Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Sports Photography
Blurring Background On Sports Photos
Page 1 of 2 next>
Nov 11, 2015 20:36:12   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
Hi all you sports photographers out there. Here is my problem and don't know how to fix it. Please help. I shoot with a Nikon D-7100 w/18=140 3.5, 55-300 5.6, 50 1.8. How do I shoot with large aperture (to blur background) with the equipment and camera I have?


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Nov 11, 2015 22:51:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Jules - See the link below for a review of your 18-140 lens. I've used this lens a few times on a D7100. From the first photo of the three players, notice the following information from the EXIF data: 140mm / 1/1250s / f/9 / ISO-400 using Shutter Priority. Rockwell's review includes the suggestion of using f/5.6 and the maximum 140mm for the best background blur this lens can achieve. You'll need to shoot using Aperture priority or manually to maintain the maximum f/5.6 aperture using this lens. But, f/5.6 isn't that wide to achieve that dreamy out of focus background. Rockwell's review rates this lens sharp wide open so you should feel confident changing to Aperture Priority. But, on a bright sunny day such as your first example, you'll need to lower your ISO and may need to use an ND filter to not overexpose.

http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18-140mm.htm

You'll also have to experiment on the resulting depth of field at f/5.6. The three players are not on the same plane where the first player might be in perfect focus but not the others at f/5.6. You can download a DoF calculator for your phone that can help you decide an f-value based on distance to the action as well preferences for the results.

All these suggestions work for your current lenses. Your 50mm has the widest aperture. I'd try that lens at f/2 to f/2.8 to balance sharpness and depth of field with a background blur. But, 50mm is pretty limited for sports / action unless you can be right next to the action. Professional lenses with a constant f/2.8 or f/4 aperture would be the next option, such as a 70-200 zoom or a 200 or 300mm prime. I'd start with the suggestions for a wide aperture first before looking for still more equipment.

Reply
Nov 12, 2015 10:28:38   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Jules - See the link below for a review of your 18-140 lens. I've used this lens a few times on a D7100. From the first photo of the three players, notice the following information from the EXIF data: 140mm / 1/1250s / f/9 / ISO-400 using Shutter Priority. Rockwell's review includes the suggestion of using f/5.6 and the maximum 140mm for the best background blur this lens can achieve. You'll need to shoot using Aperture priority or manually to maintain the maximum f/5.6 aperture using this lens. But, f/5.6 isn't that wide to achieve that dreamy out of focus background. Rockwell's review rates this lens sharp wide open so you should feel confident changing to Aperture Priority. But, on a bright sunny day such as your first example, you'll need to lower your ISO and may need to use an ND filter to not overexpose.
Thank you so much for all the information. I will try this.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18-140mm.htm

You'll also have to experiment on the resulting depth of field at f/5.6. The three players are not on the same plane where the first player might be in perfect focus but not the others at f/5.6. You can download a DoF calculator for your phone that can help you decide an f-value based on distance to the action as well preferences for the results.

All these suggestions work for your current lenses. Your 50mm has the widest aperture. I'd try that lens at f/2 to f/2.8 to balance sharpness and depth of field with a background blur. But, 50mm is pretty limited for sports / action unless you can be right next to the action. Professional lenses with a constant f/2.8 or f/4 aperture would be the next option, such as a 70-200 zoom or a 200 or 300mm prime. I'd start with the suggestions for a wide aperture first before looking for still more equipment.
Jules - See the link below for a review of your 18... (show quote)

Reply
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Nov 15, 2015 10:28:53   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Jules - See the link below for a review of your 18-140 lens. I've used this lens a few times on a D7100. From the first photo of the three players, notice the following information from the EXIF data: 140mm / 1/1250s / f/9 / ISO-400 using Shutter Priority. Rockwell's review includes the suggestion of using f/5.6 and the maximum 140mm for the best background blur this lens can achieve. You'll need to shoot using Aperture priority or manually to maintain the maximum f/5.6 aperture using this lens. But, f/5.6 isn't that wide to achieve that dreamy out of focus background. Rockwell's review rates this lens sharp wide open so you should feel confident changing to Aperture Priority. But, on a bright sunny day such as your first example, you'll need to lower your ISO and may need to use an ND filter to not overexpose.

