Is Darwinian evolution science?
Nov 16, 2014 17:14:53 #
Nov 16, 2014 17:17:40 #
Nov 16, 2014 17:18:18 #
Nov 16, 2014 17:32:40 #
Nov 16, 2014 20:33:22 #
Does this imply that Creation is science?
Racmanaz wrote:
.......grrrrrrrrrr
Nov 16, 2014 21:28:51 #
user47602
Loc: ip 304.0.0.33.32
letmedance wrote:
science is in the eye of the beholder :lol:Does this imply that Creation is science?
Nov 16, 2014 21:31:37 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
user47602 wrote:
science is in the eye of the beholder :lol:
Hey, at least you admitted that Darwinian evolution is not scientific lol
Nov 16, 2014 21:33:49 #
Nov 17, 2014 05:44:45 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Darwinian evolution is clearly science, and clearly not religion, Eric Hovind and company notwithstanding............Is Darwinian evolution science?
Nov 17, 2014 10:03:53 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
slocumeddie wrote:
Darwinian evolution is clearly science, and clearly not religion, Eric Hovind and company notwithstanding............
nope there you go you're wrong again its not science its not observable and its not repeatable
Nov 17, 2014 10:38:15 #
RichieC
Loc: Adirondacks
Racmanaz wrote:
nope there you go you're wrong again its not science its not observable and its not repeatable
Neither is Jesus...
Nov 17, 2014 10:41:55 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
RichieC wrote:
Neither is Jesus...
You are correct, Jesus is not science....He is God Almighty and Lord of ALL creation :)
Nov 17, 2014 10:48:56 #
Racmanaz wrote:
Nope there you go you're wrong again its science and its observable.....and from another of your threads.......You are wrong, no matter what you think of it.nope there you go you're wrong again its not science its not observable and its not repeatable
Nov 17, 2014 11:23:41 #
Racmanaz
Loc: Sunny Tucson!
slocumeddie wrote:
Nope there you go you're wrong again its science and its observable.....and from another of your threads.......You are wrong, no matter what you think of it.
Lol no reputable scientist will say Darwinian evolution is scientific because its not its not observable, if it were we would be seeing macroevolution today and we don't so you are wrong again.
Nov 17, 2014 11:54:47 #
Racmanaz wrote:
OK, here I am, a reputable scientist (25 peer-reviewed papers, 3 books, multiple book chapters, a grant reviewer for the NIH, etc.), and I say that Darwinian evolution is scientific because it relies on scientific principles to describe the universe. That yahoo on the video is truly a scientific illiterate - he seems proud of the fact that he forgot the periodic table- who proceeds to lecture us about chemistry. At that point I had to stop watching for the survival of my keyboard and monitor.Lol no reputable scientist will say Darwinian evolution is scientific because its not its not observable, if it were we would be seeing macroevolution today and we don't so you are wrong again.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.