Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Need help from long time digital shooters
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
Jan 21, 2015 18:53:03   #
Bugfan Loc: Toronto, Canada
 
I do a variety of photo seminars. I begin each session advising my audience that I don't have a clue how to set their cameras, each camera is often different making it impossible to know. In the seminar description the same thing is said. The audience is expected to bring their manuals.

After the session I will stay behind if someone wants to learn how to navigate their camera menus and having the camera and the manual there at the time, that's relatively easy for me. After all the key issues and settings generally have the same names in all brands.

During the session I do talk about various settings why they are needed and what they're good for but it remains the responsibility of the student to eventually figure out how to make the setting.

I also do field trips sometimes and the rules remain the same. We'll look at something in the field and I may make suggestions on what kinds of settings to consider but again the students have to know how to make the settings, I don't do that for them.

Keep in mind that you're trying to teach photography, not how to use individual cameras. So if you stay at that level you'll be fine.

Where I have a problem is when a friend asks me to teach him or her how to use their personal camera which could be a point and shoot or an SLR and often a brand I know nothing about. When that happens I'll download the manual and look it through. After I'll sit down with my friend and teach how the camera is used.

Reply
Jan 21, 2015 19:40:32   #
katkase Loc: Grapeview, WA
 
Hi, I found out that I can go to the manufacturers website and download the manuals of cameras I am interested in. It is better than buying so many cameras and it gives you a way to study the different features of the camera. cheaper too.

Reply
Jan 21, 2015 19:45:38   #
frozenhermitphoto
 
Apaflo wrote:
When you "zoom in" the framing changes, not the perspective. Basic physics, and well known to people that do understand photography. It is widely misunderstood by many photographers.

Relative distances are what cause the compression you speak of. As long as you stay in the same spot there will be no change in compression as the focal length is changed. If you are 100 feet from an object where a second object is at 110 feet, no matter what focal length you shoot with they will seem very close to each other. If you move up to where the first object is 10 feet away and the second is 20 feet from the camera they will seem far apart, again no matter what focal length lens you choose.

Really do Google it!
When you "zoom in" the framing changes, ... (show quote)


First, I would like to thank you for validating my point. Zoom compression is a matter of relative distance; when you stand farther from subject and zoom in, the background appears to be closer to the subject because of the relative difference between the two objects. I never mention a change of perspective; did you pull that out of thin air?

Since I cannot provide a hot link to the texts I have read, I did google it (Yahoo actually) and the first thing that came up was this article, with photographs included so that even people like I can understand it.

http://www.photocrati.com/the-curious-case-of-lens-compression/

Whether or not you think this phenomenon is aptly named, this is what is commonly referred to by photographers world wide as zoom compression, even though the effects can be duplicated by using two different focal length primes.

You may think I misunderstand this phenomenon because I did not say "back up and zoom in" in the original reply, but I didn't think I had to. Didn't realize I was speaking to a troll lawyer.

So bite me! :hunf:

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2015 20:37:14   #
Raz Theo Loc: Music City
 
You may think I misunderstand this phenomenon because I did not say "back up and zoom in" in the original reply, but I didn't think I had to. Didn't realize I was speaking to a troll lawyer.

So bite me! :hunf:[/quote]

Pompous, arrogant, thin-skinned, insecure and churlish behavior, masked by a sneering disrespect and a pseudo intellectual veneer, tends to invite negative response. But you sir, in spite of this assholiness, have managed to garner some thoughtful and supportive advice from some of the more remarkable photographic minds available. And you don't even know it.
I left out "pitiful". (You can call me your "troll shrink")

Reply
Jan 21, 2015 20:50:21   #
frozenhermitphoto
 
Raz Theo wrote:
You may think I misunderstand this phenomenon because I did not say "back up and zoom in" in the original reply, but I didn't think I had to. Didn't realize I was speaking to a troll lawyer.

So bite me! :hunf:


Pompous, arrogant, thin-skinned, insecure and churlish behavior, masked by a sneering disrespect and a pseudo intellectual veneer, tends to invite negative response. But you sir, in spite of this assholiness, have managed to garner some thoughtful and supportive advice from some of the more remarkable photographic minds available. And you don't even know it.
I left out "pitiful". (You can call me your "troll shrink")[/quote]

You have no idea what you are talking about; just hurling insults. Did I offend you? Awwww.... sowwy bout dat.

Reply
Jan 21, 2015 20:53:12   #
frozenhermitphoto
 
Did you notice that I did thank those that gave earnest, pertinent advice? Other come on here and insult me yet I am the asshole? You can bite me too.

Reply
Jan 21, 2015 22:40:45   #
Apaflo Loc: Anchorage, Alaska
 
frozenhermitphoto wrote:
First, I would like to thank you for validating my point. Zoom compression is a matter of relative distance; when you stand farther from subject and zoom in, the background appears to be closer to the subject because of the relative difference between the two objects. I never mention a change of perspective; did you pull that out of thin air?

Amusing. "Zoom compression" is perspective. There is no other compression. And it is distance (i.e., your location) and absolutely not focal length.

