Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Gallery
Day 148 - Photo A Day Challenge - 5-27-2012
Page <<first <prev 22 of 24 next> last>>
May 28, 2012 19:07:13   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
jim_j_canuck wrote:
Del Crary Park


Very very nice Jim

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:09:47   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
aleone63 wrote:
photogrl57 wrote:
Welcome to Day 148 :)
Today we are going to attempt Night Photography. Minimum 1 second exposures. :)


Went to a wildlife sanctury today... what fun and I have been patiently waiting for it to get dark so I could do todays challenge... here is what I came up with


Very nice aleone... I did not even try for a night shot... by the time night came I was too tired to move...

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:11:42   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
Goddess97633 wrote:
It's dark!!! I just took this....

Squirrels haven't got them yet!!!


Cool shot.... sprinkle a little garlic powder on ground.. don't think squirrels like it!!!

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2012 19:12:37   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
Mabarker wrote:
This is the first chance I have had to sit down and post something...the yard is keeping me busy and tired! Here are some from the archives.


Very nice shots Ma.... love the moon shot with the kids.

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:16:57   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
[quote=SUSIE Q]
photogrl57 wrote:
Welcome to Day 148 :) Sorry if I've been preoccupied these last few days y'all .. I've been very busy and no time for anything .. especially me lol. Saturday was just hectic all day .. so when I went out to shoot for today .. of course nothing turned out .. so my examples are sub par .. but they are all I have.
Today we are going to attempt Night Photography. Minimum 1 second exposures. For these examples I tried to use shutter priority ..but ended up using manual settings... which is why the focus is off too ...I just don't see well at night...and auto focus wouldn't stop adjusting itself .. LOL. So here are what I got..such as they are..I sure hope you have better luck than I did:)

Hello Everyone:
Here are a few from archives...
Have a great day-or should I say night?
Susie Q
Welcome to Day 148 :) Sorry if I've been preoccupi... (show quote)


Very very nice SusieQ

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:23:33   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
hamtrack wrote:
The Alcan Highway to Alaska is a ride. Don't take any apples when you cross into Canada. You either eat them on US soil or the Canadian Border Patrol will eat them later, but they were very nice about it.


Really nice shots Hamtrack

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:25:52   #
Teri O Loc: California
 
catgirl wrote:
trying to take sign as it moved around, other taken from bridge at NY NY casino


Good shots Catgirl... love your Buffalo Bills sign. I tried to take one last week from 14th floor at Whiskey Pete's but just could not get the right angle and unfortunately our room window was incredibly dirty.....guess their "window man" hadn't been there in a few days...

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2012 19:40:30   #
catgirl Loc: las vegas
 
Teri O wrote:
catgirl wrote:
trying to take sign as it moved around, other taken from bridge at NY NY casino


Good shots Catgirl... love your Buffalo Bills sign. I tried to take one last week from 14th floor at Whiskey Pete's but just could not get the right angle and unfortunately our room window was incredibly dirty.....guess their "window man" hadn't been there in a few days...


thank you Teri O, I was in the parking lot

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:43:49   #
bludogge Loc: Planet Earth
 
Some really great work everyone.



Reply
May 28, 2012 19:46:42   #
pjreed Loc: Tonopah, Arizona
 
Night photos at Phoenix International Raceway

Setting sun
Setting sun...

Victory lane the night before the races
Victory lane the night before the races...

The long skinny pedal on the right, push it all of the way down and keep it there.
The long skinny pedal on the right, push it all of...

Reply
May 28, 2012 19:52:53   #
loguey Loc: Osteen FL
 
Jer thanks so much i'v been having a terriable time with my 70-300 soom i was thinking that a 300 my lense wasn't sharp it was blured and seemed to have a soft halow around the image.. it sometimes can be corrected with sharpining but i'm i don't think that is correct... so i'm going to try to turn off the IS to see if it helps here are some examples of what i mean... thats again... [quote=Jer]I agree with your comments. High ISO can give the appearance that the focus isn't correct. One other note and usually applies to moving objects but might apply to stationary objects also. If your camera has image stabilization (IS) you might want to turn it off and use a tripod. Also, don't use IS with a tripod. I've run into problems using IS with a 300mm lens. I also tested the IS with fast moving objects using a high speed shutter and the moving objects appeared blurred but taking it off (still hand held) they were sharp. I'm a photojournalist and I can't always carry a tripod.
Bet you didn't know that photography could be so complicated?

