Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Too Slim?
Aug 8, 2016 11:44:54 #
I do not think she is too thin and as a matter of fact ,she is quite lovely. I really like the first image but the last ,while well done,is weird.
Aug 8, 2016 13:19:29 #
Number 3 doesn't appeal to me, but there's nothing wrong with it. As a matter of fact, it's nicely done. The first two are excellent. Her body-type is perfectly suited to the implied aboriginal look you went for, and achieved, in the first image; her natural beauty shows through in your sensitively composed portrait. I think it's an excellent set.
Aug 8, 2016 19:38:26 #
Tom G wrote:
If ya gotta ask, you wouldn't understand the answer.
So, you don't know either?
Check out Bridge Camera Show Case section of our forum.
Aug 8, 2016 21:17:14 #
Thank you all for your comments. She was fun to work with, and a good day shooting. I'm happy for her success and I wish her the best. One day she may have nothing to do and will give me a call. (sniffle)
Aug 8, 2016 22:53:53 #
The first nude shoot I did was with a model who had never done one before. We ended up doing about a half a dozen shoots together. Now she charges so much she is out of my comfort zone. I'm happy for her, sad for me.
Aug 9, 2016 08:09:43 #
buckwheat wrote:
Thank you all for your comments. She was fun to work with, and a good day shooting. I'm happy for her success and I wish her the best. One day she may have nothing to do and will give me a call. (sniffle)
She looks like a nice girl and will remember who launched her ......no need to cry just yet !
Aug 12, 2016 11:37:03 #
too fat, too thin, whats the difference? we are here for photography not to rate models. with that said, I dont like her hands in pic 2, looks like claws instead of fingers.
then #3, Im not sure if I hate it or love it, it certainly is different.
then #3, Im not sure if I hate it or love it, it certainly is different.
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Sep 26, 2016 03:14:18 #
Love the picture of this gal. She is what I call a natural beauty that is worth taking the time to photograph. Let us see more of her.
Sep 27, 2016 07:15:05 #
she photographs well, you could have left the " too skinny" out and just let us enjoy the images.
Oct 2, 2016 16:48:00 #
bdk wrote:
too fat, too thin, whats the difference? we are here for photography not to rate models. with that said, I dont like her hands in pic 2, looks like claws instead of fingers.
then #3, Im not sure if I hate it or love it, it certainly is different.
then #3, Im not sure if I hate it or love it, it certainly is different.
I agree wholeheartedly. She has a classic ectomorph body type and is really quite beautiful. Part of the joy of photography is learning to "see," not just to "look," and surely a big part of that is learning to shed the influence of our society's limited, judgmental values on feminine beauty that victimize so many women and appreciate many types and looks.
I also agree with other posts saying that titling the post "Too Slim?" was an invitation to bring out the worst in comments, though I'm sure that wasn't the intent.
Back to the photos--I really like number one. Kind of an intense, primitive look. Almost like "Street Photography" in the wild. Number three is creepy. I hope you'll post more of her. Thanks for these.
Oct 6, 2016 12:21:24 #
She looks like a very nice person. I liked the fist two shots....the third one makes her look very creepy.Just my opinion.
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Oct 6, 2016 16:51:16 #
Oct 7, 2016 06:25:03 #
lukan
Loc: Chicago, IL
Frank T wrote:
Gee, I thought this section was about nude photography but it turns out it's about old men body shaming women.
Go figure.
Go figure.
Not really at all.
Oct 7, 2016 17:15:48 #
You might want to elaborate.
Streets wrote:
Because it's CRAP!
Oct 7, 2016 17:24:32 #
buckwheat wrote:
You might want to elaborate.
Your first two shots were really nice. The third was really awful. I like women too much, I guess. That type of photo manipulation is not art and does little to show the beauty of the nude woman. Two out of three is a .667 batting average if you want to look at the bright side.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.