Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
Why Walmart CAN afford to pay workers a $15 minimum wage
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Jun 4, 2016 13:30:16   #
bull drink water Loc: pontiac mi.
 
it's amazing how we get 3% when they are defending low wages, but something higher when they are asking investers to keep them on the oard of directors.
too many companys are conspiring to make new jobs part time. $25,000.00 today will put you in poverty in a lot of places. it's sick when working stiffs defend low wages.
how blind are you when you support a system that forces people with " good " jobs to live with permanent credit card bebt to make ends meet????

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 13:45:43   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Cykdelic wrote:
Nope......my numbers are exact.

It's your thought process that comes up short again. Yes, some employees get food stamps......I've already said the minimum wage was not designed to raise families on or to guarantee homes, smartphones, TVs, or cars, by the way.


Lol they each multi billionaires. An they can't afford there employs not to have to rely on food stamps. Get real for once your life. Lol

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 13:46:19   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
A 3% ROS has nothing to do with the class warfare you are pushing. It's the result of all expenses, including taxes. Two people working and making $25,000 per year should be able to make it. Of course, it won't include full cable, a smartphone, a new PC every two years, a/c, clubbing, et.al.

Try looking at the definition of poverty in, say 1972 versus today.

Do not go on a rant thinking people shouldn't have these things, by the way...........just saying a minimum wage job was NEVER intended to pay for all of it.

Reply
 
 
Jun 4, 2016 13:47:33   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
bull drink water wrote:
it's amazing how we get 3% when they are defending low wages, but something higher when they are asking investers to keep them on the oard of directors.
too many companys are conspiring to make new jobs part time. $25,000.00 today will put you in poverty in a lot of places. it's sick when working stiffs defend low wages.
how blind are you when you support a system that forces people with " good " jobs to live with permanent credit card bebt to make ends meet????


Amen to that.

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 13:50:01   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Cykdelic wrote:
A 3% ROS has nothing to do with the class warfare you are pushing. It's the result of all expenses, including taxes. Two people working and making $25,000 per year should be able to make it. Of course, it won't include full cable, a smartphone, a new PC every two years, a/c, clubbing, et.al.

Try looking at the definition of poverty in, say 1972 versus today.

Do not go on a rant thinking people shouldn't have these things, by the way...........just saying a minimum wage job was NEVER intended to pay for all of it.
A 3% ROS has nothing to do with the class warfare ... (show quote)


Haven't you been noticing people are preferring to remain single. One person should be able to sastain a survivable living.

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 13:50:10   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
dirtpusher wrote:
Lol they each multi billionaires. An they can't afford there employs not to have to rely on food stamps. Get real for once your life. Lol



How about if you get real, Red Dirt? If socialism is so nice, why don't you take the family down to, say, Venezuela?????

Another newsflash........Walmart jobs will begin to disappear (they already have started). Robotics will take away close to 90% of them before long (try and get a tour through one of their warehouses/fulfillment centers). Also, the use of "greeters" is strictly a social thing, and it is in the way out.

I fact, I now agree with you.........people shouldn't have to take such crap jobs so I encourage the march toward human replacement! Then the progressive wackyadoodles like you will finally be happy?

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 13:52:10   #
LambertJooe Loc: napa
 
If you increase wages with no corresponding increase in production, you will have an increase in cost of goods sold and retail prices. If you have increased prices you have inflation and you and I paying more. That, I think, is a basis for socialism.

Reply
 
 
Jun 4, 2016 15:55:57   #
JCam Loc: MD Eastern Shore
 
Cykdelic wrote:
Yes, that is a very good social justice (i.e. Socialist) view.

Expecting the arena of private business, and capitalism, to bail out the complete morons we have been electing at every level of government for +50 years would take us out of a democratic republic and into, at best, a socialist state. There not only is no obligation for businesses to make good on the shortfalls of both government and individual failure, it is in some cases against existing laws.

Now, I could possibly support a third form of wage.....minimum, living, and free market. The minimum would be designated for its original use, living for all jobs of 40 hours a week or greater and which fit a certain legal description, and all else
Yes, that is a very good social justice (i.e. Soci... (show quote)


Your third paragraph sounds like Socialism taken to the Extremes! I have a better idea: Get the government back to a reasonable size and budget, and out of any activity that isn't allowed by the Constitution, ie. the Designated Powers, all the rest left to the states. At least the state governments are closer to the voters and have more fear of their wrath!

I'd like to add that the qualification for voting be revised back to having an education, and being able to read, write and understand English, but the liberal howling would probably crash UUH.

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 17:41:55   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
dirtpusher wrote:
Haven't you been noticing people are preferring to remain single. One person should be able to sastain a survivable living.



But like all generations they may have to have roommates and/or understand the difference between needs and wants.

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 18:25:17   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Cykdelic wrote:
But like all generations they may have to have roommates and/or understand the difference between needs and wants.


i never did nor did i want want back 60's 70's. an if a job you wanted didn't pay eough. we didn't take it, till wages went up. then more likely they would contact you, with what you asked for. today with corporations wanting more illegals to flow in, it ba a forever to be able to see that happen again.

really don't believe actually see what is taking place these days at all.

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 19:33:57   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
dirtpusher wrote:
i never did nor did i want want back 60's 70's. an if a job you wanted didn't pay eough. we didn't take it, till wages went up. then more likely they would contact you, with what you asked for. today with corporations wanting more illegals to flow in, it ba a forever to be able to see that happen again.

really don't believe actually see what is taking place these days at all.




Ah, you describe a free market when you were young, but now you want the government to control it. That makes you an absolute hypocrite, Red Dirt. I see clearly.........progressives like yourself are ruining things with your corporation derangement syndrome!

We agree that the tide of illegal immigrants needs to be stopped, they cannot ever be allowed to vote, and their access to our social networks s/b zip.

Reply
 
 
Jun 4, 2016 19:34:54   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Yes, $15.00 per hour is better. Who wouldn't want a pay raise? But sooner or later, they will all want a pay raise to $20.00+ per hour, and then the same pay as diesel mechanics, nurses, plumbers, teachers, carpenters, and computer programmers. You want more money, learn a skilled trade. I worked minimum wage part time a long time ago, during and after High School like millions did, in a fast food facility. It was not suppose to be a lifetime job for me. It's not intended to raise an entire family on.

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 20:01:54   #
Cykdelic Loc: Now outside of Chiraq & Santa Fe, NM
 
mas24 wrote:
Yes, $15.00 per hour is better. Who wouldn't want a pay raise? But sooner or later, they will all want a pay raise to $20.00+ per hour, and then the same pay as diesel mechanics, nurses, plumbers, teachers, carpenters, and computer programmers. You want more money, learn a skilled trade. I worked minimum wage part time a long time ago, during and after High School like millions did, in a fast food facility. It was not suppose to be a lifetime job for me. It's not intended to raise an entire family on.
Yes, $15.00 per hour is better. Who wouldn't want ... (show quote)




Excellent post, mas!

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 20:04:07   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Cykdelic wrote:
Ah, you describe a free market when you were young, but now you want the government to control it. That makes you an absolute hypocrite, Red Dirt. I see clearly.........progressives like yourself are ruining things with your corporation derangement syndrome!

We agree that the tide of illegal immigrants needs to be stopped, they cannot ever be allowed to vote, and their access to our social networks s/b zip.


Boy you sure haven't a clue you vote republican so you the hypocrite. Plainly lol

Reply
Jun 4, 2016 20:05:50   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Cykdelic wrote:
Excellent post, mas!


You act like it a crime to make that much you are one liooney boi

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.