Bushido wrote:
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional information to Jer's comments. In looking at your images some seem a little soft however I can not determine whether it is do to focus or movement. Normally if a subject is out of focus in a photograph something else in the photograph is in focus. In the case of the close-up of the mansion's front at dusk it seems the total image is soft. This could be do to the lack of sharpening in PP or camera shake, even a high ISO could cause this. I would have to know more detail as to how the image was taken.

Now as for more information on focusing. Give me a day or two to put some images together that will illustrate the 1/3 -2/3 rule. I will send you a message to look on this thread when it is done.

Let me say one other thing. With the advent of auto everything on a camera it is easy for the operator to ignore the basic fundamental of photography and still get acceptable images. However, if a person doesn't know what the camera is doing and why, it becomes difficult to compensate for the auto's short comings, of which there are many. Those who do learn will achieve a greater number of wonderful images.

Have a great day and I will be back two you soon.
SUSIE Q wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enchanting. Being a B&W man I love the mansion, it is exposed beautifully. One tip on focus. There is a rule of thumb that's called 1/3,2/3 rule; if your depth of field is 9ft. total and your subject is at 12ft then every thing from the 9ft mark(1/3 in front of the subject) to the 18ft mark (2/3 in back of the subject) will be in focus. Many time in low lighting situations I have been able to pace off the distance, or in the case of table top work measure it and come out with great images. However it means knowing your lens and the depth of fields at each f-stop. This rule also is true with auto focus. Again great shots.

SUSIE
Hello Everyone:
Here are a few from archives...
Have a great day-or should I say night?
Susie Q[/quote wrote:


Bushido,
Thank you SO much for taking the time to talk about focus. Most likely, if I need to hear it, so will someone else. There are people of varied experience and knowledge of photography in our audience...this is the beauty of this forum. As we participate, whether just reading or adding our photos we have the potential to make ourselves better.
So, in view of this, please if you could be so kind, to be just a bit more specific in talking about focus. Could you please take one or more of my photos and talk in detail about how they could have been better/worse, etc....perhaps applying the 1/3,2/3 rule. I would so appreciate it !
All the best,
Susie Q
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enc... (show quote)
quote=Bushido Susie Q......The images are wonderf... (show quote)
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional i... (show quote)

notice the halow around the bird and the wire.. so i'm going to try turing off the IS
notice the halow around the bird and the wire.. so...

Reply
 
 
May 28, 2012 20:00:37   #
Peanut Loc: St Augustine, Fl
 
[quote=Bushido]Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional information to Jer's comments. In looking at your images some seem a little soft however I can not determine whether it is do to focus or movement. Normally if a subject is out of focus in a photograph something else in the photograph is in focus. In the case of the close-up of the mansion's front at dusk it seems the total image is soft. This could be do to the lack of sharpening in PP or camera shake, even a high ISO could cause this. I would have to know more detail as to how the image was taken.

Now as for more information on focusing. Give me a day or two to put some images together that will illustrate the 1/3 -2/3 rule. I will send you a message to look on this thread when it is done.

Let me say one other thing. With the advent of auto everything on a camera it is easy for the operator to ignore the basic fundamental of photography and still get acceptable images. However, if a person doesn't know what the camera is doing and why, it becomes difficult to compensate for the auto's short comings, of which there are many. Those who do learn will achieve a greater number of wonderful images.

Have a great day and I will be back two you soon.
SUSIE Q wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enchanting. Being a B&W man I love the mansion, it is exposed beautifully. One tip on focus. There is a rule of thumb that's called 1/3,2/3 rule; if your depth of field is 9ft. total and your subject is at 12ft then every thing from the 9ft mark(1/3 in front of the subject) to the 18ft mark (2/3 in back of the subject) will be in focus. Many time in low lighting situations I have been able to pace off the distance, or in the case of table top work measure it and come out with great images. However it means knowing your lens and the depth of fields at each f-stop. This rule also is true with auto focus. Again great shots.

