Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
The $2.5 Billion U.S. Power Line That No State Can Stop
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 26, 2016 18:28:57   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-25/the-2-5-billion-u-s-transmission-line-that-no-state-can-stop

Reply
Mar 26, 2016 19:06:51   #
bdo Loc: Colorado
 
dirtpusher wrote:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-03-25/the-2-5-billion-u-s-transmission-line-that-no-state-can-stop


One has to ask why any state would want to stop this (or any other) transmission line from distributing clean (i.e., wind-generated) power?

My cynicism says state regulators are protecting existing hydrocarbon-based generating plants within their borders from any competition that might cause a rate drop. That's great for the private investor owned generating plants, but not so great for their customers.

And not so great for the environment, either.

Reply
Mar 26, 2016 19:08:16   #
tainkc Loc: Kansas City
 
But what the article did not mention at all was how end users will be taxed at 100% and that will pay for the subsidy to supply free electricity to those already on welfare. I just love socialism.

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2016 19:36:57   #
bdo Loc: Colorado
 
tainkc wrote:
But what the article did not mention at all was how end users will be taxed at 100% and that will pay for the subsidy to supply free electricity to those already on welfare. I just love socialism.


Your source of information for that assertion?

Reply
Mar 26, 2016 23:08:43   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
bdo wrote:
Your source of information for that assertion?


they doing it like that in nevada and oregon right now. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Reply
Mar 26, 2016 23:18:27   #
bdo Loc: Colorado
 
dirtpusher wrote:
they doing it like that in nevada and oregon right now. :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:


Once again, what is your reliable source for that information?

Never mind...

Reply
Mar 26, 2016 23:22:22   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
bdo wrote:
Once again, what is your reliable source for that information?

Never mind...


google. lol..... hold on

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2016 23:25:43   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
bdo wrote:
Once again, what is your reliable source for that information?

Never mind...


http://www.reviewjournal.com/business/solarcity-cuts-550-nevada-jobs-blames-new-net-metering-rate

http://www.slate.com/articles/business/the_juice/2016/01/solarcity_and_vivint_pulled_out_of_nevada_is_solar_power_losing_at_the_state.html

http://vegasinc.com/business/2016/feb/22/las-vegas-rooftop-solar-company-files-for-bankrupt/l

these all about it/,.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 07:26:11   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
dirtpusher wrote:
google. lol..... hold on


Exactly right, Many of the people in Nevada that spent money to install solar and other renewable sources are now paying much larger electric bills because the electric service is charging them a higher rate and then buying the power they generate back at a fraction of the worth. Several of the TV News magazines did articles about how they were having their solar generators disconnected because they were costing them money rather than saving them money.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 12:19:22   #
thomseninc
 
I may be 30+ years removed from betting my BSEE and MSEE, but 4000MW of power on a 600 kV line (DC) is going to take 6,666 amps of current. Who is confident that the crack regulators at the DOE have fully considered the impact of the MONSTROUS magnetic field that will surround these transmission lines.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 12:22:38   #
gmcase Loc: Galt's Gulch
 
thomseninc wrote:
I may be 30+ years removed from betting my BSEE and MSEE, but 4000MW of power on a 600 kV line (DC) is going to take 6,666 amps of current. Who is confident that the crack regulators at the DOE have fully considered the impact of the MONSTROUS magnetic field that will surround these transmission lines.


My guess? They haven't.

Reply
 
 
Mar 27, 2016 14:54:15   #
DaFox
 
The math is i=p/e, or i=600x10,000/4000,000,000. Which equals 150 micro amps. That is the only way that DC can be transmitted without very high losses (e.g. low current). It would be interesting to find out how they will convert it to AC on the receiving end.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 17:29:16   #
thomseninc
 
I'm pretty (i.e., very) sure I remember this: In a DC circuit, power (in watts) = volts x amps. So, (according to the article) 4,000 MW = 600 kV x current in amps, or current = 6,666 amps.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 17:58:20   #
DaFox
 
thomseninc wrote:
I'm pretty (i.e., very) sure I remember this: In a DC circuit, power (in watts) = volts x amps. So, (according to the article) 4,000 MW = 600 kV x current in amps, or current = 6,666 amps.


I believe that 4000MW is 4,000,000,000 watts (MW equal million watts) Now, do the math: i=600KV divided by the 4,000MWs.

Reply
Mar 27, 2016 20:52:49   #
f8bengal Loc: West Nawth Carolinah
 
Not a 700 mile DC power line!! How many times do they have to prove that Edison was wrong about DC current, and that AC transmission is the only way to go? Do we have to have to have the Chicago World's Fair all over again? Resistance losses in a DC line that distance won't leave enough juice to run a one-slice toaster by the time it gets to Tennessee. Not only that but Tennessee is still running on depression-era TVA dam projects and cut-rate power rates that the rest of us are still paying for.
Not only that but the enviro-wackos stopped another hydro dam in Tennessee because it might upset a 2" long minnow call the snail darter. So, now Oklahoma is going to kill millions of eagles and other endangered birds so that Tennessee won't have to irritate the snail darters, pay much higher power rates for the privilege and still have to have redundant coal/gas power on standby. Doing nothing.
Am I sounding cynical?

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.