Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
Evolution before your eyes.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Jun 15, 2016 14:21:31   #
mwalsh Loc: Houston
 
green wrote:
That is not correct... First of all, I don't think you believe you are separate and apart from the creator of the universe... that separation is illusion, the illusory nature of our world.

The fact that we live in time-space constrains us to see the unity of the universe as cause and effect, creator and creation, doer and done to.... these are just tints on reality due to the glasses we where when we put on a human body.


Where do "you" end and "I" start ?

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 14:59:39   #
green Loc: 22.1749611,-159.646704,20
 
mwalsh wrote:
Where do "you" end and "I" start ?
WOO-WOO ALERT!

It's funny, but "common sense" lags actual knowledge by 300-400 years... Most people today operate in a Newtonian Universe, where the rules were formulated hundreds of years ago.

Lorentz, Einstein and everyone since has been tweaking Newton's equations for the cases of extreme relative velocities and large curvatures of spacetime (gravity).

So, while slamming your Toyota into a tree will still kill you, there are subtle differences in your perception of reality if you can incorporate the advances of quantum physics into your "common sense".

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 16:06:36   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
mwalsh wrote:
Where do "you" end and "I" start ?


It has to do with the border between categories of mindsets. Green has the ability to be objective, fair, and reasonable and logical no matter who he is dealing wth. You not so much.

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2016 16:08:56   #
mwalsh Loc: Houston
 
Did some one fart?

LOL

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 16:11:36   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
WARNING: Infantile vomitus from spoiled brat above.......ignore

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 16:53:20   #
skylane5sp Loc: Puyallup, WA
 
Troll on, pony boy... keep patronizing and condescending. It's become your trademark.

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 18:05:18   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
Keenan wrote:
WARNING: Infantile vomitus from spoiled brat above.......ignore
Wow, what an original response..........the correct phrase is....."Irrelevant vomitus above.....please ignore"..........
Keenan wrote:
Green has the ability to be objective, fair, and reasonable and logical no matter who he is dealing with.
You, not at all..........

Reply
 
 
Jun 15, 2016 18:12:48   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Wow, what an original response..........the correct phrase is....."Irrelevant vomitus above.....please ignore"


Nope. Try to pay attention. That "correct" phrase is your phrase. Your preferences, and "correct", are not synonymous. In fact, if anything, you preferences are most often the opposite of correct. You are free to use your own phrase whenever you want. But please don't demand that I have to use it. You are not the thread policeman. I can make up my own phrases if I feel like it, and just because one of the words in my phrase - "vomitus" - happens to be a word you like, does not therefore mean that you have ownership of that word and can control how other people may or may not use it to your liking. Clear?


PS: Weren't you supposed to be ignoring me?

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 18:16:04   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
Hush..........you use so many words, yet you say so little..........

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 18:18:30   #
Keenan Loc: Central Coast California
 
slocumeddie wrote:
Hush..........you use so many words, yet you say so little..........


Again, you are not the thread policeman. The number of words I use happens to be my choice, and not yours.

So...my answer is 'no', I will not hush.

But thanks for asking



PS: Aren't you supposed to be ignoring me? You might want to review the definition of 'ignore' in the dictionary if you forgot.

Reply
Jun 15, 2016 22:02:07   #
LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley
 
slocumeddie wrote:
More nonsense.....


Ding ding ding…our first denier.

You cannot have information without first having an intelligent source.

Reply
 
 
Jun 16, 2016 23:10:23   #
slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again
 
LarJgrip wrote:
You cannot have information without first having an intelligent source.
And your evidence to support this statement....???

Reply
Jun 17, 2016 11:17:39   #
LarJgrip Loc: The Fraser Valley
 
slocumeddie wrote:
And your evidence to support this statement....???


In every example of information that I can see, the source is always a certain level of intelligence. I see no evidence to the contrary. If you are aware of any please feel free to make it known, otherwise this should be evidence enough for anyone. However, something tells me that you disagree.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.