Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
The future?
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Nov 13, 2015 11:49:38   #
lrryingle Loc: North Texas
 
I was in Target the other day and picked up a Canon T5i and I was immediately surprised at how light and cheap feeling it was compared to the first of the series, the T1i. I know the Rebels are entry level, but must they be made so unappealing? Do you have any thoughts about the current state of DSLRs and what the future may be for them?

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 12:14:40   #
rjaywallace Loc: Wisconsin
 
The plastics used in camera bodies today are a whole lot sturdier than the plastic materials of our youth. Polymer technology has moved on just as cameras have changed. The principal reason for using it in modern gear is to reduce weight while still being able to support longer, heavier lenses.

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 12:39:16   #
haroldross Loc: Walthill, Nebraska
 
That's odd. The T5i weighs in at 580g and the T1i weighs in at 520g. The T5i is also just a slight bit larger.

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Nov 13, 2015 12:43:52   #
lrryingle Loc: North Texas
 
I guess it was just my imagination or perception. Thanks

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 12:50:47   #
haroldross Loc: Walthill, Nebraska
 
lrryingle wrote:
I guess it was just my imagination or perception. Thanks


Was a lens attached? Did it have a battery in it?

After getting used to my 7D MK II, a lot of cameras feel light. Whenever I pick up my grandson's T2i with the 18-55mm kit lens, I am amazed at how light the camera is.

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 12:52:14   #
Cdouthitt Loc: Traverse City, MI
 
The "DSLR design" is outdated...has been for a few years now.

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 13:14:27   #
MT Shooter Loc: Montana
 
haroldross wrote:
That's odd. The T5i weighs in at 580g and the T1i weighs in at 520g. The T5i is also just a slight bit larger.


The increase in size and weight is due to the addition of the flip screen on the back, other than that they are just alike.

Reply
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Nov 13, 2015 13:42:06   #
lrryingle Loc: North Texas
 
It had the kit lens. No battery. I think it did not have textured plastic where my hand gripped the body.

Reply
Nov 13, 2015 13:43:04   #
haroldross Loc: Walthill, Nebraska
 
MT Shooter wrote:
The increase in size and weight is due to the addition of the flip screen on the back, other than that they are just alike.


I was just refering to the fact that the T5i was heavier and that it was odd that it would feel lighter than the T1i.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 06:16:30   #
puku8849
 
The next surprise will be the weight of the lenses. Technology has gone so far ahead that molded plastic elements can soon be made to perfection instead of heavy ground glass elements. All the billions of lenses used in cell phones are plastic, and millions of people are happy with the results they get.

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 06:55:24   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
lrryingle wrote:
I was in Target the other day and picked up a Canon T5i and I was immediately surprised at how light and cheap feeling it was compared to the first of the series, the T1i. I know the Rebels are entry level, but must they be made so unappealing? Do you have any thoughts about the current state of DSLRs and what the future may be for them?

Heavy doesn't necessarily mean better. Remember the old days when people wanted a heavy car that would "hold the road"? Some composites are tougher and more durable than metal. Many people here have complained that their cameras are too heavy and are looking for a lighter model. As I always say, I read lots of reviews and comparisons before buying anything.

Reply
Check out Professional and Advanced Portraiture section of our forum.
Nov 14, 2015 08:24:45   #
LFingar Loc: Claverack, NY
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Heavy doesn't necessarily mean better. Remember the old days when people wanted a heavy car that would "hold the road"? Some composites are tougher and more durable than metal. Many people here have complained that their cameras are too heavy and are looking for a lighter model. As I always say, I read lots of reviews and comparisons before buying anything.


Are you trying to say that the "lead sleds" we had back in the 50's & 60's didn't "hold the road"? Well, that could certainly explain some of the agricultural excursions my friends and I occasionally had! :-D
They just don't make cars like they used to! Be very thankful!

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 10:35:43   #
GENorkus Loc: Washington Twp, Michigan
 
lrryingle wrote:
I guess it was just my imagination or perception. Thanks


Must have built up a bit of muscles! LoL

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 11:48:42   #
houdel Loc: Chase, Michigan USA
 
Cdouthitt wrote:
The "DSLR design" is outdated...has been for a few years now.

Totally subjective opinion. DSLR, Mirrorless, MILC, smartphone - all have a niche where they play best. Besides, your Mamiya 645 is a medium format DSLR, why do you still have it if it is outdated? Don't have the courage of your convictions?

Reply
Nov 14, 2015 12:45:52   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
One of the most commented-on features of mirrorless cameras is their lightness. DSLR manufacturers will have noticed that and it will have influenced their manufacturing choices.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.