Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out People Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
I don't like Lightroom at all! Here is why!
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
May 8, 2012 06:09:18   #
pshaffer Loc: Worthington, Ohio
 
A question - what do you use for your backup?? This, to me, is a critical question that I have only answered with dual storage. Not elegant, but effective. It sounds as though you have no backup.

(I have found that I can buy external drives cheap at wall mart. Western Digital 600gB for about $80)

In your initial post you said that while installing LR, APERTURE said it did not support removable storage. Was this a mis-type. Did you mean that LR reported that it didn't support removable storage?

Reply
May 8, 2012 06:49:42   #
steve_stoneblossom Loc: Rhode Island, USA
 
rpavich wrote:


You misunderstood what Lightroom was asking you. It was asking you where you wanted the Catalog file...which is just a small database file that keeps track of your edits.

Then it wanted to CATALOG your shots....either by moving them to a new location, or copying them to a new location, or just by noting where they are stored.

LR DOES SUPPORT offline storage...I use it all of the time.


I'm curious, when you import to LR, which method do you select, 'copy as DNG', 'copy', 'move' or 'add'?

For my workflow, I first copy raw images to an XHD, then import to LR using 'add' selection, then export edited versions to a new folder on XHD. Can you suggest a more sensible/efficient method? And if so, please elaborate.

Reply
May 8, 2012 07:05:59   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
steve_stoneblossom wrote:
rpavich wrote:


You misunderstood what Lightroom was asking you. It was asking you where you wanted the Catalog file...which is just a small database file that keeps track of your edits.

Then it wanted to CATALOG your shots....either by moving them to a new location, or copying them to a new location, or just by noting where they are stored.

LR DOES SUPPORT offline storage...I use it all of the time.


I'm curious, when you import to LR, which method do you select, 'copy as DNG', 'copy', 'move' or 'add'?

For my workflow, I first copy raw images to an XHD, then import to LR using 'add' selection, then export edited versions to a new folder on XHD. Can you suggest a more sensible/efficient method? And if so, please elaborate.
quote=rpavich br br You misunderstood what Ligh... (show quote)


I just do this:

I plug in my camera's CF card to the PC and LR fires up automatically.

I have it set on "copy" most of the time just in case there is a glitch in the transfer and something goes bad...then I can start over.

I always import to the same folder; sort of a "holding area" for culling shots; for evaluating them.

Once they are evaluated, then I move them to a subfolder for working on them.

After I have done whatever I want to do with them, I move them to a folder called "for archive".

Once or twice a month I hook up the offline drive and move the contents of the "for archive" folder to it.

I keep the real "keepers", and the ones that have sentimental value and the rest I don't care much about. I keep the RAW files and most of the time I upload the edited JPGS to flickr.

Reply
 
 
May 8, 2012 07:10:51   #
Cadugand Loc: Houston, Texas
 
When Lightroom "imports" your photos it isn't making a copy of them. It's just creating an internal catalog.

Reply
May 8, 2012 07:12:20   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
Cadugand wrote:
When Lightroom "imports" your photos it isn't making a copy of them. It's just creating an internal catalog.


Yes it is. When you have it set to "copy" it's making a physical copy.

When you have it set to "move" it's moving them to a new location.

The ONLY choice that doesn't change the location is "add"



Reply
May 8, 2012 07:14:46   #
steve_stoneblossom Loc: Rhode Island, USA
 
rpavich wrote:


I just do this:

I plug in my camera's CF card to the PC and LR fires up automatically.

I have it set on "copy" most of the time just in case there is a glitch in the transfer and something goes bad...then I can start over.

I always import to the same folder; sort of a "holding area" for culling shots; for evaluating them.

Once they are evaluated, then I move them to a subfolder for working on them.

After I have done whatever I want to do with them, I move them to a folder called "for archive".

Once or twice a month I hook up the offline drive and move the contents of the "for archive" folder to it.

I keep the real "keepers", and the ones that have sentimental value and the rest I don't care much about. I keep the RAW files and most of the time I upload the edited JPGS to flickr.
br br I just do this: br br I plug in my camera... (show quote)


OK thanks

Reply
May 8, 2012 08:31:58   #
Davethehiker Loc: South West Pennsylvania
 
pshaffer wrote:
A question - what do you use for your backup?? This, to me, is a critical question that I have only answered with dual storage. Not elegant, but effective. It sounds as though you have no backup.

(I have found that I can buy external drives cheap at wall mart. Western Digital 600gB for about $80)

In your initial post you said that while installing LR, APERTURE said it did not support removable storage. Was this a mis-type. Did you mean that LR reported that it didn't support removable storage?
A question - what do you use for your backup?? Thi... (show quote)


Pshaffer, your correct I failed to mention how I'm doing my backups and I do have concerns about this. For my internal HD I have been using Apple's "Time Machine" to hourly, incrementally backup in the background over a wireless LAN to a separate 1 TB HD. I keep my Aperture images saved on a second external 1TB HD. However, I discovered that Time Machine does not backup from external hard drives. I have been working around this with a brute force solution of periodically doing a "Copy" of my entire Aperture Library to a third NAS 1TB Buffalo HD. This is also done wirelessly over my LAN. I takes about 15 hours to preform this massive "Copy" of my 181GB+ Aperture Library over my Wireless LAN. I really do not trust or like this massive copy. I'm looking into getting more elegant software that can backup all my external hard drives. Time Machine while cute, is really not up to the job.

UHH member RNN recommended "Retrospect (www.retrospect.com if you're interested) works with Mac or PCs, can back up multiple systems on a network (Mac or PC, doesn't matter)"
edit_______ : After looking into "Retrospect" I discovered "chronosync" is much more favorably reviewed and an order of magnitude less expensive!

