Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Slides to computer or other digital storage
Page <prev 2 of 2
Sep 21, 2015 09:48:15   #
RLSeipleSr Loc: North of Boston
 
[quote=jerryc41]... had ScanCafe convert a few hundred of mine, and they are excellent, but pricey - about $0.30 per slide ...
I used ScanCafe to convert 500 Vietnam era (and earlier) slides to *.jpgs cost was $160.00 ($0.32 per slide) ... I should have saved the money and did them myself ... jpegs were dirty, not in focus, and some were not copied the right way round ... live and learn ... !

I am now reading all I can and will end up doing my own coping for the couple of thousand, or so, slides that I have left (10 1/2 years in Germany).

Bob S

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 10:38:37   #
Silvermeteor Loc: South Carolina, USA
 
I've also heard of people using a light table. Placing the slide on the light table and then taking a picture with a digital camera on a tripod. I have not tried this since all of my slides have been lost over the years. I would think that a macro lens would be a big help too. Just random thoughts . . . .

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 12:28:03   #
lwerthe1mer Loc: Birmingham, Alabama
 
jerryc41 wrote:
I posted a link about this product from an online article a few days ago. It sounds like a good idea, but read reviews, if possible.

http://www.amazon.com/Jumbl-Scanner-Speed-Load-Adapters-Negative/dp/B00LU0XO3O/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1442837747&sr=8-1&keywords=slide+converter

I had ScanCafe convert a few hundred of mine, and they are excellent, but pricey - about $0.30 per slide.



To avoid the time-consuming process of scanning the slides myself, I used Scan Café also. Pricey but an excellent result.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2015 12:28:32   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Beemerboy wrote:
I am contemplating converting my vast slide collection to some digital format. I have looked at a unit called "slides to USB" for $99. It sounds like a painless process. I'm sure some, if not many, of us who grew up with good 'ol Kodachrome 64 have done something like this. If this has been previously discussed, I apologize. Would someone kindly share their experience?


If you have a dSLR, you can probably use a 'T' adapter to attach a bellows unit with an old enlarger lens to it. If you backlight your slides with a 5500K, 93 CRI CFL light source (Alzo sells good ones) bounced off a white card, you can copy them 1:1 with such a contraption. You just need a copy stand or similar contraption to keep everything lined up.

Do a CUSTOM white balance of the light. Use MANUAL exposure — Once established, it is the same for every slide. Shoot raw, if you want latitude to play around in post production.

Using a slide copier setup on your camera will give you better images than all but the very best high end scanners. It also works one heck of a lot faster!

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 12:36:39   #
Kuzano
 
Digitizing slides or transparencies will never provide a better solution than good, well thought out storage than what you have been doing for years.

I have done scans of many of mine, but will never throw the originals away. Few, if any, flatbed scanners can re-create the image quality in the original film. Even dedicated (expensive) scanners cannot live up to most peoples standards,

Furthermore, going digital will increase the risk of loss over proper methods of film and print storage.

If, after you spend HOURS and money on scanners, and find that you would actually throw out the film and print copies you now own, I suspect your standards are not very high. If memories are all you are after, as opposed to quality of image, then perhaps scanning will meet your goals.

I am over 50 years of photography, and 25 years in computer consulting and doubt that the current level of scanning would create duplicates that would have you laughing with glee as you throw boxes of slides into the incinerator.

I've used flatbeds, dedicated and drum scanner options and gave up scanning in favor of creating new images quite some time ago. In the meantime my boxes of slides, negatives and prints, continue to do me good service. Haven't LOST any.

Waste of time and money DIY and expensive done third party.

I discourage scanning. Too many opportunities to lose images through file handling, management, and media changes which require transition to new devices.

But... admittedly, you may experience something other than I have. I'll be out shooting, while you are scanning. :-o

I will say that the best alternative to scanning is a device that projects your image onto a screen shot from the other side by your digital camera, if you take care and set up properly. Your camera may just be your best scan alternative of an existing slide, negative or print preservation.

