Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Street Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
The future?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Nov 14, 2015 16:31:15   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
houdel wrote:
Totally subjective opinion. DSLR, Mirrorless, MILC, smartphone - all have a niche where they play best. Besides, your Mamiya 645 is a medium format DSLR, why do you still have it if it is outdated? Don't have the courage of your convictions?


Nostalgia.

My mom was a wedding photographer and used one. Also it allows me to dabble with velvia 50 something which no digital camera can do. Two different beasts...medium format slide film and a dslr.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 20:01:31   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
haroldross wrote:
I was just refering to the fact that the T5i was heavier and that it was odd that it would feel lighter than the T1i.


Ergonomics could account for it.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 20:57:20   #
n3eg Loc: West coast USA
 
lrryingle wrote:
I was in Target the other day and picked up a Canon T5i and I was immediately surprised at how light and cheap feeling it was compared to the first of the series, the T1i. I know the Rebels are entry level, but must they be made so unappealing? Do you have any thoughts about the current state of DSLRs and what the future may be for them?

This is the future. Sorry...

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Nov 14, 2015 21:43:42   #
puku8849
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
Nostalgia.

My mom was a wedding photographer and used one. Also it allows me to dabble with velvia 50 something which no digital camera can do. Two different beasts...medium format slide film and a dslr.


The Fuji X series does have a setting for Velvia manipulation.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 22:07:21   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
puku8849 wrote:
The Fuji X series does have a setting for Velvia manipulation.


Setting vs the real thing...I'll take the real thing.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 23:44:18   #
puku8849
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
Setting vs the real thing...I'll take the real thing.


And go the way of Dodo or Kodachrome.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 23:57:00   #
Basil Loc: New Mexico
 
My SX50 is extremely light compared to my 7D Mark II, and I like it! It is very easy to carry around when I don't want to be burdened with a heavy DSLR.

Reply
Check out Wedding Photography section of our forum.
Nov 15, 2015 01:18:00   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
Basil wrote:
My SX50 is extremely light compared to my 7D Mark II, and I like it! It is very easy to carry around when I don't want to be burdened with a heavy DSLR.


Same with me, my wife's Pana/Lumix FZ28 when she's not using it and I want to travel light. Super good little camera with a Leica lens. I leave my lenses and Nikon DSLR at home.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 06:56:20   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
puku8849 wrote:
And go the way of Dodo or Kodachrome.


Have you shot velvia 50 on medium format before?

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 10:36:14   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
Have you shot velvia 50 on medium format before?


Love that film.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 10:42:50   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
wlgoode wrote:
Love that film.


Something magical that digital can't "replicate or copy in a setting". I don't use it as much as I should.

Reply
 
 
Nov 15, 2015 10:46:37   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
Something magical that digital can't "replicate or copy in a setting". I don't use it as much as I should.


Velvia too.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 14:21:56   #
John_F Loc: Minneapolis, MN
 
MT Shooter wrote:
The increase in size and weight is due to the addition of the flip screen on the back, other than that they are just alike.


It seems the 60 gram difference is a lot more than a flip screen.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 16:33:30   #
Bobspez Loc: Southern NJ, USA
 
If the image quality is the same I'd say ligher is always better. That's what makes bridge cameras so attractive to many even if they do give up resolution and image quality. With a bridge camera you can handhold a shot of a bird with one hand at 720mm focal length and get a good image. Try that with a dslr and a 600mm lens. Sure the dslr with the 600mm lens and tripod will get the better image, but for most people that's too much equipment to lug around and use, and it won't be available when the random shot shows up for a second or two.

Reply
Nov 15, 2015 21:21:25   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
Bobspez wrote:
If the image quality is the same I'd say ligher is always better. That's what makes bridge cameras so attractive to many even if they do give up resolution and image quality. With a bridge camera you can handhold a shot of a bird with one hand at 720mm focal length and get a good image. Try that with a dslr and a 600mm lens. Sure the dslr with the 600mm lens and tripod will get the better image, but for most people that's too much equipment to lug around and use, and it won't be available when the random shot shows up for a second or two.
If the image quality is the same I'd say ligher is... (show quote)


Actually all things being the same, bigger is more stable because inertia makes it so.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.