This is one crazy m----- f------ lawmaker with a very sick & twisted mind
Feb 13, 2015 11:58:45 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
idaholover wrote:
BTW, I am not well versed in gaming the system like some welfare rat! I always thought this country stood for equal opportunity. It appears we have been categorized, divided up and can no longer speak with one voice. That's the problem with the ACA or any government program.
ACA was a way for people to have access to group policies that didn't have this access before. They didn't invent anything.
Feb 13, 2015 12:01:59 #
thom w wrote:
ACA was a way for people to have access to group policies that didn't have this access before. They didn't invent anything.
Couldn't prove it by my personal experience. Also, you are in for a rude awaken regarding your employer policy.
Feb 13, 2015 12:04:11 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
idaholover wrote:
Couldn't prove it by my personal experience. Also, you are in for a rude awaken regarding your employer policy.
I just got my stuff for 2015 and it is the same as 2014.
I pay less at Kaiser than Kaiser employees pay. I don't pay anything for my policy for me and my wife.
Feb 13, 2015 12:06:02 #
thom w wrote:
I just got my stuff for 2015 and it is the same as 2014.
That's because you are in a union and the non union workers got f_____ to subsidize yours. But then you are ok with that.
Feb 13, 2015 12:07:46 #
thom w wrote:
I just got my stuff for 2015 and it is the same as 2014.
I pay less at Kaiser than Kaiser employees pay. I don't pay anything for my policy for me and my wife.
I pay less at Kaiser than Kaiser employees pay. I don't pay anything for my policy for me and my wife.
Well then that makes you a little trough diving union piglet then doesn't it? Nothing is free, somebody pays!
Feb 13, 2015 12:09:31 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
idaholover wrote:
That's because you are in a union and the non union workers got f_____ to subsidize yours. But then you are ok with that.
My employer pays the union the union pays Kaiser how is anyone getting screwed? And just because I know you are interested I'm not at work right now. The employer obviously thinks it's worth it. If my paying a little more would in some way mean more people would have health coverage I would be OK with it.
Feb 13, 2015 12:10:49 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
idaholover wrote:
Well then that makes you a little trough diving union piglet then doesn't it? Nothing is free, somebody pays!
The company I work for must be profitable enough that they are good with it.
Feb 13, 2015 12:11:50 #
thom w wrote:
The company I work for must be profitable enough that they are good with it.
They don't need to be good with anything, you are getting a pass on the backs of others.
Feb 13, 2015 12:44:12 #
thom w
Loc: San Jose, CA
idaholover wrote:
They don't need to be good with anything, you are getting a pass on the backs of others.
If it wasn't profitable for the company to use union engineers they wouldn't be doing it. My job can not be shipped off shore.
Feb 13, 2015 12:58:07 #
WNC Ralf
Loc: Candler NC, in the mountains!
idaholover wrote:
The government doesn't create jobs, the private sector does. A good percentage of Tea Party activists are business owners! Something Obama or Biden wouldn't know anything about.
The government CAN create jobs if the want to, we have bridges collapsing, and roads in need of repair etc., but that doesn't help the rich so so the party of Dick (Nixon) only cares about limiting voting and telling women what they should do with their bodies etc....
Feb 13, 2015 13:44:15 #
thom w wrote:
ACA was a way for people to have access to group policies that didn't have this access before. They didn't invent anything.
Then why didn't they JUST fix that? Why create this overbearing, overreaching juggernaut with consequences we are just beginning to realize?
Come on... "We have to pass this to see what's in it..." Really? You cannot deny that that is absolutely absurd.
Feb 13, 2015 14:06:12 #
We should have passed a single-payer system. Expand access to the same one most of the geezers on here already use.
skylane5sp wrote:
Then why didn't they JUST fix that? Why create this overbearing, overreaching juggernaut with consequences we are just beginning to realize?
Come on... "We have to pass this to see what's in it..." Really? You cannot deny that that is absolutely absurd.
Come on... "We have to pass this to see what's in it..." Really? You cannot deny that that is absolutely absurd.
Feb 13, 2015 14:36:31 #
nakkh wrote:
I think a thorough audit of his laptop would reveal his sexual obsession with women's clothing.... It won't be pretty....
I bet he is wearing panties!
Feb 13, 2015 14:40:28 #
thom w wrote:
If it wasn't profitable for the company to use union engineers they wouldn't be doing it. My job can not be shipped off shore.
Wowzer thommy, just how many threads are you regurgitating your tripe on? Whew, you are getting redundant there my little good buddy! :lol:
Feb 13, 2015 15:18:53 #
Rbode
Loc: Ft lauderdale, Fla
nakkh wrote:
We should have passed a single-payer system. Expand access to the same one most of the geezers on here already use.
FYI: http://www.freedomworks.org/content/vermont-nixes-single-payer-healthcare-because-socialism-ridiculously-expensive
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.