SUSIE
Hello Everyone:
Here are a few from archives...
Have a great day-or should I say night?
Susie Q[/quote wrote:


Bushido,
Thank you SO much for taking the time to talk about focus. Most likely, if I need to hear it, so will someone else. There are people of varied experience and knowledge of photography in our audience...this is the beauty of this forum. As we participate, whether just reading or adding our photos we have the potential to make ourselves better.
So, in view of this, please if you could be so kind, to be just a bit more specific in talking about focus. Could you please take one or more of my photos and talk in detail about how they could have been better/worse, etc....perhaps applying the 1/3,2/3 rule. I would so appreciate it !
All the best,
Susie Q
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enc... (show quote)
quote=Bushido Susie Q......The images are wonderf... (show quote)


Would you please include me when you send her the info? Thank you.

Reply
May 28, 2012 21:04:21   #
catgirl Loc: las vegas
 
[quote=Peanut]
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional information to Jer's comments. In looking at your images some seem a little soft however I can not determine whether it is do to focus or movement. Normally if a subject is out of focus in a photograph something else in the photograph is in focus. In the case of the close-up of the mansion's front at dusk it seems the total image is soft. This could be do to the lack of sharpening in PP or camera shake, even a high ISO could cause this. I would have to know more detail as to how the image was taken.

Now as for more information on focusing. Give me a day or two to put some images together that will illustrate the 1/3 -2/3 rule. I will send you a message to look on this thread when it is done.

Let me say one other thing. With the advent of auto everything on a camera it is easy for the operator to ignore the basic fundamental of photography and still get acceptable images. However, if a person doesn't know what the camera is doing and why, it becomes difficult to compensate for the auto's short comings, of which there are many. Those who do learn will achieve a greater number of wonderful images.

Have a great day and I will be back two you soon.
SUSIE Q wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enchanting. Being a B&W man I love the mansion, it is exposed beautifully. One tip on focus. There is a rule of thumb that's called 1/3,2/3 rule; if your depth of field is 9ft. total and your subject is at 12ft then every thing from the 9ft mark(1/3 in front of the subject) to the 18ft mark (2/3 in back of the subject) will be in focus. Many time in low lighting situations I have been able to pace off the distance, or in the case of table top work measure it and come out with great images. However it means knowing your lens and the depth of fields at each f-stop. This rule also is true with auto focus. Again great shots.

SUSIE
Hello Everyone:
Here are a few from archives...
Have a great day-or should I say night?
Susie Q[/quote wrote:


Bushido,
Thank you SO much for taking the time to talk about focus. Most likely, if I need to hear it, so will someone else. There are people of varied experience and knowledge of photography in our audience...this is the beauty of this forum. As we participate, whether just reading or adding our photos we have the potential to make ourselves better.
So, in view of this, please if you could be so kind, to be just a bit more specific in talking about focus. Could you please take one or more of my photos and talk in detail about how they could have been better/worse, etc....perhaps applying the 1/3,2/3 rule. I would so appreciate it !
All the best,
Susie Q
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enc... (show quote)
quote=Bushido Susie Q......The images are wonderf... (show quote)


Would you please include me when you send her the info? Thank you.
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional i... (show quote)


me too please

Reply
May 28, 2012 21:12:45   #
Bushido Loc: No Where and Every Where
 
I will also let Peanut and Catgirl know when they are posted.
[quote=catgirl]
Peanut wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional information to Jer's comments. In looking at your images some seem a little soft however I can not determine whether it is do to focus or movement. Normally if a subject is out of focus in a photograph something else in the photograph is in focus. In the case of the close-up of the mansion's front at dusk it seems the total image is soft. This could be do to the lack of sharpening in PP or camera shake, even a high ISO could cause this. I would have to know more detail as to how the image was taken.

Now as for more information on focusing. Give me a day or two to put some images together that will illustrate the 1/3 -2/3 rule. I will send you a message to look on this thread when it is done.

Let me say one other thing. With the advent of auto everything on a camera it is easy for the operator to ignore the basic fundamental of photography and still get acceptable images. However, if a person doesn't know what the camera is doing and why, it becomes difficult to compensate for the auto's short comings, of which there are many. Those who do learn will achieve a greater number of wonderful images.

