Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
Tamron 150-600mm vs. Canon 100-400 II bird photos.
Page <prev 2 of 2
Mar 25, 2015 17:22:08   #
ronjay Loc: york Pa.
 
Your work is always stunning. I think the Canon 100-400mm II shots are more natural looking. I also have the Tam 150-600mm & Canon 100-400mm and like what i am seeing of the new II 400. The 23"-30" focusing sounds awesome.

Reply
Mar 25, 2015 17:34:34   #
washy Loc: Dorset UK
 
Regis wrote:
I rented a Canon 100-400mm II and compared those shots against my Tamron 150-600mm lens using my Canon 7D Mk2 camera. They are about equal in sharpness and quality. The Canon 100-400 II photos are sharp but smaller than the Tamron 150-600mm photos which are larger and sharp.
The Canon 100-400 II lens is smaller and lighter and has the fastest focusing I have ever seen. Great lens, but you will pay about $2,200 for it. It's easily hand held, you really don't need a tripod. Rugged and water resistant, etc. I still like my Tamron for it's reach and sharpness and is about half the price of the Canon.
First 3 photos are taken with the Tamron and the last 3 photos are taken with the Canon. All are at 600mm. I know these photos are subjective because the birds are not a static target.
The Canon 100-400mm shots were all at 400mm.
The skies were cloudy with rain today.
I rented a Canon 100-400mm II and compared those s... (show quote)


Great work as usual Regis. Bearing in mind the Canon 100-400 mk 2 costs double what the Tamron does I wonder how Tamron have produced such a good lens for the money. How ever I am wondering now that the Canon 100-400 mk 1 will cost about the same or slightly less than the Tamron albeit 2nd Hand, I wonder how that Canon will compare to the Tamron. I have a good mind to rent one and try it the same way you have Regis. If I do now that spring and better light and more birds are starting to show, I will let you know the outcome.

Reply
Mar 25, 2015 18:12:45   #
Regis Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
 
Caysnowman wrote:
I

Thanks Regis for this interesting topic and the pics. Really nice work as usual.

Bill


Your welcome, Bill. If I didn't have a nice income tax refund, I wouldn't be buying the Canon 100-400 II.

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Mar 25, 2015 18:59:02   #
Caysnowman Loc: MN & SC
 
Regis wrote:
Your welcome, Bill. If I didn't have a nice income tax refund, I wouldn't be buying the Canon 100-400 II.


I need to get the name of your accountant :D

Bill

Reply
Mar 25, 2015 19:28:54   #
Regis Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
 
Caysnowman wrote:
I need to get the name of your accountant :D

Bill


The AARP ( I'm retired ) did my return for free. They will do any one's Income Tax, regardless of your age if it's uncomplicated (no stocks, bonds, etc.) and you have less than $60,000-$70,000 income a year.

Reply
Mar 25, 2015 20:45:59   #
Caysnowman Loc: MN & SC
 
Regis wrote:
The AARP ( I'm retired ) did my return for free. They will do any one's Income Tax, regardless of your age if it's uncomplicated (no stocks, bonds, etc.) and you have less than $60,000-$70,000 income a year.


Thanks for the info, Bill

Reply
Mar 25, 2015 21:31:35   #
Regis Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
 
Caysnowman wrote:
Thanks for the info, Bill


Your welcome.

Reply
Check out Film Photography section of our forum.
Mar 25, 2015 21:39:56   #
BrentHarder Loc: Southern California
 
Regis, I bought the Tamron after you posted your photos of the lake scene. I was amazed at how sharp it was. I'm still very happy with it and thank you for sharing your thoughts on the two lenses. You could easily be a great salesman for Tamron or Canon for that matter!

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 01:08:39   #
sailorsmom Loc: Souderton, PA
 
All are beautiful shots, Regis!

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 01:16:53   #
Regis Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
 
BrentHarder wrote:
Regis, I bought the Tamron after you posted your photos of the lake scene. I was amazed at how sharp it was. I'm still very happy with it and thank you for sharing your thoughts on the two lenses. You could easily be a great salesman for Tamron or Canon for that matter!


Thank you, Brent. I will still use the Tamron 150-600mm most of the time because it is a great lens for $1,069.00. It has the reach and sharpness. I have many lenses like a lot of people have and the new Canon 100-400mm II will be a happy addition, but it will not replace my Tamron.

Reply
Mar 26, 2015 01:18:42   #
Regis Loc: Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
 
sailorsmom wrote:
All are beautiful shots, Regis!


Thank you, Al & Sue, for your looking at my photos and your always nice comments.

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2015 01:45:30   #
worldguy03
 
I was at my favorite local camera store in Santa Ana the other day & talked to one of the knowledgeable salesmen. His comments to me were pretty much what Regis illustrated. Can't see spending an extra $1000 for the Canon.
I sold my old 100-400 to buy the Tamron and have put any doubt about my decision to rest.

Has anyone done any micro adjustments with the Tamron on a 7D II ? Any improvement?
Lowell

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.
Photo Gallery
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.