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 13:33:59   #
jenny Loc: in hiding:)
 
There is a considerable amt.of material on this subj. right here on UH. Just click into the search feature at the top of this page. I read them all but still never "got a round tuit" :)

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 13:36:07   #
Nikonist Loc: Ellensburg WA
 
Phylinpagosa wrote:
How does one use their digital camera to copy the slides?
Phyl in Colorado


This is what I did: http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-296208-1.html#4997551

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2015 13:57:06   #
Grandpa Pete Loc: Western Finger Lakes (NY)
 
Beemerboy wrote:
I am contemplating converting my vast slide collection to some digital format. I have looked at a unit called "slides to USB" for $99. It sounds like a painless process. I'm sure some, if not many, of us who grew up with good 'ol Kodachrome 64 have done something like this. If this has been previously discussed, I apologize. Would someone kindly share their experience?
I have scanned fifty year old slides with my Epson V500 photo scanner and printed them on 8 x 10 photo paper with great results on the Epson R 1800 printer.

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 14:07:03   #
louparker Loc: Scottsdale, AZ
 
burkphoto wrote:
If you have a dSLR, you can probably use a 'T' adapter to attach a bellows unit with an old enlarger lens to it. If you backlight your slides with a 5500K, 93 CRI CFL light source (Alzo sells good ones) bounced off a white card, you can copy them 1:1 with such a contraption. You just need a copy stand or similar contraption to keep everything lined up.

Do a CUSTOM white balance of the light. Use MANUAL exposure — Once established, it is the same for every slide. Shoot raw, if you want latitude to play around in post production.

Using a slide copier setup on your camera will give you better images than all but the very best high end scanners. It also works one heck of a lot faster!
If you have a dSLR, you can probably use a 'T' ada... (show quote)


I have achieived very good results (30x40 enlargements) from a similar, but slightly different setup.

I have a Pentax bellows unit I bought way back when I had Pentax 35mm SLRs to dupe slides and make internegs for printing (I shot transparency film exclusively because of the lack of any good negative color film at the time). Using a screw mount adapter, I put a Takumar 35mm lens on my Pentax DSLR (used a 35mm lens to account for the 1.5 crop, making the 35mm equivalent to a 47.5mm lens), mount the bellows unit on a tripod and then attach the camera to the bellows -- took a little experimenting to find the right amount of bellows extension for correct focus, locked that in on the rails, and then attached a slide holder that came with the bellows.

Then I place a daylight CFL bulb (available at Wal-Mart) in a extendable shade (has a white interior) and aim it at the slide holder. After blowing off any dust with canned air (and if necessary, very carefully removing any spots with film cleaner), I then insert the slide (all 40-50 yr. old Kodachrome IIs or 64s) into the slide holder, check focus through the viewfinder with the lens wide open and do fine focusing adjustments with the lens, then stop it down to f-11, 16 or 22 and shoot anywhere from .5 to 1.5 seconds (I always shoot RAW and usually make 3 shots at various f-stops and time).

Initial set up is somewhat time-consuming, but after everything is properly set up, "scanning" a slide takes just a few seconds so you can zip through hundreds of slides in relatively quick order. Probably the most time-consuming part of the process is post-processing for cropping and color correction as needed -- takes me longer because I spend more time than most to P/P my original digital images. Again, by doing my "scanning" of old slides this way, even with my former Pentax *istDL (only 6.1mp) -- I now have a K-5 -- I have produced images that I have used for 30x40 enlargments with excellent results that are much better than the professional 16x20 prints I used to have made from internegs.

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 17:50:48   #
lea001a Loc: Catskills Region in New York
 
Beemerboy wrote:
I am contemplating converting my vast slide collection to some digital format. I have looked at a unit called "slides to USB" for $99. It sounds like a painless process. I'm sure some, if not many, of us who grew up with good 'ol Kodachrome 64 have done something like this. If this has been previously discussed, I apologize. Would someone kindly share their experience?


I have recently purchased a CANON CanoScan 9000F II and it does a great job scanning Kodachromes (ASA 25!! and 64), Fujichromes, negatives (B&W AND color) in 35mm and 6X6 cm formats. It is thorough and tedious but it works.

Reply
Sep 21, 2015 18:11:33   #
splainittome
 
Way to go Jolly! Nothing is as amazing as common sense.

Reply
 
 
Sep 21, 2015 20:00:10   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
Bugfan wrote:
Early on I got a document scanner that included a slide adaptor. The scanner did an ok job with paper and scanning prints but when it came to doing slides it really sucked. I tried a few other offerings that were equally abysmal. I had about 25,000 slides to scan and I wasn't going to start that process until I finally had a technology that worked effectively.

This eventually led me to the Nikon scanners. Their middle model, the Super Coolscan 5000ED which is no longer available was expensive like hell but did superlative work. It also allowed me to load a batch of slides for scanning so that I didn't have to constantly feed individual slides.

Much later I also bought an Epson V750 Pro scanner. This was a flat bed instead of a film scanner but it too was designed for slides and 35mm film. What was really nice was that it also did negatives of different sizes, something I realized later I had needed too. The only down side of this scanner was that you couldn't do batch scanning. They did have a holder for a dozen or so slides but you had to place them into the frame and then dig them out later and you had to then separate each image in the scanned result. That is a pain if you have lots of slides to do.

Between these two machines all my scanning problems went away. I had control over my scanning quality and my film collections eventually went digital.

I went this route due to volume. There are a lot of services that will do the scanning for you for a price and if you're only doing a few hundred slides or negatives it's cheaper to use the services. But if you have a lot to scan it ends up a lot cheaper using the scanners instead.

Before and after acquiring these two machines I've seen other offerings for the consumer. From what I could tell most of them were toys. They would do a scan and some rather easily, but the quality always sucked. They lack the sophisticated software too and many have low resolution.

That's not to say there aren't other good scanners but make sure you go through reviews before you take a chance on one of them.

I should also add that both scanners have a driver that looks like an airplane cockpit. The Epson however, to its credit, has three views. One is fully automatic and simple, then there is one that gives you some control and it's mostly in English, and the third view is the airplane cockpit for total control. I rather like that design too.
Early on I got a document scanner that included a ... (show quote)


For my Epson 750 I bought 3 negative and 3 slide holders so while scanning one I could unload the other and load it. I have been totally satisfied with the quality and do other things while the scanning is being performed.

Reply
Sep 22, 2015 11:03:27   #
dave.speeking Loc: Brooklyn OH
 
A couple of years ago I bought an an inexpensive slide/negative scanner, under $100. 9 Mp & 7200 dpi.
It has a depth of field of about the thickness of a frog hair. I decided to make proof sheets. Much easier than
searching loose slides and negatives.
NEVER throw away any slides or negs!

Reply
Sep 22, 2015 11:37:12   #
daeod Loc: Levittown, PA
 
I just digitized over 9000 slides from 1972 to 2004. I used my Nikon d-90, nikon micro 40mm lens($160 at ebay), ( if your camera is full field sensor, use the 60mm micro), nikon ES-1 slide copying adapter( $45 on ebay), a large white board ( I have a translucent photo box and 2- 24" studio lights instead) and a solid tripod. Use live view at max enlargement for manual focus. Take each slide group, set up, DUST, slide into the adapter one at a time. It took me about an hue each day for about 1 month. Of the best to the slides, I saved them for later re-scanning with professional scanning at a much higher resolution. Out of my 9000+ slides, I saved about 1800 for later higher resolution scan!
USE RAW!!!

Reply
Sep 22, 2015 11:46:02   #
g8rfan1942 Loc: Ormond Beach Fl
 
Beemerboy wrote:
I am contemplating converting my vast slide collection to some digital format. I have looked at a unit called "slides to USB" for $99. It sounds like a painless process. I'm sure some, if not many, of us who grew up with good 'ol Kodachrome 64 have done something like this. If this has been previously discussed, I apologize. Would someone kindly share their experience?


I tried a flatbed scanner with a special slide mode and was less than happy with the results. I then came across a small device called a Kaiser Baas Photomaker and have been VERY happy with it. It was less than a hundred bucks so I suggest that you check it out. Go to www.kaiserbass.com for the info.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.