DX VS FX
Aug 23, 2015 14:22:59 #
MtnMan wrote:
The weight difference quickly becomes significant if you head out for the day down the trail or through the city. I only use my FX when I don't stray far from the vehicle or am on a moving platform (e.g. Boat).
I suppose that would be the case if I used my FX camera in DX mode, which I have never done. That would defeat the whole purpose of having a FX DSLR in the first place. I only use FX lenses like my AFS 24-70 f 1:2.8G lens or my collection of Nikkors from my film cameras.
Aug 23, 2015 15:53:41 #
As mentioned before, the big question is what type of images do you take. FX is better in low light because each pixel is larger than a similar MP DX camera, thus able to absorb more light. There is also a crop factor associated with a DX camera so if you tend to shoot more wide as opposed to long, the FX will work better with similar focal length lenses and lastly, if all of your lenses are FX then there can be a considerable cost in switching over.
The quality of sensors do not really differ based on size so that shouldn't be a factor. Certainly the quality of the image can differ with the size depending on the conditions you are shooting.
I like to shoot wide and I shoot a lot with existing light so an FX makes the most sense for me, but there are drawbacks with an FX of which many were mentioned above. They are heavier, they can be much more expensive and if you often shoot wildlife the crop factor on the DX will probably suit you better.
The quality of sensors do not really differ based on size so that shouldn't be a factor. Certainly the quality of the image can differ with the size depending on the conditions you are shooting.
I like to shoot wide and I shoot a lot with existing light so an FX makes the most sense for me, but there are drawbacks with an FX of which many were mentioned above. They are heavier, they can be much more expensive and if you often shoot wildlife the crop factor on the DX will probably suit you better.
Aug 23, 2015 23:44:44 #
kfoo wrote:
I am thinking about upgrading cameras. Does it make sense to spend the extra money to go FX format or stay with DX format?
FX does make superior images. If you have some FX lenses,
I'd say, go for it.
It was an easy decision for me though, as I had not invested in any DX lenses; going from the little 1/1.7" 6th generation Super CCD sensor
equipped Fujifilm bridgey as I did.
And saying "going from" my Fujifilm is not exactly precise
as I still use it for macros & documentary stuff.
Aug 24, 2015 01:38:38 #
joer wrote:
It may not make you a better photographer but the potential is there if you take advantage of it.
With all due respect, I have a hard time believing a full frame camera will make anyone a better photographer. That is like saying if I buy better pots, I will be a better cook; or I will be a better driver if I have a better car.
Aug 24, 2015 02:05:22 #
Shoot Happens wrote:
No, but if you have the right tool for a particular job, it can make the job easier, with more options for creating something specific.With all due respect, I have a hard time believing a full frame camera will make anyone a better photographer. That is like saying if I buy better pots, I will be a better cook; or I will be a better driver if I have a better car.
Purpose built pots can make a difference in a being easier to make a gourmet meal vs something to simply fill your tummy. Or how much better it is to drive a nice car on a long hot trip in A/C vs. just getting there.
Like using Craftsman (or another high quality tool) verses Harbor Freight and tool substandard stuff. They both may get the job done, but the highest quality tool won't do a person any good if they don't know how to use them and a serious mechanic won't use substandard tools or a pair of pliers where a wrench is more suited.
Aug 24, 2015 02:56:10 #
Shoot Happens wrote:
With all due respect, I have a hard time believing a full frame camera will make anyone a better photographer. That is like saying if I buy better pots, I will be a better cook; or I will be a better driver if I have a better car.
RTFQ=1/2TBA!
"It may not make you a better photographer"
Aug 24, 2015 03:11:17 #
Jimbo8 wrote:
Kind of true. I somewhat regret selling my D7000 and getting a D610. I love the D610, but it's heavy. So I also purchased a D5200 for traveling. The DX camera weight is a little lighter: but most comparable lenses, the lens & camera package is quite a bit lighter.
For most amateurs, a high-quality crop-sensor camera is plenty. But he should go for the FF if he thinks he will regret it later. You are correct about that.
For most amateurs, a high-quality crop-sensor camera is plenty. But he should go for the FF if he thinks he will regret it later. You are correct about that.
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: I agree. I am an amateur and my D5300 is perfect for me. I have no need nor desire to lug around a full frame camera and lenses. To each his own.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.