I took your wonderful advice. Here are a few from your tips I took yesterday. Thanks again.
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18-140mm.htm

You'll also have to experiment on the resulting depth of field at f/5.6. The three players are not on the same plane where the first player might be in perfect focus but not the others at f/5.6. You can download a DoF calculator for your phone that can help you decide an f-value based on distance to the action as well preferences for the results.

All these suggestions work for your current lenses. Your 50mm has the widest aperture. I'd try that lens at f/2 to f/2.8 to balance sharpness and depth of field with a background blur. But, 50mm is pretty limited for sports / action unless you can be right next to the action. Professional lenses with a constant f/2.8 or f/4 aperture would be the next option, such as a 70-200 zoom or a 200 or 300mm prime. I'd start with the suggestions for a wide aperture first before looking for still more equipment.
Jules - See the link below for a review of your 18... (show quote)


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 13:14:10   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Jules - rather than attempting the quote reply, please reply directly. The text of your message is not appearing in either of your recent posts.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 16:14:54   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Jules - rather than attempting the quote reply, please reply directly. The text of your message is not appearing in either of your recent posts.


I took your suggestions about the 5.6 settings with the 18-140 for blurring the background. Thank you.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 22:45:10   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Glad to help!

Reply
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Nov 24, 2015 13:59:32   #
photoninja1 Loc: Tampa Florida
 
For general sports photos shoot your longest lens at the widest aperture and stay as close as possible to your subject. Practice on some setups to get an idea of the situation you need to make it work.

Reply
Dec 8, 2015 18:36:07   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
Hi CHG Canon: I wanted to show you my latest attempt. Let me know your thoughts. Thank you,
Jules


(Download)


(Download)

2056
2056...
(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
Dec 11, 2015 18:46:44   #
CaptainC Loc: Colorado, south of Denver
 
We often hear, "it is not the gear, it is the photographer" With sports photography that is not quite true - it IS the gear. There is simply no way around how a constant f/2.8 lens delivers that out of focus (or at least softer) background. Everything else is just a workaround. This is not to say you cannot get some great images. You have some really nice stuff here. But the two stops difference between the 5.6 and 2.8 is noticeable.

Your 50 f/1.8 can give you a great blurred background, but since you would have to be with 10-15 feet of the player, it is not very practical. :-)

Reply
Dec 11, 2015 18:55:24   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
Your so right about the 5.6 vs. 2.8. The cost of a 70-200 2.8 is a bit much for me right now. My wife would kill me I think. The next game is will shoot with the 50 1.8. I really like the blown out background. The coaches usually let me get pretty close to the action.
Thanks for your suggestions and comments. It is appreciated. These next 3 are a bit softer.
Jules


(Download)


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
 
 
Dec 18, 2015 15:17:25   #
juicesqueezer Loc: Okeechobee, Florida
 
Your technique is improving by every photo. Close, wide open, blur background!
Save up for that 70-200! You will fall in love with it! Next, save for the 300 or 400 f2.8. lol, it doesn't get any cheaper!

Reply
Dec 18, 2015 19:29:57   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
Thanks for your nice comments. The 70-200 2.8 is next. I probably will buy used.

Reply
Dec 18, 2015 19:42:52   #
tomglass Loc: Yorktown, VA
 
If your budget is constrained, I recommend you look at a 80-200mm f2.8 (get the one with the separate focus/zoom rings). It is an older model, but is an awesome lens! Shop around for the best buy, but Adorama has a used one now for $689... No VR, but not an issue with sports. You'll love this lens!

Reply
Dec 19, 2015 12:03:45   #
Jules Karney Loc: Las Vegas, Nevada
 
Thank you for the information.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Sports Photography
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.