Frank the little rat!
Aug 11, 2015 12:03:41 #
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Are you the judge, the only judge of what is right and wrong?
That's just a nonsensical reply. My post had nothing to do with passing judgement on the POTUS. Your response is enlightening however.
Aug 11, 2015 12:05:12 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Another perspective on the same thought.
Perhaps one might say, Liberals prefer to follow the rules, while some conservatives prefer lawless vigilantism like the KKK?
Perhaps one might say, Liberals prefer to follow the rules, while some conservatives prefer lawless vigilantism like the KKK?
This is the attic - what rules ?
Aug 11, 2015 12:13:23 #
I just want to thank everyone on here for keeping "Frank the little rat" near or at the top of the topic list for two days now! WooHoo!
Aug 11, 2015 12:14:06 #
lol...
idaholover wrote:
I just want to thank everyone on here for keeping "Frank the little rat" near or at the top of the topic list for two days now! WooHoo!
Aug 11, 2015 12:15:48 #
Aug 11, 2015 12:21:20 #
yvw
idaholover wrote:
Thanks for the standing O Art!
Aug 11, 2015 12:39:40 #
thom w wrote:
I think you need to re evaluate your evidence. Or, use bad language on Idaho and 9 other people of your choosing and see who turns you in first. Anytime your "evidence" suggests that Idaho is an adult it's time to start the research over.
aren't you one of the tattlers? LOL
Never said Tater was an adult. How could you come up with that based on what I said.
Is that divert, redefine, and redeploy debate strategy?
Aug 11, 2015 13:33:06 #
Almost had that perfect alliteration going ... lol
mwalsh wrote:
aren't you one of the tattlers? LOL
Never said Tater was an adult. How could you come up with that based on what I said.
Is that divert, redefine, and redeploy debate strategy?
Never said Tater was an adult. How could you come up with that based on what I said.
Is that divert, redefine, and redeploy debate strategy?
Aug 11, 2015 13:33:25 #
thom w wrote:
I'm proud to be her friend.
quite an accomplishment thom :lol: :lol: :lol:
Aug 11, 2015 13:35:40 #
ArtzDarkroom wrote:
Almost had that perfect alliteration going ... lol
I was thinking a little Haiku maybe! :thumbup:
Aug 11, 2015 13:37:41 #
hondo812 wrote:
quite an accomplishment thom :lol: :lol: :lol:
It has taken almost eight years for the bar to get that low. There may be help yet!
Aug 11, 2015 13:50:47 #
thom w wrote:
I think you need to re evaluate your evidence. Or, use bad language on Idaho and 9 other people of your choosing and see who turns you in first. Anytime your "evidence" suggests that Idaho is an adult it's time to start the research over.
thom, err Tevye, you are and continue to be a loser on here. You have a whiney attitude that probably went over great when you were 5 but adults don't like it. That's why people here shit all over you.
You don't like Idaho? Get over yourself. He is one of the more prominent posters (starts threads) around here and also converses in english. Your contribution it seems is to vacillate incoherently or offer your opinions up as facts. Both go over like lead balloons.
You need to do more "I think" and a lot less of "I feel". Cowboy up!
Aug 11, 2015 17:19:18 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
mwalsh wrote:
aren't you one of the tattlers? LOL
Never said Tater was an adult. How could you come up with that based on what I said.
Is that divert, redefine, and redeploy debate strategy?
Never said Tater was an adult. How could you come up with that based on what I said.
Is that divert, redefine, and redeploy debate strategy?
It started out with Idaho turning me in for language because I copied and pasted from an unsolicited PM from him and the quote contained foul language. The next time he PMd me in such a manor I copied and pasted to admin as I didn't have the option of simply out ing him. I guess there is probably a rule somewhere about it only being OK to use the Admin if you are RWNJ. It's a privately owned forum so such rules are allowed but it would have saved time if Admin had these rules posted.
Aug 11, 2015 17:23:36 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
hondo812 wrote:
thom, err Tevye, you are and continue to be a lose... (show quote)
You are such a disappointment. I usually expect better from an engineer. If I remember right, not long ago, you were criticizing me for qualifying statements with "I think" or "I believe". Now you are saying I should use such qualifiers. Could you make up your mind?
Aug 11, 2015 19:37:12 #
thom w wrote:
You are such a disappointment. I usually expect better from an engineer. If I remember right, not long ago, you were criticizing me for qualifying statements with "I think" or "I believe". Now you are saying I should use such qualifiers. Could you make up your mind?
Tom, don't bend to anyone here, be yourself. You *never* have to explain yourself to anybody, except Admin. Some of these guys on here think they've accomplished something when they can insult somebody they don't agree with. It shows the level of their intelligence. Remember, you don't owe anyone a damn thing!
...oh, and always remember this little goodie...you know how they always say Dems are getting free this, free that? Remind Pounder how he takes money under the table, without paying taxes. What a mooch!
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.