Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
nikon 5100 vs 7000, which would you buy
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
May 14, 2012 05:25:34   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
mlkddk wrote:
I have the opportunity to acquire either. It will be Nikon, because I have a number of lenses for Nikon only. Positives, negatives?

Thanks


i had the option a few months ago and decided to go with the d5100 one reason was the articulated screen and then the price was about half. I also want more lens so buying the cheaper of the two helped with that. But i must say i have no regrets for buying the 5100 i love it and as of right now i see no reason to move up to something else.
I use manual mode and raw. i was not interested in all the other bells and whistles. some want the d7000 for the fps but i don' need a million frames a second to shoot landscapes and portrait. Unless you want the bells and whistle get the 7000 if you want to just have a great camera to take great photos get the d 5100

Reply
May 14, 2012 05:28:26   #
normanhall Loc: Leslie Missouri
 
normanhall wrote:
mlkddk wrote:
I have the opportunity to acquire either. It will be Nikon, because I have a number of lenses for Nikon only. Positives, negatives?

Thanks


i had the option a few months ago and decided to go with the d5100 one reason was the articulated screen and then the price was about half. I also want more lens so buying the cheaper of the two helped with that. But i must say i have no regrets for buying the 5100 i love it and as of right now i see no reason to move up to something else.
I use manual mode and raw. i was not interested in all the other bells and whistles. some want the d7000 for the fps but i don' need a million frames a second to shoot landscapes and portrait. Unless you want the bells and whistle get the 7000 if you want to just have a great camera to take great photos get the d 5100
quote=mlkddk I have the opportunity to acquire ei... (show quote)


It also is a 16 mega pixel camera with the same sensor as the 7000 so you are not compromising in my opinion a lot.

Reply
May 14, 2012 06:05:35   #
mborn Loc: Massachusetts
 
D7000 Haqve it love it very durable

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2012 07:07:08   #
ejrmaine Loc: South Carolina
 
I've owned the D7000 since it came out and have no regrets, it's a great camera.

Reply
May 14, 2012 07:15:35   #
Spodeworld
 
I have a d5000 and a d7000. I would go with the higher end model for the internal motor for greater lens options, the controls which mean you don't have to navigate through menus plus being able to use and meter with legacy lenses.

Reply
May 14, 2012 07:17:54   #
dnaylor48 Loc: Charles Town, WV
 
Cameras don't take "good pictures" any more than a wrench can fix ypur car, it's the USER.

Reply
May 14, 2012 07:40:41   #
Newdevonian
 
MtnMan wrote:
MT Shooter wrote:
Lenf wrote:
D-7000. I have had mine over a year, it is no comparison to a 5100. I use my 7000 almost very day and the picture quality is fantastic. *****


So how do you determine the picture quality of the D5100 does not compare to the D7000 when the use exactly the same sensor?


I have the same question.

My daughter-in-law bought a D3100 the same time I bought my D5100. Even though that sensor is not as many megapixels and doesn't have the same noise characteristics as the sensor in the D5100/7000 she takes great pictures with it as well.

We actually get far more people on UHH that have focusing problems with the D7000 than we do with the other two above. I don't know if it is the somewhat more detailed auto focus system (more dots) or just that more people buy the more expensive camera hoping it will take better pics for them; sort of more money than skill?
quote=MT Shooter quote=Lenf D-7000. I have had m... (show quote)


The only way to judge picture quality is large (20x16 or larger) paper prints. No viewing on a computer screen is going to show a difference.

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2012 07:47:32   #
Barny
 
Have upgraded from a D40X to the D5100. The articulated screen is brilliant. 11 focal points should be enough compared to the D7000's 39. Only need the focus motor in the D7000 body for old lenses. Biggest loss is only 4fps compared to 6fps for the D7000. Will spend the savings on a good speedlite, but which one?

Reply
May 14, 2012 07:47:51   #
rebeil Loc: florida
 
Short and Sweet D5100 love mine save money and buy GOOD lenes or go all the way to a D4

Reply
May 14, 2012 07:48:11   #
Al Beatty Loc: Boise, Idaho
 
Hi mlkddk,

My wife and I use a D200 & a D300 for much of our day-to-day photography but decided we wanted a Nikon that would shoot HD video and (more importantly) had a mic jack so we could use our radio-operated lavalier mic system. The clincher for us was the articulated LCD on the D5100 similar to our old CoolPix 8700. With it we can take low-to-the-ground shots/video and not have to bend over as far. For me that was important as I slide into the 70'ish age group. What we had to give up to get the articulated LCD would be important if we didn't already have a couple of great cameras for still shots. We had to give up a bunch of buttons that "set things" like focus mode, shutter release mode, ISO, etc. We hope Nikon puts an articulated LCD on the next model of the D7000 because that would have been (will be) our first choice if it had that feature. By the way, we used the D5100 on a mother's-day shoot yesterday and are very happy with the picture quality. Also, we did figure out some "work arounds" to help compensate for the loss of the outside buttons but really did miss them after using the older Nikons with those features for a number of years.

Good luck with your search, both cameras produce excellent quality images. We've tested them both. Let us know what you decide and why you made the decision to did. Take care & ...

Tight Lines - (Gretchen &) Al Beatty
www.btsflyfishing.com

Reply
May 14, 2012 07:58:04   #
martinfisherphoto Loc: Lake Placid Florida
 
D7000 as in has the internal focusing motor, now all my Nikon lens are AF

Reply
 
 
May 14, 2012 08:14:44   #
G4 Loc: Metro NYC/Jerseyside
 
There's a D7000 here. We find less menu related tasks as there are dedicated buttons rather then menu hunts for most settings we regularly change.
There is a weight penalty with the D7K due to the metal frame which generally means slightly more robust build quality. If your not changing with the technology this may mean something? Longevity?

If the sensors are identical then check the other internal features. I doubt you could make a bad choice with either.

Reply
May 14, 2012 08:35:41   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
I would double check and make sure your lenses will work on the 5100. If the do not have their own motors they wont. - Dave

Reply
May 14, 2012 08:39:37   #
sloscheider Loc: Minnesota
 
d7000 for me

Reply
May 14, 2012 08:53:15   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
mlkddk wrote:
I have the opportunity to acquire either. It will be Nikon, because I have a number of lenses for Nikon only. Positives, negatives?

Thanks

snapsort.com has a comparison of those cameras. http://snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-D5100-vs-Nikon_D7000

From personal experience, I prefer the D7000. It's more expensive, so it's better.

Seriously, it has a weather-sealed body, so I don't have to worry if it starts to drizzle while I'm out. Many of the controls are available directly, rather than having to go through the Menu system. I especially like having the motor in the camera, so it will auto focus with more lenses. Although I like the swivel screen, I find the easy access to controls more useful. I'll get the new model (D7200?) when it comes out, and probably sell the D5100.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.