Compositing Problem
Apr 15, 2016 10:39:36 #
Old Sarge wrote:
Thank you for looking and answering. You are right, the group was shot in Dallas. The two men at different locations in DC. Looks like one was shot from a higher angle than he was on. Accepting that 2 are missing is more realistic.
this was meant for rpavich
Apr 15, 2016 10:41:54 #
Toment wrote:
How about a collage of cameos?
Great idea! I could just make a collage of head shots. I will try to convince my daughter of that. Thank you for your input.
Apr 15, 2016 10:57:16 #
Listen to Bob Y.
I had a similar problem with a Christmas picture I needed. It was of the priest and all the kids in the church. I posted the 2 images I needed combined and the Hogs got to work on it.
It came out perfectly. You couldn't even tell it was from two photographs.
I had a similar problem with a Christmas picture I needed. It was of the priest and all the kids in the church. I posted the 2 images I needed combined and the Hogs got to work on it.
It came out perfectly. You couldn't even tell it was from two photographs.
Apr 15, 2016 14:15:32 #
Old Sarge wrote:
Thank you for looking and answering. You are right, the group was shot in Dallas. The two men at different locations in DC. Looks like one was shot from a higher angle than he was on. Accepting that 2 are missing is more realistic.
can you have the two shot with same perspective as group?
Apr 15, 2016 17:19:15 #
dirtpusher wrote:
can you have the two shot with same perspective as group?
No, they are at two different locations in the DC area, and the group is in Dallas.
Apr 15, 2016 17:23:43 #
Old Sarge wrote:
No, they are at two different locations in the DC area, and the group is in Dallas.
i was referring to distance to the camera. for similar height to the group :thumbup:
Apr 15, 2016 17:44:22 #
dirtpusher wrote:
i was referring to distance to the camera. for similar height to the group :thumbup:
I'll check and see if a "mulligan" is in play.
Apr 15, 2016 17:49:09 #
Old Sarge wrote:
I'll check and see if a "mulligan" is in play.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Apr 15, 2016 21:17:22 #
I want to thank everyone who chimed in, That's one of the good things about this forum. OK, I did it, it is not great, it is not even good, but it will pass. The discerning eyes of the members of this forum will easily pick out what is bad -- but with what I had to work with...it's OK.
Apr 15, 2016 21:41:18 #
Old Sarge wrote:
My daughter is preparing a group photo as part of ... (show quote)
Yikes, looks difficult or next to impossible. Perhaps it would have been better to have had mostly individual shots and a few pairs or triplets and make a collage or montage of a bunch of shots that would not have to match. :-( Good luck.
Apr 15, 2016 22:07:24 #
Old Sarge wrote:
I want to thank everyone who chimed in, That's one of the good things about this forum. OK, I did it, it is not great, it is not even good, but it will pass. The discerning eyes of the members of this forum will easily pick out what is bad -- but with what I had to work with...it's OK.
wow think you did an excelent job :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Apr 15, 2016 22:12:40 #
if you are doing layers , it should be quite simple. Photoshop. just put the layer on top or bottom...wherever u need it
Apr 16, 2016 00:05:16 #
greg vescuso
Loc: Ozark,Mo.
Old Sarge wrote:
Thank you for looking and answering. You are right, the group was shot in Dallas. The two men at different locations in DC. Looks like one was shot from a higher angle than he was on. Accepting that 2 are missing is more realistic.
:thumbup:
Apr 18, 2016 07:59:33 #
I found the article about compositing, but the link I mailed to myself didn't make the trip. Sorry. I'll try again.
Apr 20, 2016 13:58:49 #
You could add them into the back of the photo and change their perspective in photoshop. The folks in group will appreciate it.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.