mldavis2 wrote:
I always seem to run counter to the crowd on some of these questions, so as one who has gone "both ways" on the printer question, here's something to think about:
If you print for fun or for a hobby, printers are not economical, especially if you are generating handfulls of 4x6 or 5x7 prints. The cost of printer ink is outrageous, even if you run tanks instead of cartridges. It also depends on the final use of those prints - yourself or others, proofs or final prints, hobby or professional, today or tomorrow - and the size of your bank account.
I threw color printers out several years ago. Yes, it's fun to see those prints come alive in minutes, but that wears off. Consider using a high volume source such as Costco, WalMart, Walgreens, etc. (in the U.S.) which produce good (if not great) color fidelity, and are much cheaper than you can possibly print at home. For my larger prints and serious public viewing work, I use a pro lab such as MPix (again, in the U.S.). Your needs may vary, but the only printer I have is a good B&W laser printer, and I haven't missed color printers for several years.
I always seem to run counter to the crowd on some ... (
show quote)
Prints give you valuable feedback on technique that are often lost on an LCD. They often reveal flaws not seen on a LCD like small sensor dust. They also render better resolution than most of today's LCDs. You are correct to weigh the pros and cons but printing cannot be weighted on cost alone.