russelray wrote:
I'm not sure what you're trying to add to my comment. Nonetheless, many years ago I was using anything and everything to accomplish my tasks--Photoshop, Lightroom, Elements, Illustrator, InDesign, Draw, Photo-Paint, PaintShop Pro, GIMP, ACDsee, PicMonkey, and many others. After having several upgrades hit me at the same time, I decided to do something about it, and I chose Photoshop to accomplish all my work in since I knew that, with the learning effort on my part, it could do everything that all the other programs do. So I set out to learn. I was right. Everything that I was doing in all those other programs I now do in Photoshop. That means I don't have to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars a year in upgrades. Just $9.99 to Photoshop for Photoshop and Lightroom, but I don't use Lightroom at all.
I'm not sure what you're trying to add to my comme... (
show quote)
We agree...what I have come to understand is that those who just know Lightroom think that Lightroom is enough. Those who know PS and LR always use PS for final, intricate and special work. Those who use PS already have all the editing functions and features of LR in ACR. While this post lists a replacement for LR which I think is great, it is not a replacement of PS.