jerryc41 wrote:
Whew! That's a relief! Now if we can only get a few thousand more next generation fighters, bombers, bombs, and missiles, we'll be almost totally safe. We have to support all these mom and pop operations that are producing our weapons. They are protecting us, so we have to keep throwing money at them.
With all the impressive weapons we have, we haven't won a war since 1945. We have been fighting a losing battle against "improvised" weapons in the middle east.
One of the reasons we haven't won the past few conflicts is that politicians got in the way of winning wars. In WW2 America fought that war to win at any cost. We bombed the living crap out of our enemies, we killed millions of them and we lost a lot of our military fighting men and women. Our goal though was to win at any cost. Now, due to politicians going back and forth, we only PLAY at war. If we seriously wanted to win in the Middle East, with the coalition we have with other countries, and with a leader (we have none now) we could bomb the daylights out of ISIS. Would there be collateral damage just like in every war? Of course there would be. But in a short time ISIS and other Muslim terrorist groups would be tired of death and destruction in their country and would be happy to surrender. America's goody two shoes politicians refuse to go along with winning because they don't want America to look like the aggressor even though it was America who was attacked.