Yes, that is what LR said (if memory serves). I think this might me due to my funky Buffalo wireless HD. I never got that thing to work properly.

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
May 8, 2012 09:18:16   #
DavidM Loc: New Orleans, LA
 
Dave, rpaviich is correct as I use LR4 as well on my Windows PC. If your MAC sees the drive you want to use then LR should see it as well. Also LR will let you import any or all photos you select. Try only importing a few photos as a trial. I would has a local drive for the catalog as this would speed it up. Make sure you back up the catalog to a secondary drive. Try this link for lightroom help. I like it a lot.

DavidM

Reply
May 8, 2012 09:18:55   #
DavidM Loc: New Orleans, LA
 
Sorry I forgot the link.. http://www.photokaboom.com/_htm_menus/Lightroom_menu.htm

Reply
May 8, 2012 09:32:35   #
Davethehiker Loc: South West Pennsylvania
 
DavidM wrote:


Wow Dave, thanks for the great link! If you had sent this earlier I might not have ordered "Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 Classroom in a Book" this morning.

It will be good to have both. I just bookmarked this link.

:thumbup:

Reply
May 8, 2012 09:45:15   #
DavidM Loc: New Orleans, LA
 
Davethehiker wrote:
DavidM wrote:


Wow Dave, thanks for the great link! If you had sent this earlier I might not have ordered "Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4 Classroom in a Book" this morning.

It will be good to have both. I just bookmarked this link.

:thumbup:



Good luck with it. I'm still learning and would like to better understand the workflow process. I use autotone a lot then sync similar photos, then adjust each one if I feel it needs it, but I feel they may be a better way. I feel I spend too much time in LR, but I'm working with over several hundred photos.

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
May 8, 2012 09:54:49   #
mdorn Loc: Portland, OR
 
rpavich wrote:
Cadugand wrote:
When Lightroom "imports" your photos it isn't making a copy of them. It's just creating an internal catalog.


Yes it is. When you have it set to "copy" it's making a physical copy.

When you have it set to "move" it's moving them to a new location.

The ONLY choice that doesn't change the location is "add"


Yep... this is why I don't use Adobe products to manage my photos. I guess I shouldn't generalize like this, but Elements does this cataloging as well. I use Elements occasionally for editing, but the catalog feature really forces you to give up a lot of control. A simple file structure with all the original files is best. Use the application; don't let the application use you. Just my opinion. I'm sure it has many wonderful features that I am missing.

Reply
May 8, 2012 10:02:17   #
ken4peace
 
Davethehiker wrote:
I take a LOT of photographs and I shoot RAW. My photo data base is large. I'm currently using Aperture to manage my photos. As my Aperture Library grew in size and used more of MacBook Pro's HD space, my computer slowed down A LOT. I solved this problem by moving my Aperture Library off my computer and onto a remote TB HD dedicated to just this this Library of photos. I'm connected to this remote HD via a wireless LAN. True, there is a penalty to pay in terms of the time it takes to retrieve and save photos. This is more than compensated for by the overall speed of my computers response now that I have headroom on my computer HD.

Lightroom arrived today and I installed it. During the install it asked me where I wanted to store my photo data. I directed it to my external HD via the wireless LAN. Aperture reported back that "It does not support removable storage media". It then jumped to another window that wanted to import all my photos into Lightroom; are they crazy! I'm afraid that would slow my computer to a crawl.

For your information my Aperture Library is currently over 181 GB and growing.

I forced Lightroom off. I'm now looking into how to uninstall it.
I take a LOT of photographs and I shoot RAW. My ph... (show quote)


Perhaps you also need to look at editing and deleting some of your photo's so that you will have more room.

Reply
May 8, 2012 10:10:18   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
mdorn wrote:
rpavich wrote:
Cadugand wrote:
When Lightroom "imports" your photos it isn't making a copy of them. It's just creating an internal catalog.


Yes it is. When you have it set to "copy" it's making a physical copy.

When you have it set to "move" it's moving them to a new location.

The ONLY choice that doesn't change the location is "add"


Yep... this is why I don't use Adobe products to manage my photos. I guess I shouldn't generalize like this, but Elements does this cataloging as well. I use Elements occasionally for editing, but the catalog feature really forces you to give up a lot of control. A simple file structure with all the original files is best. Use the application; don't let the application use you. Just my opinion. I'm sure it has many wonderful features that I am missing.
quote=rpavich quote=Cadugand When Lightroom &quo... (show quote)


Give up control?

Isn't what it allows the epitome of control? You can copy or move or add...whatever you want in whatever file structure you want....I don't get how that's giving up control?

Reply
May 8, 2012 10:59:25   #
Goldwinger Loc: Boynton Beach Florida
 
Davethehiker wrote:
I decided to try to let Lightroom keep it's pointers where ever it wanted. Then I asked it to import the Aperture photos. I directed to the wireless LAN link where my Aperture photos reside, but gave me this message:
"Your selected catalog is invalid, please select again."
Too bad! Maybe Lightroom will include this in a future upgrade.

Until then I can use a hardwired external hard drive as both of you gentlemen suggested. I do my best work reclining on a soft couch, laptop leaning on my body. The cable to the HD is a gauntlet I would prefer to avoid. :lol:

I could buy another HD and just keep it near my corner of the couch dedicated for LR use. :idea:

The good news is I only payed $76 for LR with an academic discount.
I decided to try to let Lightroom keep it's pointe... (show quote)


Dave I understand you like wireless , but for speed it takes up alot as you said, what I do is velcro my TB to the lid of my laptop and use it Firewired , its never in my way and it fast fast fast

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.