You say "when you stand farther from the subject" you nail it. When you add "and zoom in" you blow it. Zooming in doesn't change the compression. You don't need to zoom, and can take the shot with any focal length you like, but the compression will still be the same.

frozenhermitphoto wrote:
Since I cannot provide a hot link to the texts I have read, I did google it (Yahoo actually) and the first thing that came up was this article, with photographs included so that even people like I can understand it.

http://www.photocrati.com/the-curious-case-of-lens-compression/

You should have read what the guy said. He had to move back to get the second image to have the compression it shows. Just changing the lens focal length did nothing for compression.

frozenhermitphoto wrote:
Whether or not you think this phenomenon is aptly named, this is what is commonly referred to by photographers world wide as zoom compression, even though the effects can be duplicated by using two different focal length primes.

You may think I misunderstand this phenomenon because I did not say "back up and zoom in" in the original reply, but I didn't think I had to. Didn't realize I was speaking to a troll lawyer.

So bite me! :hunf:

Looks like you got bitten pretty bad...

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2015 23:58:46   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
I have an idea, perhaps goofy, but sincere. Get a job at a camera store. Paid, or see if you can hang out. You will learn a lot that way. I commend you for your desire, but I too think it's going very tough to accomplish. As a photographer for almost 50 years, I have random people come up to me and ask how to work their camera all the time. Many Nikons (what I shoot) are similar enough that I can usually at least lead them in the right direction. If the camera is a Canon, I can tell the very basics, but not much more. Good luck with your teaching endeavor.

Reply
Jan 23, 2015 00:44:53   #
dickwilber Loc: Indiana (currently)
 
frozenhermitphoto wrote:
Helping people learn how to operate the camera correctly will be part of the ciriculum. It will be essential to taking the photos they want. I want to have people out of auto mode on the second day. I want them to know the "why" for each setting, not just the "how". The first lesson will cover basic vocabulary and photographic theory, then on to assignments designed to make them experiment beyond what I walk them through.

I am not going to let a little thing like unfamiliarity with different brands deter me from teaching digital photography. The volunteer idea is great though; I can pair up people with some know how with people who are less experienced. Thanks for the suggestion.
Helping people learn how to operate the camera cor... (show quote)


Then, you are not qualified to teach this class! To become qualified will require considerable time and practice with the various brands and models of cameras available in the market. Canon, Nikon, Sony, Sigma, Fujifilm, Olympus, Samsung, Panasonic, Pentax, ... maybe someone will show up with a discontinued Minolta DSLR.

I've been shooting Nikon for a quarter of a century (film SLRs and most recently four different model DSLRs) and every new one is sufficiently different that I need to spend hours familiarizing myself with it's manual. Even then, with hundreds of thousands of Nikon DSLR exposures behind me I had to spend time last week, watching a video on how to use a specific function!

I've been taking photos for over six decades and have made a living behind a camera. I suspect I could teach a course on photography, but not if I had to become familiar with the operation of all the cameras students might show up with.

I apologize for being brutal in my assessment, but I feel strongly that you are asking too much of yourself. But, if you could find someone who works in a camera shop and is familiar with the basics of operating many different camera models to assist with the first class or two, then your mission might return to the realm of the possible!

I also apologize for jumping in before following this thread through before jumping in. I just felt very strongly that you were creating an impossible challenge. Good luck.

Reply
Jan 23, 2015 12:16:24   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
Cibafan wrote:
I suggest you teach photography basics and tell each student to study their owners manual. Teaching a class of several people how to operate their own camera's will leave little time for composition, depth of field, exposure, white balance, effects of light and when it occurs in nature.


I agree. It's not feasible for one person to know all the menu systems of all brands of cameras and all models within each brand. Most of us have a hard enough time remembering one menu system.

Reply
Jan 23, 2015 12:27:21   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
frozenhermitphoto wrote:
Gee, what a novel idea. I hadn't thought of telling people to read their owner's manual. Not everyone retains 100% of what they read, and if the need arises to remind someone of how to access a setting on a d5100 then I will look like some kind of jerk telling them to whip out their manual.

If I were paying to have someone teach me, and they told me that, I would lose confidence in their abilities. In Northern Michigan the word of mouth factor is very important; customer satisfaction is essential to survival. I want people to enjoy the class, and inspire them to learn the camera functions to support their quest for being a photographer, not make them afraid to ask questions because they know I will recite "RTM" constantly.

Thank you for your input. Do you have any advice in regards to the request I made in the original post?
Gee, what a novel idea. I hadn't thought of telli... (show quote)


It seems you're starting to become a little bit snippy here. Please realize that what you plan on doing in person is what many of us do here on UHH every day - teach newbies. It takes a cast of hundreds here to retain all the information on all camera brands and models to intelligently answer newbie questions. Even then some resort to Internet research and giving a link in their reply to helpfully provide an answer.

You are setting yourself up for standing in a classroom with your pants down regularly as your students intentionally try to stump you with questions you can't possibly answer because no one human is a walking encyclopedia of knowledge of all brands. Companies train store employees and company reps for weeks and weeks on one brand so they can answer public questions. In your "word of mouth" northern Michigan environment, I'd think you'd know better than to attempt this because you know what the outcome is going to be.

Reply
 
 
Jan 23, 2015 15:57:59   #
cambriaman Loc: Central CA Coast
 
I would avoid the individual characteristics and controls of each unique brand. Teach Photography. I agree the students should be asked to study their own cameras manual for application information. You should teach the elements of exposure, what white balance and how it changes the image, what color temperature means. The concepts of depth of field, bracketing, zone focusing etc should be explained. You will be in a hopelesss morass of details unique to given camera brands and of no valuer except to the person whose camera you are addressing, everyone else will be bored or at least distracted. I have taught photography and found sticking to basics is the only was get get a positive result.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 6
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.