3 cameras, you can recover some of that loss of sharpness in post processing.
I think what you are implying here, is a solid way to determine exposure, not what the relationship is between the three parameters particularly when working with manual exposure.
I generally shoot manual, but I have my camera set up to be able to quickly change any one of the three parameters without needing to take my eye off the viewfinder. In fact, I use the information displayed in the viewfinder's informational display to help me arrive at the correct settings. I can see the focus point confirmation, and if my exposure is on the money, high or low, and what my camera exposure settings are.
For the most part, I expose to the right - by this I mean I set my exposure as high as possible, while still avoiding the loss of highlight detail, aka blown highlights. I have a button on the camera set to show me the histogram of the image I just took. Exposing to the right just means that the distribution of data in the image comes very close to the right edge of the graph, but not touching it. There are some exceptions, of course - like specular highlights coming off waves when shooting water scenes with the sun in front of you, or scenes at night, where the lights are also in the picture - in these two cases it is generally considered ok to allow no detail in the highlights, and the histogram will show the data creeping up the right side. As long as the rest of the image is exposed correctly, this is generally ok.
So all of this begs the question - what is the best metering mode to use? I use the spot meter function in my camera - which limits the are read by the meter to 1.5% of the total image frame. This allows me to be very selective with what I meter. To make sure I don't go over and blow important highlights, I have determined that if I read the highlights, then apply a setting that is 1-2/3 stops higher than the straight reading (higher ISO, longer shutter, and/or wider aperture), my highlights will be right at the threshold of overexposure, but only at the lowest ISO. When I push the ISO higher, the lower dynamic range requires that use less of an adjustment, since the dynamic range or the ability of the camera to record highlight and shadows is diminished. All of this is covered under an exposure evaluation system known as the Zone System.
As opposed to the many recommendations to get Understanding Exposure, Peterson's book dances around but never discusses how to arrive at the correct exposure - the actual mechanism, or how the zone system works - which is at the core of how to get a good exposure. So, I will recommend that you go to the library and read his book, but do spend some time looking at the following websites which deal with the zone system in detail.
http://www.outdoorphotographer.com/tips-techniques/nature-landscapes/the-digital-zone-system/http://clickitupanotch.com/2013/01/zone-system-the-basics/http://www.normankoren.com/zonesystem.htmlhttp://f164.com/the-zone-system-for-digital/10/2011/http://www.alanrossphotography.com/category/tech/zonesystemandmetering/http://laurencekim.com/spot-metering-portrait-photography/http://digital-photography-school.com/how-to-use-the-zone-system-to-learn-about-metering-and-exposure-compensation/This is a lot to digest, but if you take your time you'll get through the material, along with testing how your camera works and how to best set it up for the type of shooting you do - and most important - why it works this way.
Gary's advice is right on the money as is oldtigger's advice to shoot a test shot to see what the camera does, and use it's settings as a starting point.
It does sound like you are ready to explore manual exposure, but I wouldn't use it for a paying job just yet. Take lots of test shots at different settings, it will all begin to make sense soon enough.
Hope this helps.