What Caused the difference in these two sequential images?
Jan 22, 2016 07:11:32 #
wiselee
Loc: Henderson,NV.
What focus are you using, spot or matrix? If you are using spot it could easily change if you didn't find the same point of focus on the 2nd shot.
Jan 22, 2016 07:13:25 #
Morning Star wrote:
Shutter didn't have a change to open or close all the way between images.
Sorry, I can't explain it better than that...
Sorry, I can't explain it better than that...
I also think it has something to with the shutter, assuming it moves horizontally.
Jan 22, 2016 07:24:10 #
PhotoArtsLA wrote:
Look for crop circles nearby. It's clearly the edge of a UFO outlined by its landing lights caught in a rare moment when the craft abandoned its cloaking for a split second, which is common in freezing weather.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jan 22, 2016 07:24:41 #
jerryc41 wrote:
Ah, electronics! A guess here - Since the second picture has some of the dark house, the camera read a darker scene and gave it more exposure. As for the line down the center, separating light and dark, I don't have a clue.
Could the shutter have stuck in the cold?
Jan 22, 2016 08:19:26 #
Jan 22, 2016 08:28:05 #
Fotoserj wrote:
Could be a ray pay of sun light, go back and check the roof line
I believe the camera exposed the light accurately and there is nothing wrong. I do believe that is a shadow cast by the roof line.
Jan 22, 2016 09:01:00 #
Rongnongno wrote:
Figures. Canon is really another name for free-loader homeless folks (and these are know to refuse work when offered)...
:shock: :mrgreen: :XD: :hunf: :lol: :lol: :lol:
----
* Note for the trolls, this is not to take seriously even if there is some truth in my statement... Tried to hire a guy for a few jobs around the house for a decent pay ($10 per hour) never showed up... And that was not the first time.
:shock: :mrgreen: :XD: :hunf: :lol: :lol: :lol:
----
* Note for the trolls, this is not to take seriously even if there is some truth in my statement... Tried to hire a guy for a few jobs around the house for a decent pay ($10 per hour) never showed up... And that was not the first time.
Speaking from experience? :mrgreen:
Jan 22, 2016 09:39:23 #
Ranjan
Loc: Currently Cyber-Nation!
f8lee wrote:
It looks to me as though the sun managed to break through the cloud cover just enough to be unnoticed by the naked eye but recorded by the machine. The line might just be the resultant shadow from the roofline.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Jan 22, 2016 10:11:50 #
Peterff wrote:
What do I say? I guess I'm just more of a purist, and like the natural look, rather than heavily or obviously post-processed. I hate it when you can see the join or other attributes of modification! Plus, I don't always think that full frame or more megapixels increases the quality of experience.
I guess its just a personal thing!
I guess its just a personal thing!
Don't like post processed---then you will hate the recent Sports Illustrated cover shot of Serena Williams. I'll say no more.
Jan 22, 2016 10:19:23 #
Jan 22, 2016 11:21:51 #
Jan 22, 2016 11:30:35 #
Welding Teacher wrote:
Carried the camera around with me yesterday afternoon while walking around the neighborhood. My wife slipped in the snow and I had to take a picture when I realized she was laughing.
The difference in exposure in the 2nd image is not the result of flash as there was none and mine is actually taped down since it no longer stays latched.
The difference in exposure in the 2nd image is not the result of flash as there was none and mine is actually taped down since it no longer stays latched.
You were holding the camera longwise vertical, right? The shutter got momentarily stuck in travel causing increased exposure to half the frame.
Jan 22, 2016 11:37:05 #
Jim Bob wrote:
Agreed.
An exposure difference would not split vertically down the center of the image. It would effect it globally.
A shutter lag is the most likely culprit. Call the manuf. service dept.
I believe the Copal shutter does travel vertically in the D5100. Or horizontally in the portrait orientation. I'm puzzled by the little jag in the center.
It looks overcast, doubt if it could be a shadow line.
Jan 22, 2016 11:43:13 #
f8lee wrote:
It looks to me as though the sun managed to break through the cloud cover just enough to be unnoticed by the naked eye but recorded by the machine. The line might just be the resultant shadow from the roofline.
But the angle of the separation line is perpendicular to the out of scene roof line.
Jan 22, 2016 11:47:00 #
bdk wrote:
If it was VERY cold and the camera was VERY cold and you fired two off one right after the other , then I would say it was a shutter problem.
How about a cloud going by? ( yea I know thats REALLY stretching it)
How about a cloud going by? ( yea I know thats REALLY stretching it)
I thought shutters moved vertically now?
Need more info.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.