Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Main Photography Discussion
Buyer's Remorese?!
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 28, 2016 10:04:24   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
Your dog told me he wants you to keep the L lens ...

Reply
Jun 28, 2016 10:10:33   #
AntonioReyna Loc: Los Angeles, California
 
After having used the 24-105L lens, and then getting the 28-300 superzoom, I think you will be disappointed in the results. I don't know whether you use it on a crop or full frame sensor, but the 24-105L lens is hard to beat for quality of results and versatility.

Reply
Jun 28, 2016 11:34:37   #
DaveO Loc: Northeast CT
 
rpavich wrote:
It's simple.


Gear doesn't equal happiness.

If you look to gear to fulfill your inner happiness, you will run this treadmill forever. I don't know if you noticed this but the gear buying thing goes like this:

1.) You are unsatisfied with whatever you have.
2.) You begin to check out what other gear would be "better"
3.) You zero in on something that you want.
4.) You save and save.
5.) You buy the said piece of gear.
6.) You have that initial rush of happiness that new gear brings.
7.) You start to get those unfulfilled feelings again.
8.) The cycle starts over at step 1.
It's simple. br br br Gear doesn't equal happine... (show quote)



How true!

Reply
 
 
Jun 28, 2016 12:17:50   #
Gobuster Loc: South Florida
 
danielb59 wrote:
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-300 F3.5-6.3 for my Canon 6D; it should arrive tomorrow via the Big BrownTruck. The lens that I have used most of the time is the Canon L EF 24-105 F4. I ordered the Tamron to replace the Canon lens. To be sure, due to my limited financial status and retirement situation, I saved several months in order to be able to afford the new lens. I had hoped to sell the Canon lens in order to partially defray the cost of the Tammy. I have loved the Canon lens but my hope is that the new Tammy, due to its longer reach, will assist in reducing lens changes as situations dictate. I have several other L lenses and use them all for limited applications. The two lenses may be redundant. Therefore, at the risk of tying up my financial funds needlessly, I need someone to talk me into keeping the L lens or to give me some advice toward selling it. Sounds childish I know, but at age 67 I may be regressing into my second childhood. Thanks in advance for any responses. Dan
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-... (show quote)


I was hesitant to get a 28-300 as it was pooh-pooh'ed in a number of reviews, but went ahead and got one anyway (Nikon in my case) and have loved the lens! It's on my camera most of the time and delivers very good results. In fact, I've met 3 pros who use the lens extensively. One of the members of the camera club I belong, shoots a Tamron 28-300 on a 6D and gets great results, confirmed by the consistent high scores he gets in our monthly judging! The 24-105L is a fine lens but does lack the versatility of a 28-300. If you have a 30 return option on the new Tammy, I suggest you do some shooting and draw your own conclusions. I have a feeling that once you put that 28-300 on the camera, you might not want to take it off!

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 05:39:57   #
Patw28 Loc: PORT JERVIS, NY
 
The primary parameter of 'good buy' is the intensity of desire.

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 06:03:18   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
I think everyone has been in this dilemma. And not just camera gear. Good luck on your decision.

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 06:25:17   #
markngolf Loc: Bridgewater, NJ
 
Try out the new lens. Most dealers have a 30 day return policy for refund. Certainly Adorama & BHPhoto do. If you decide to return it, you may have to pay for return shipping charges. Amazon will give you free return if you are Prime.
Good luck in making your decision.
Mark

danielb59 wrote:
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-300 F3.5-6.3 for my Canon 6D; it should arrive tomorrow via the Big BrownTruck. The lens that I have used most of the time is the Canon L EF 24-105 F4. I ordered the Tamron to replace the Canon lens. To be sure, due to my limited financial status and retirement situation, I saved several months in order to be able to afford the new lens. I had hoped to sell the Canon lens in order to partially defray the cost of the Tammy. I have loved the Canon lens but my hope is that the new Tammy, due to its longer reach, will assist in reducing lens changes as situations dictate. I have several other L lenses and use them all for limited applications. The two lenses may be redundant. Therefore, at the risk of tying up my financial funds needlessly, I need someone to talk me into keeping the L lens or to give me some advice toward selling it. Sounds childish I know, but at age 67 I may be regressing into my second childhood. Thanks in advance for any responses. Dan
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2016 06:25:51   #
RPSteiner
 
rpavich wrote:
It's simple.

Gear doesn't equal happiness.

If you look to gear to fulfill your inner happiness, you will run this treadmill forever. I don't know if you noticed this but the gear buying thing goes like this:

1.) You are unsatisfied with whatever you have.
2.) You begin to check out what other gear would be "better"
3.) You zero in on something that you want.
4.) You save and save.
5.) You buy the said piece of gear.
6.) You have that initial rush of happiness that new gear brings.
7.) You start to get those unfulfilled feelings again.
8.) The cycle starts over at step 1.
It's simple. br br Gear doesn't equal happiness. ... (show quote)


Well said! Unfortunately, that cycle applies to lots of things in life.

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 06:26:27   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
rpavich wrote:
It's simple.

Gear doesn't equal happiness.

