How did this happen? (Page 11): ...

Graham Thirkill Loc: Idylic North Yorkshire, England UK.

Graham Thirkill wrote:

Ebbotte was correct and it's "April Fools Day". I can see PS work on my 27"IMAC IF YOU ENLARGE THE PICTURE UP you can see the photoshopping whatever, it's a great big cloud engulfing the whole plane.

Quote "And this is not a trick question" Unquote"
"Not fair play to say that" Not cricket old chap.

I came late too or wouln't have botherd with this?????????

Cheers and Beers
Graham/098\

What do you think now????

LarryFB Loc: Depends where our RV is parked

Railfan_Bill wrote:

To all those who have suggested answers to this ph... (show quote)

After carefully reading through 5 pages of comments, I was trying to think how this could be anything other than HDR (three photos, slightly different times, different exposures). My only gradification is that I was right.

Thank you for posting this and asking the question. It well illustrates potential issues with HDR.

I'm glad you posted this and found the answer. Some of the comments were certainly going off into Never-Never Land.

Marionsho Loc: Kansas

LarryFB wrote:

After carefully reading through 5 pages of comments, I was trying to think how this could be anything other than HDR (three photos, slightly different times, different exposures). My only gradification is that I was right.

Thank you for posting this and asking the question. It well illustrates potential issues with HDR.

I'm glad you posted this and found the answer. Some of the comments were certainly going off into Never-Never Land.

Thanks for the post. It's always nice to review old posts. :thumbup:

JohnFrim Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.

I suspected in-camera HDR at the outset, and that has finally been resolved. What I find most useful from this post is the clear demonstration of what size of area the camera manipulates around the airplane and the effect it has on the "noise" in the sky.

rocketride Loc: Upstate NY

JohnFrim wrote:

I suspected in-camera HDR at the outset, and that has finally been resolved. What I find most useful from this post is the clear demonstration of what size of area the camera manipulates around the airplane and the effect it has on the "noise" in the sky.

Indeed.