Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
which is better?
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Oct 6, 2016 07:56:39   #
fosgood11 Loc: oil city, La.
 
one with flash and one without

without
without...
(Download)

with
with...
(Download)

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:00:04   #
TomC. Loc: Bel Air, MD
 
fosgood11 wrote:
one with flash and one without


Without!

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:04:58   #
cabunit Loc: SE Connecticut
 
Bring me my slippers! Cute.

Well, "better" is one of those words. As a photo, I much prefer the one without flash. Looks much more natural, and if you want, you can pull up the shadows in Lightroom or Photoshop. However, it's really up to you, and what you were looking for.

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 6, 2016 08:10:34   #
fosgood11 Loc: oil city, La.
 
thanks Tom
TomC. wrote:
Without!

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:12:33   #
fosgood11 Loc: oil city, La.
 
thanks for your input
cabunit wrote:
Bring me my slippers! Cute.

Well, "better" is one of those words. As a photo, I much prefer the one without flash. Looks much more natural, and if you want, you can pull up the shadows in Lightroom or Photoshop. However, it's really up to you, and what you were looking for.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:15:25   #
Canon Cocker
 
I like the one with the flash. There is more detail and definition in the dogs fir. The shine on the floor in the photo without the flash is distracting.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:16:40   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
fosgood11 wrote:
one with flash and one without

the flash of course

Reply
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Oct 6, 2016 08:20:08   #
fosgood11 Loc: oil city, La.
 
thanks Cannon
Canon Cocker wrote:
I like the one with the flash. There is more detail and definition in the dogs fir. The shine on the floor in the photo without the flash is distracting.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:29:55   #
Kmgw9v Loc: Miami, Florida
 
More definition with the flash makes it better.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:33:03   #
WayneT Loc: Paris, TN
 
I prefer with flash for many of the same reasons mentioned above.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:35:34   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
The flash did what it is was suppose to do. Defeat darkness.

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Oct 6, 2016 08:48:14   #
tshift Loc: Overland Park, KS.
 
fosgood11 wrote:
one with flash and one without


Definitely the one with flash, fills in all shadows and smooths all the colors.

Tom

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:51:48   #
camerapapi Loc: Miami, Fl.
 
I prefer the one without flash. I usually cut the flash light by at least one stop for subjects like this one to make it look more natural. In this particular case the light is too harsh.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 08:53:47   #
angler Loc: StHelens England
 
Flash for me Donald,nice shot.

Reply
Oct 6, 2016 09:27:37   #
fosgood11 Loc: oil city, La.
 
thanks
Kmgw9v wrote:
More definition with the flash makes it better.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.