It has finally dawned on me how to make Adobe Lightroom and DxO work well together!
JimH123 wrote:
Yes, DxO 11 is out, and I am using it.
Also, after send the image to DxO, you only need to hit the "Export to Lightroom" from DxO to send it back to Lightroom, and no need to generate a DNG file.
One quick note on DxO. Prime Noise removal likes to work on the RAW image first. And I find that Lightroom does not seem to send the current changes to DxO, but instead sends the RAW file. When it is returned to Lightroom, it comes back as a TIF with the DxO changes. To prove it to myself, I started with a RAW image in Lightroom and drag the exposure all the way down so that the image is really dark. Then I go to Plug In Extras and Transfer the file to DxO. What shows up is the original RAW with no sign of the exposure being pulled all the way down. And I have access to Prime Noise Removal. I make some changes in DxO and then export it back to Lightroom and I get the TIF file with the DxO changes and none of the Lightroom changes, but now ready for Lightroom to do what you want to it.
Yes, DxO 11 is out, and I am using it. br br Also... (
show quote)
That sounds like a good and sensible work flow to me. After you mentioned "DxO 11" to me, I searched for it and downloaded it yesterday. It's great that DxO and LR now work so well together. I think that LR, DxO, and PS each have their individual strengths. It's great that we are able to take advantage of them all by jumping between them. Thank you for explaining your work flow and informing me that DxO 11 is out. They made some significant improvements with this latest improvements.
BTW, I have noticed that sometimes I unexpectedly get the "Ambiguity" message from DxO during export. I found if I go into "Manage DxO modules" and delete my module then download load it again, it clears up the problem. I think DxO must improve their modules now and then, and this is their way of making us update to the latest version.
One of my favorite lens (and I have MANY) is an old Minolta 35~70mm f/4 film lens with a manual macro mode. I use it on my Sony camera bodies. This lens is so sharp that I find no real need for a correcting module! You can buy this lens all day long on eBay for $20! A real bargain for Sony users. I wish DxO provided a correction module for this old lens, but because DxO is part of my work flow I still sometimes pass images taken with this lens through DxO.
Davethehiker wrote:
That sounds like a good and sensible work flow to me. After you mentioned "DxO 11" to me, I searched for it and downloaded it yesterday. It's great that DxO and LR now work so well together. I think that LR, DxO, and PS each have their individual strengths. It's great that we are able to take advantage of them all by jumping between them. Thank you for explaining your work flow and informing me that DxO 11 is out. They made some significant improvements with this latest improvements.
BTW, I have noticed that sometimes I unexpectedly get the "Ambiguity" message from DxO during export. I found if I go into "Manage DxO modules" and delete my module then download load it again, it clears up the problem. I think DxO must improve their modules now and then, and this is their way of making us update to the latest version.
One of my favorite lens (and I have MANY) is an old Minolta 35~70mm f/4 film lens with a manual macro mode. I use it on my Sony camera bodies. This lens is so sharp that I find no real need for a correcting module! You can buy this lens all day long on eBay for $20! A real bargain for Sony users. I wish DxO provided a correction module for this old lens, but because DxO is part of my work flow I still sometimes pass images taken with this lens through DxO.
That sounds like a good and sensible work flow to ... (
show quote)
I have that great lens also. Love it. Even with images of stars, there is not much distortion to deal with at all. Most lenses get worse and worse as you move to the corners, but this one hangs in there quite well.
Beautiful photo (gondola/mountains) and great job processing. Where was the photo taken?
It's been moved to the "Photo Gallery" section. I don't know way I ever try to post anything elsewhere. It seems anything I post ends up here anyway. I thought we were talking about about processing work flow but, what do I know?!
LOL
Peterff
Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
Davethehiker wrote:
It's been moved to the "Photo Gallery" section. I don't know why I ever try to post anything elsewhere. It seems anything I post ends up here anyway. I thought we were talking about about processing work flow but, what do I know?!
LOL
I agree. Moving things is arbitrary and frequently inane, especially taking this post to the photo gallery. Perhaps hedgehogs and large flightless birds aren't quite as smart as we would like to think!
Hi Peter, long time since we corresponded. I'm sure you are watching to see if Sony offers us an A99 replacement next month.
Edit #########
I'm thinking of the wrong "Peter". The one I was thinking of lived in England.
Peterff
Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
Davethehiker wrote:
Hi Peter, long time since we corresponded. I'm sure you are watching to see if Sony offers us an A99 replacement next month.
Hi Dave,
I try to pay attention, and keep abreast of new vendor introductions. It will be very interesting to see what Sony does, as with Canon, Nikon, Pentax and others.
Mostly, I'm still involved in work related technology. Machine and Deep learning keeps me pretty busy right now, which is fascinating but complex.
However, I would be interested in your thoughts when Sony drops a new camera.
Thanks
Peterff
Loc: O'er The Hills and Far Away, in Themyscira.
Davethehiker wrote:
Hi Peter, long time since we corresponded. I'm sure you are watching to see if Sony offers us an A99 replacement next month.
Edit #########
I'm thinking of the wrong "Peter". The one I was thinking of lived in England.
Oops, perhaps I responded too quickly. I did live in England - was born there - but have been in the US since 1991. Anyhow, take good care!
Peterff wrote:
Oops, perhaps I responded too quickly. I did live in England - was born there - but have been in the US since 1991. Anyhow, take good care!
There is more than one "Peter" on UHH who is from England. I was thinking of Peekayoh. He is a big Sony user and like me has a lot invested in Sony full frame lenses. He has given me some very useful information.
Back to the original subject, Dave; In your first set of photos, I can straighten out photos just fine that are even worse, in lightroom with no problem. I do it all of the time. Lol. I do not have any programs such as DxO. I am glad you are liking it.
Tom
tainkc wrote:
Back to the original subject, Dave; In your first set of photos, I can straighten out photos just fine that are even worse, in lightroom with no problem. I do it all of the time. Lol. I do not have any programs such as DxO. I am glad you are liking it.
Tom
If it is just straightening, Lightroom is fine. If it needs perspective adjustment, DxO Viewpoint can do things that Lightroom cannot. Refer to:
http://www.dxo.com/us/photography/photo-software/dxo-viewpoint/featuresWonderful tool when out shooting with a wide angle lens.
Viewpoint works thru DxO Optics and is not a stand-alone program.
You beat me to it. I was about respond with the same remarks. I just returned from a vacation to the Canadian Rockies where I was using a Sony 11~18mm f/4 lens a lot! I also have 12~24mm made by Sigma for my full frame camera. The Sigma lens would be practically useless were it not for the correction modules provided by DxO!
We all develop favorite "go-to" programs and as our skills develop we learn to more and more with each of these programs. I'm still learning LR. I see that it has a Rotate and a crop tool and simple rotation could have been done in LR. As you alluded, I also changed the perspective just a bit.
To my mind LR's strength is keeping track of a large library of photos, assigning and using keyword to find them. I have moved all my photos into LR because of that single feature. LR also offers a lot of other very good and useful tools. I can see why so many people like it. By LR and DxO cooperating as well as they do, they are acknowledging each others strengths and that they complement each other. I think DxO also has some sort of method for keeping track of a library of photos. I never bothered to learn it. Instead, I when with the accepted industry stranded for cataloging photos "LR".
My three go-to photographic tools are LR, PS, and DxO.
If I'm not mistaken there was/is a stand-alone version of "Viewpoint". Somehow I ended up with a free copy of it for a while. Now I just use the tools included in my version of DxO optics pro that do the same thing.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.