Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Have Any of You Purchased Square Trade Protection?
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jul 23, 2016 08:46:25   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
photoman022 wrote:
I've been looking at some cameras on line and I'm considering purchasing one (I know it's grey market); it offers Square Trade for about $60 for three year warranty plus accidents (price included). I never would have considered purchasing such a plan until I took a stumble and trashed my D3100 (it was not under warranty).

My question: Have any of your purchased and USED Square Trade? Is it as good as they claim in the advertisement on Ebay?

This post is for gathering information about the reliability of Square Trade. If you haven't used Square Trade, then please don't respond (that will open up a floodgate!). If you have an opinion of purchasing grey market, please start your own topic about that (which will open another floodgate!).

Thank you for sharing your experiences with Square Trade and helping me make an informed decision (about Square Trade).
I've been looking at some cameras on line and I'm ... (show quote)


Photoman, I have used Square Trade only once when a TV set acted-up. They were prompt in contacting a local reapair person, who came to the house and solved the problem. No complaints at all about Square Trade. They delivered as promised.

Reply
Jul 23, 2016 09:00:55   #
BudsOwl Loc: Upstate NY and New England
 
Jackdoor wrote:
Insurers make money out of customers. I've never in 43 years as an adult been better off for being insured. Therefore I only insure when I legally have to (motor, professional indemnity,) or where if I got it wrong, I could lose a life changing amount of money (so upgrade on the motor insurance in case I rear-end a Ferrari, house buildings and contents insurance.) The only exception is where I can add an item for little or no extra premium, such as photographic kit on house insurance.
Good luck, but the odds are in favour of Square Trade...
Insurers make money out of customers. I've never i... (show quote)



Reply
Jul 23, 2016 09:07:30   #
insman1132 Loc: Southwest Florida
 
Have ST on my computers, cameras, and phones. Happy to advise I have never had to file a claim. Lots of positive reviews, however.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2016 10:10:35   #
Ed Chu Loc: Las Vegas NV
 
a few years ago I read where someone sold their warranty company to another for $ 1 billion; that should tell you everything you need to know about profitability

Reply
Jul 23, 2016 10:42:41   #
47greyfox Loc: on the edge of the Colorado front range
 
If you feel the need for additional warranty protection, ST is a good choice IMHO. They do a good business, premium rates seem reasonable, so with all that cash hanging around, they are responsive when it comes to paying out claims.

Reply
Jul 23, 2016 11:26:58   #
stevetl Loc: Muskegon, MI / Central Florida
 
My wife and I purchased 2 IPhone 5S from Sam's Club (Verizon). My wife started to have touch screen problems during the second year so we had to send to phone repair (Prepaid by Square Trade) to a Camera/Phone repair in Chicago. They replaced the glass and IQ -It took a week to get back and had a $65 copay. Plan cost $99 for multi year coverage.

Reply
Jul 23, 2016 14:53:24   #
DWU2 Loc: Phoenix Arizona area
 
Third-party warranty providers are betting you that you won't have a problem. The odds are in their favor. Imagine if you took out third-party warranties on everything you own. From time to time, you'd collect on something (assuming the warranty provider is legit), but you'd pay out more than you took in. You'd be better off to self-insure: set aside some replacement money. If the gizmo doesn't fail over its useful lifetime, you're ahead of the game.

Reply
 
 
Jul 23, 2016 20:31:38   #
BudsOwl Loc: Upstate NY and New England
 
DWU2 wrote:
Third-party warranty providers are betting you that you won't have a problem. The odds are in their favor. Imagine if you took out third-party warranties on everything you own. From time to time, you'd collect on something (assuming the warranty provider is legit), but you'd pay out more than you took in. You'd be better off to self-insure: set aside some replacement money. If the gizmo doesn't fail over its useful lifetime, you're ahead of the game.



Reply
Jul 24, 2016 08:24:07   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
DWU2 wrote:
Third-party warranty providers are betting you that you won't have a problem. The odds are in their favor. Imagine if you took out third-party warranties on everything you own. From time to time, you'd collect on something (assuming the warranty provider is legit), but you'd pay out more than you took in. You'd be better off to self-insure: set aside some replacement money. If the gizmo doesn't fail over its useful lifetime, you're ahead of the game.


That is the way ALL insurance works. The insurance companies have actuaries that determine the probability of an incident happening. Then the company applies a price to that probability and determines how much profit they need to cover the loss. Basically they take the possibility of a mishap and the cost of the mishap and then determine how many of those mishaps would occur in a group of 1000 customers then determine how much they need to charge. This is over simplified but that is essentially how it works. With camera equipment or radios, TV's and anything else the same is true. 1000 people may purchase insurance on a camera but only 3 of that 1000 will ever need the insurance. You, the insured are betting (protecting yourself) that a loss will occur and they are betting that it wont. You have to determine if the cost of the insurance is worth the probability that it will not happen. For me, I got insurance on the Nikon point and shoot. It cost me something like an additional $40 for 3 years coverage (All 3 years covered stuff that the Nikon Warranty would NOT cover, like drops, water damage, accidents etc. Plus covered everything that the Nikon warranty would stop covering after the 1st year) In the case of the Nikon point and shoot, it paid off. The wife dropped a mug of hot coffee on the camera and smashed it so Square Trade sent a check to replace the camera. I also purchased the insurance on my Nikon D7100, and it will expire in 3 months without ever having been used. I also got it on my Nikon D610 for the same reason. We carry car insurance, home owners insurance, life insurance, etc and have used the car insurance and home owners a little. We've probably paid more for the insurance than the losses but that is life. We don't have to scrape together the money if and when the problem occurs. Do the insurance companies make money? sure but when we need to collect, we might now have the money to replace what is lost but we can come up with the premium when it is due. Self insurance is fine but too easy to hit the money for other things. Square trade is a one time charge that could easily be written of as the tax since my purchases are from B&H or Adorama and I generally don't pay tax or shipping.

Reply
Jul 24, 2016 14:17:42   #
One Rude Dawg Loc: Athol, ID
 
Works great, use it all the time, no problems.

Reply
Jul 24, 2016 14:28:45   #
bdk Loc: Sanibel Fl.
 
I had a square Trade warranty on a 2000 watt inverter for my boat. It stopped working, I took it back to the store they made a phone call and 10 minutes later I walked out with a new inverter.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.