Have a great day and I will be back two you soon.
SUSIE Q wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enchanting. Being a B&W man I love the mansion, it is exposed beautifully. One tip on focus. There is a rule of thumb that's called 1/3,2/3 rule; if your depth of field is 9ft. total and your subject is at 12ft then every thing from the 9ft mark(1/3 in front of the subject) to the 18ft mark (2/3 in back of the subject) will be in focus. Many time in low lighting situations I have been able to pace off the distance, or in the case of table top work measure it and come out with great images. However it means knowing your lens and the depth of fields at each f-stop. This rule also is true with auto focus. Again great shots.

SUSIE
Hello Everyone:
Here are a few from archives...
Have a great day-or should I say night?
Susie Q[/quote wrote:


Bushido,
Thank you SO much for taking the time to talk about focus. Most likely, if I need to hear it, so will someone else. There are people of varied experience and knowledge of photography in our audience...this is the beauty of this forum. As we participate, whether just reading or adding our photos we have the potential to make ourselves better.
So, in view of this, please if you could be so kind, to be just a bit more specific in talking about focus. Could you please take one or more of my photos and talk in detail about how they could have been better/worse, etc....perhaps applying the 1/3,2/3 rule. I would so appreciate it !
All the best,
Susie Q
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enc... (show quote)
quote=Bushido Susie Q......The images are wonderf... (show quote)


Would you please include me when you send her the info? Thank you.
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional i... (show quote)


me too please
quote=Bushido Susie Q.... my comments were given ... (show quote)

Reply
May 28, 2012 21:35:06   #
Peanut Loc: St Augustine, Fl
 
[quote=Bushido]I will also let Peanut and Catgirl know when they are posted.
catgirl wrote:
Peanut wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional information to Jer's comments. In looking at your images some seem a little soft however I can not determine whether it is do to focus or movement. Normally if a subject is out of focus in a photograph something else in the photograph is in focus. In the case of the close-up of the mansion's front at dusk it seems the total image is soft. This could be do to the lack of sharpening in PP or camera shake, even a high ISO could cause this. I would have to know more detail as to how the image was taken.

Now as for more information on focusing. Give me a day or two to put some images together that will illustrate the 1/3 -2/3 rule. I will send you a message to look on this thread when it is done.

Let me say one other thing. With the advent of auto everything on a camera it is easy for the operator to ignore the basic fundamental of photography and still get acceptable images. However, if a person doesn't know what the camera is doing and why, it becomes difficult to compensate for the auto's short comings, of which there are many. Those who do learn will achieve a greater number of wonderful images.

Have a great day and I will be back two you soon.
SUSIE Q wrote:
Bushido wrote:
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enchanting. Being a B&W man I love the mansion, it is exposed beautifully. One tip on focus. There is a rule of thumb that's called 1/3,2/3 rule; if your depth of field is 9ft. total and your subject is at 12ft then every thing from the 9ft mark(1/3 in front of the subject) to the 18ft mark (2/3 in back of the subject) will be in focus. Many time in low lighting situations I have been able to pace off the distance, or in the case of table top work measure it and come out with great images. However it means knowing your lens and the depth of fields at each f-stop. This rule also is true with auto focus. Again great shots.

SUSIE
Hello Everyone:
Here are a few from archives...
Have a great day-or should I say night?
Susie Q[/quote wrote:


Bushido,
Thank you SO much for taking the time to talk about focus. Most likely, if I need to hear it, so will someone else. There are people of varied experience and knowledge of photography in our audience...this is the beauty of this forum. As we participate, whether just reading or adding our photos we have the potential to make ourselves better.
So, in view of this, please if you could be so kind, to be just a bit more specific in talking about focus. Could you please take one or more of my photos and talk in detail about how they could have been better/worse, etc....perhaps applying the 1/3,2/3 rule. I would so appreciate it !
All the best,
Susie Q
Susie Q......The images are wonderful and very enc... (show quote)
quote=Bushido Susie Q......The images are wonderf... (show quote)


Would you please include me when you send her the info? Thank you.
Susie Q.... my comments were given as additional i... (show quote)


me too please
quote=Bushido Susie Q.... my comments were given ... (show quote)
quote=Peanut quote=Bushido Susie Q.... my commen... (show quote)


Thank you!!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 22 of 24 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.