denoferth wrote:
I agree neither candidate is ideal but one is so tainted, so corrupt and flawed as to defy all logic. The next president WILL affect the future of our country for the foreseeable future by their appointments to the Supreme Court. Everything else is secondary. America was and is unique as the grand experiment still feared and hated by kings and despots alike who have been working openly and covertly since her inception to bring her down. This election is the closest the international cartels, communists and, yes, Islamic fundamentalist have come so far to succeeding. Because the corruption pendulum has swung so far to the left I feel a radical outsider candidate like Trump is necessary to restore some semblance of balance. That is if he can manage to win the election AND not be murdered soon after by those who demand they retain control at all costs. That being said it never fails to amaze me when democrats are somehow able to overlook a sitting Secretary of State, whose husband scored unprecedented speaking fees from Russian bankers immediately after she negotiated trade agreements for American uranium mining rights with a Canadian company immediately sold to Putin’s Russian buddies. These same naive democrats are able to somehow miss the significance of that same Secretary of State conducting official state department business, guaranteed to be extremely prejudicial to the security of the United States, on an illegal and unsecured private server in order to evade the freedom of Information Act. Are even willing to overlook or too ignorant of procedure to realize the significance that she chose to converse on that unsecured server in foreign lands filled with listening posts and with individuals from Obama to many with no security clearance whatsoever on topics with classifications from above top secret to confidential! We’re expected to believe they’re seemingly too inept to recognize that she was the originator of those same messages and not be aware even her own schedule would have been classified. They are able to ignore the family run business, masquerading as a charity that contributes many of the millions it rakes in from foreign contributors with the worst human rights records but with the most to gain from a Clinton presidency back into the Clinton’s coffers through innumerable ghost cooperation’s. Maybe that falls under the heading of how else do you think a politician suddenly becomes filthy rich after supposedly leaving office “totally broke” but you can’t prove a thing as usual. Hammers away at Trump about his alleged Russian connections but DID negotiate the treaty that resulted in the majority of America’s uranium supply ending up in Russian hands, HAS been endorsed by the ☭ Communist Party of the United States☭ and DID accept a $10 million campaign contribution from the ex-Nazi and major supporter George Soros. Are so blinded by the leftist corruption now infesting our government they refuse to acknowledge the “honorable” head of the FBI has been quite obviously compromised or, worse yet, terrified of going up against the Obama appointed “Justice Department”. A justice department that is discovered secretly meeting with the spouse of the person of interest and still nothing is done because the rot starts at the head and everyone knows it but is too afraid to admit it because they know what it would mean. THIS is the career politician they want to hand the nuclear codes to? Really? Remember, all you hypocritical boy scouts pretending you never had a “dirty” thought about the ladies, Trump engaged in “locker room talk” and was secretly recorded a decade ago by someone who ratted him out to the Clinton News Network; he didn’t rape, sexually assault or take advantage of young interns like Hillary’s husband ACTUALLY DID while holding office. I hear democrats invoking our founding fathers and they are correct that they would already be shooting by now but they are also forgetting it would be they who would be lined up against the wall as the traitors they have become. Throw away you vote if you must but every vote not cast goes to the opposition. Every vote cast for a third party candidate with no chance of winning goes to the opposing candidate. Remember, it was Vladimir Lennon who described all those ideological zealots who demonstrated for their own demise at the beginning of the Soviet Revolution without even releasing it as “useful idiots”. They were were politically correct too.
I agree neither candidate is ideal but one is so t... (
show quote)
Great post, you have knowledge and insight, very refreshing to see on this forum. Thank You.