If you look to gear to fulfill your inner happiness, you will run this treadmill forever. I don't know if you noticed this but the gear buying thing goes like this:

1.) You are unsatisfied with whatever you have.
2.) You begin to check out what other gear would be "better"
3.) You zero in on something that you want.
4.) You save and save.
5.) You buy the said piece of gear.
6.) You have that initial rush of happiness that new gear brings.
7.) You start to get those unfulfilled feelings again.
8.) The cycle starts over at step 1.
It's simple. br br Gear doesn't equal happiness. ... (show quote)


It's number 6 that GAS is all about! I admit, I'm guilty too.
I used to shoot a lot of Canon for a couple of years (sports and action, mainly) and occasionally tried a friend's non-L lens on my 1DX. I always went back to the L in whatever focal-length because of either focusing speed, contrast, color rendition, sharpness or mainly it just looked better sitting on my Canon body. The only lens that really gave the Canon L a run for its money was the Sigma Art 50 f1.4. That sucker is sharp. I like the picture rendition of the Canon 50 1.2L better though, even the 50 f1.4 non-L!
I'd give the Tammy a long-hard tryout (2 weeks should do it), then give in to your buyer's remorse...

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 06:28:13   #
lukan Loc: Chicago, IL
 
AntonioReyna wrote:
After having used the 24-105L lens, and then getting the 28-300 superzoom, I think you will be disappointed in the results. I don't know whether you use it on a crop or full frame sensor, but the 24-105L lens is hard to beat for quality of results and versatility.


^^^ x2. Totally agree.

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 07:15:17   #
Robertl594 Loc: Bloomfield Hills, Michigan and Nantucket
 
Would you consider not buying a new lens but rather another body? If you are looking for not having to change lenses, carry two bodies with different lenses. That's what I do. I make sure that my cameras' clocks are exactly the same so I can import and sort by capture time so it does not matter what camera I use. For me, it's much better to have two cameras with a wide range with faster lenses than to have to change lenses. To get a wide range in one lens, you either have to spend a lot of money for speed or compromise on price to buy a slower lens to get the range you want.
Just a thought.
RL

Reply
 
 
Jun 29, 2016 07:42:39   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
danielb59 wrote:
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-300 F3.5-6.3 for my Canon 6D; it should arrive tomorrow via the Big BrownTruck. The lens that I have used most of the time is the Canon L EF 24-105 F4. I ordered the Tamron to replace the Canon lens. To be sure, due to my limited financial status and retirement situation, I saved several months in order to be able to afford the new lens. I had hoped to sell the Canon lens in order to partially defray the cost of the Tammy. I have loved the Canon lens but my hope is that the new Tammy, due to its longer reach, will assist in reducing lens changes as situations dictate. I have several other L lenses and use them all for limited applications. The two lenses may be redundant. Therefore, at the risk of tying up my financial funds needlessly, I need someone to talk me into keeping the L lens or to give me some advice toward selling it. Sounds childish I know, but at age 67 I may be regressing into my second childhood. Thanks in advance for any responses. Dan
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-... (show quote)


Most reputable companies allow 10 days to return. My suggestion is once you get the lens, you shoot the pants off of it for three days. Look at the results, if you still LIKE IT A LOT, keep it, if not, return it. If you bought from B&H or like company you should be fine. If not, GOOD LUCK.

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 07:52:13   #
BuckeyeBilly Loc: St. Petersburg, FL
 
danielb59 wrote:
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-300 F3.5-6.3 for my Canon 6D; it should arrive tomorrow via the Big BrownTruck. The lens that I have used most of the time is the Canon L EF 24-105 F4. I ordered the Tamron to replace the Canon lens. To be sure, due to my limited financial status and retirement situation, I saved several months in order to be able to afford the new lens. I had hoped to sell the Canon lens in order to partially defray the cost of the Tammy. I have loved the Canon lens but my hope is that the new Tammy, due to its longer reach, will assist in reducing lens changes as situations dictate. I have several other L lenses and use them all for limited applications. The two lenses may be redundant. Therefore, at the risk of tying up my financial funds needlessly, I need someone to talk me into keeping the L lens or to give me some advice toward selling it. Sounds childish I know, but at age 67 I may be regressing into my second childhood. Thanks in advance for any responses. Dan
I'm just not sure....I have ordered the Tamron 28-... (show quote)


As some have suggested, check the return policy of the business you bought the lens from. If you can return it within a certain time period for a full refund (shipping may or may not be refundable), then test it and make up your own mind...you'll know within a short time whether you like it or not. For future reference, rent the lens first as some have suggested. Here is a link to a lens rental company with the Tamron in question:

https://www.lensrentals.com/rent/canon/lenses/telephoto/tamron-28-300mm-f3.5-6.3-di-vc-for-canon

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 07:58:47   #
mike1 Loc: charlotte nc
 
I bought a tamron 28-300 a couple of years ago for my sony 850 and practically haven't taken it of the camera since..........I think you'll really like the lens for it's versatility.........you can buy them used for less than $300..........

Reply
Jun 29, 2016 08:14:27   #
studavis
 
That has been my cary around lens for about the last year. I will put it on my 7D II or 5D III and love it. Have fun and travel light.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.