Is Darwinian evolution science? (Page 4): HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA your a nut case.

silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.

Racmanaz wrote:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ey6k9a-z8UI

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA your a nut case.

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Racmanaz wrote:

Dr Scott Todd, an immunologist at Kansas State University:

Even if all the data point to an intelligent designer, such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not naturalistic
Reference

Todd, S.C., correspondence to Nature 401(6752):423, 30 Sept. 1999.

Pray tell us more about Dr Scott Todd................

"As a passionate follower of Jesus Christ, Scott left academic research to join Compassion International in 2003. Scott has spoken in churches, conferences, workshops and leadership events across Africa, Asia and Latin America as well as in the U.S., and has been featured in nationwide TV and radio news interviews.

He champions the importance of children, the criticality of the church and the centrality of Christ. He believes that his generation of Christ-followers will eradicate extreme global poverty."

Impartial observer.....or bible thumper ? ? ?

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

slocumeddie wrote:

Pray tell us more about Dr Scott Todd................ (show quote)

This is not about the author as much as it is about the truth of his message. His statement is in fact completely true, no if's and or buts about it. The atheist scientific community by definition has rejected any non material truths in the science field. This is why they are falling behind and creation science is gaining ground and atheists will be left behind.

slocumeddie Loc: Inside your head, again

Racmanaz wrote:

This is not about the author as much as it is about the truth of his message. His statement is in fact completely true, no if's and or buts about it. The atheist scientific community by definition has rejected any non material truths in the science field. This is why they are falling behind and creation science is gaining ground and atheists will be left behind.

Thanks Rac.....What is a non material truth in the science field...???

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

Racmanaz wrote:

...creation science is gaining ground and atheists will be left behind.

Creation science is only gaining ground in the sense that there is more and more REAL SCIENCE for them to refute.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

slocumeddie wrote:

Thanks Rac.....What is a non material truth in the science field...???

Non material is not permitted or Admissible as evidence in science by definition even when it is true. So to answer your question, there is no non material evidence in the main stream scientific community that relates to the possibility of creation by a non material agent....whether it is God or any other non material agent.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

Creation science is only gaining ground in the sense that there is more and more REAL SCIENCE for them to refute.

LOL not even close buddy, the pendulum trajectory of science discoveries have actually been in the direction of Creation and away from naturalism. What has been troubling for the atheist is the discoveries of the complexity of the universe and life, especially the micro world.

OldDoc Loc: New York

Racmanaz wrote:

LOL not even close buddy, the pendulum trajectory of science discoveries have actually been in the direction of Creation and away from naturalism. What has been troubling for the atheist is the discoveries of the complexity of the universe and life, especially the micro world.

The increasing recognition of the complexity of the universe and of life is not troubling - in fact, it is exciting and fills me with joy. especially when I see that all that we learn in biology is 100% consistent with the concept of evolution, although sometimes we have to tweak an idea here of there, but hey, that's science.

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

OldDoc wrote:

The increasing recognition of the complexity of the universe and of life is not troubling - in fact, it is exciting and fills me with joy. especially when I see that all that we learn in biology is 100% consistent with the concept of evolution, although sometimes we have to tweak an idea here of there, but hey, that's science.

that the innate problem with rac... he want's answers carved in stone, nothing tweakable.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

OldDoc wrote:

The increasing recognition of the complexity of the universe and of life is not troubling - in fact, it is exciting and fills me with joy. especially when I see that all that we learn in biology is 100% consistent with the concept of evolution, although sometimes we have to tweak an idea here of there, but hey, that's science.

The complexity of the universe (Fine Tuning) is definitely troubling for the atheist scientists that they can't even explain why or how it happens in a non materialistic point of view, that's not exactly going there way at all. Not to mention the complexity of DNA and bacterium flagellum that the scientist are still studying, in their analysis of the DNA code information...there's no way that it happened by chance or by a material cause. Scientist know for a fact that non material information can not be produced or created by material substance. This is not my opinion but with a growing number of scientists, more on the Creationist side I do admit :).

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

that the innate problem with rac... he want's answers carved in stone, nothing tweakable.

No I don;t need answers carved in stone, I surely do not need it carved in inconsistencies of evolution science *correction made*

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

Racmanaz wrote:

No I don;t need answers carved in stone, I surely do not need it carved in inconsistencies of evolution science *correction made*

not true.... all of your answers were carved in stone, written of papyrus and printed on paper 2000 or more years ago. Creationist science will always support the Bible.

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

not true.... all of your answers were carved in stone, written of papyrus and printed on paper 2000 or more years ago. Creationist science will always support the Bible.

None of my answers were carved in stone, but they are stable in all it's ways ;)

Racmanaz Loc: Sunny Tucson!

user47602 wrote:

that the innate problem with rac... he want's answers carved in stone, nothing tweakable.

I'm sorry but the evolution theory has not only been tweaked over and over, it's been overhauled which indicates it was wrong from the start. :)

user47602 Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32

that's how science works you dummy, LOL! :lol: