Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Having two different brands of camera
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
Nov 16, 2014 17:02:58   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
WereWolf1967 wrote:
Do you still have any Leica cameras/lenses?


I do not. But I am always looking for an excellent condition M3 or M4 and a 50mm Summicron to go with it. My last was an M7 with the 50mm Summicron. Presently I am saving money for other things. One day I would love to have an M9. I think I could be very happy with that one. All it takes is $$$$.

Dennis

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 17:11:24   #
Odie-Jay Loc: Was Littleton, CO now Overland Park, KS
 
Dml1127 wrote:
I would like to know if anyone owns a Canon and a Nikon. I have a t3i and a few lenses, Tamron 18-270, Canon 70-300, nifty-fifty and the 18-55 kit lens. I shoot in manual but sometimes put the ISO on automatic. My sister-in-law has a Nikon 3200 with a kit lens and shoots in nothing but automatic. Her pictures have such better clarity than mine to. I have to post process most to get to where hers are. So it's either my not knowing what the heck I'm doing or is the Nikon known for taking sharper pictures? I was thinking of buying a Nikon 7100 and having both. I realize the lenses won't be interchangeable. Any advice? This is not a " Canon vs Nikon question". Thank you.
I would like to know if anyone owns a Canon and a ... (show quote)



I have the T3i and the D3200. I cannot distinguish any difference in clarity when I do my part. Use both in programmed, shutter and aperture modes as well as sometimes manual and auto. I find that soft (not sharp) images are most often a lack of good technique on my part ie movement of camera or not using a tripod when I should have.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 17:37:41   #
WereWolf1967 Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
dennis2146 wrote:
I do not. But I am always looking for an excellent condition M3 or M4 and a 50mm Summicron to go with it. My last was an M7 with the 50mm Summicron. Presently I am saving money for other things. One day I would love to have an M9. I think I could be very happy with that one. All it takes is $$$$.

Dennis


I just sold my M9P, 50 series3 Summicron, 90 f/2 Summicron, 21 f/2.8 6 bit, 40 f/2 M-Rokkor and 135 3.4 APO.

I just couldn't get into a manual focus digital rangefinder. I love my "R-series" SLR's and my point and shoot digital Leicas. I especially love my Digilux 3 4/3rds with the 14~50 Vario Elmarit 2.8~3.5. That is a Moose of a camera & it feels great.

I'm a professional Roofing & Waterproofing Consultant so I travel all over the eastern half of the US. I pick up Leicas all the time. Let me know what you want & what your financial limits are and I'll look out for some equipment for you.

Right now, I have 54 cameras most are for my collections.

The money I got from the M9P & Lenses I got a DF black body with a 50 f/1.4 AFD Nikkor, 17~35 AFD Nikkor and a 80~400 AFD Nikkor. & change. The DF has a large learning curve. Even though I've shot Nikons since my first Nikon F Photomic T that I bought for myself while I was in Marine Corps Officers Basic in 1965. I still have it along with the 50 1.4 SC Nikkor lens. They made 3 tours in Vietnam in 66~67 & 68 albeit in the cockpit of my F-4 Phantom but they're in great shape considering. Even the meter works & is within 1/2 stop of my Gossen Ultra-Pro.

Togetherness-Leica D-Lux 4
Togetherness-Leica D-Lux 4...
(Download)

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2014 18:13:57   #
WereWolf1967 Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
Here's a Selfie with His Majesty "Spike" on my chair back.
Camera was a Nikon Coolpix L22

Selfie with His Majesty "Spike" on the back of my chair-Nikon L22 Coolpix
Selfie with His Majesty "Spike" on the back of my ...
(Download)

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 18:24:56   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
WereWolf1967 wrote:
I just sold my M9P, 50 series3 Summicron, 90 f/2 Summicron, 21 f/2.8 6 bit, 40 f/2 M-Rokkor and 135 3.4 APO.

I just couldn't get into a manual focus digital rangefinder. I love my "R-series" SLR's and my point and shoot digital Leicas. I especially love my Digilux 3 4/3rds with the 14~50 Vario Elmarit 2.8~3.5. That is a Moose of a camera & it feels great.

I'm a professional Roofing & Waterproofing Consultant so I travel all over the eastern half of the US. I pick up Leicas all the time. Let me know what you want & what your financial limits are and I'll look out for some equipment for you.

Right now, I have 54 cameras most are for my collections.

The money I got from the M9P & Lenses I got a DF black body with a 50 f/1.4 AFD Nikkor, 17~35 AFD Nikkor and a 80~400 AFD Nikkor. & change. The DF has a large learning curve. Even though I've shot Nikons since my first Nikon F Photomic T that I bought for myself while I was in Marine Corps Officers Basic in 1965. I still have it along with the 50 1.4 SC Nikkor lens. They made 3 tours in Vietnam in 66~67 & 68 albeit in the cockpit of my F-4 Phantom but they're in great shape considering. Even the meter works & is within 1/2 stop of my Gossen Ultra-Pro.
I just sold my M9P, 50 series3 Summicron, 90 f/2 S... (show quote)


Wow, you have quite a collection of cameras. I prefer having just a few but I sometimes lust for another. When/if I get some money saved I will let you know and maybe you could find something for me. I generally spend my time between fishing, hunting, collecting side by side shotguns and photography. Fishing is probably the cheapest hobby I have but I do have some coin wrapped up in a fly rod.

I was in Vietnam with HMM-265 from 1966 to the end of 1967 for 18 months. I would have liked to fly the CH-46 but nobody ever trained me as I was an E-4. I rode in the back hooked up to a Browning 50. Great helicopter and great gun. If you ever get a chance and the desire to read a good book, look for, "Bonnie Sue", written by one of our pilots, Marion Sturkey.

I saw my first Nikon F Photomic in 1964 when a friend brought one back from his tour in Vietnam. I loved it at first sight and bought one when I first got there. Since then I have tried other Nikons, Canon, Hassselblad, Mamiya TLR, Leica M and R, and others. All were great cameras but I stuck with Nikon through the years.

Semper Fi,

Dennis

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 18:58:56   #
WereWolf1967 Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
dennis2146 wrote:
Wow, you have quite a collection of cameras. I prefer having just a few but I sometimes lust for another. When/if I get some money saved I will let you know and maybe you could find something for me. I generally spend my time between fishing, hunting, collecting side by side shotguns and photography. Fishing is probably the cheapest hobby I have but I do have some coin wrapped up in a fly rod.

I was in Vietnam with HMM-265 from 1966 to the end of 1967 for 18 months. I would have liked to fly the CH-46 but nobody ever trained me as I was an E-4. I rode in the back hooked up to a Browning 50. Great helicopter and great gun. If you ever get a chance and the desire to read a good book, look for, "Bonnie Sue", written by one of our pilots, Marion Sturkey.

I saw my first Nikon F Photomic in 1964 when a friend brought one back from his tour in Vietnam. I loved it at first sight and bought one when I first got there. Since then I have tried other Nikons, Canon, Hassselblad, Mamiya TLR, Leica M and R, and others. All were great cameras but I stuck with Nikon through the years.

Semper Fi,

Dennis
Wow, you have quite a collection of cameras. I pr... (show quote)


Ooh-Rah, Brother. I was with VMFA 542 at DaNang from May 1966 to November 66 when they rotated up to Iwakuni for O&R so I got transferred to VMFA 323 at Chu-Lai until Jan 67 when I had enough time to rotate up to MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. It was in late Jan 67 that I went up on a test flight in BuNo. 151410. We had just had techs from MacDonald/Douglas install newer J79 GE 15 engines in our Bird. Less smoke & 500 lbs per engine more thrust. Hey, a win-win huh?
NOPE. Test flight went great. Our bird looked funny on the flight line with no drop tanks or hard point racks. She was clean. We went up to try and break rivets. Everything went OK until we came in at FL350 for a TACAN 1 approach. Approach Control cleared us to the 38 NM DME fix, 184 radial Iwakuni TACAN. Once there, we were cleared for the TACAN approach with a GCA hand off approach.

All was great until we passed over station at 350 and then BOTH J-79s flamed out!!!
I was flying back seat that day and I put out the RAT and called Approach Control to cancel instruments and declare an emergency. I requested a flame-out approach to runway 01 and it was approved. We went on a wide downwind trying for an air start but No-Go. We went too wide to make the runway so the Tower lit the sea drome lanes for us in the inland sea 1 mile east of the base that the sea planes used.

At 3,000 ft. I command ejected us and I went first from the RIO position but everything went wrong that could and I went through the rear canopy with a malfunctioning firing Martin-Baker Mk 5 seat. The canopy was not blown but torn loose by my seat. I broke my left collarbone in 2 places, broke 3 ribs, cracked 3 more, broke my nose, my left index finger and for good luck, smacked my left knee on the way out.

We hit the water on January 27 th 1967 and nearly froze our asses off.
Iwakuni is just about the same latitude as Chicago. It was just like landing in Lake Michigan in January!!!.

My collar bone never healed properly and so I was relieved from combat flying. I got sent back to the States and re-trained as an ATC officer. I was re-assigned to MCAS Iwakuni as the Control Tower OIC for MATCU-60 (Marine Air Traffic Control Unit-60) for almost 2 years. I had a short stint as an ATC officer at Phu-Bai in 1968. That's where I got my second purple heart when During an NVA rocket attack, I was blown through the air. I still carry 5 pieces of shrapnel adjacent to my spine as a reminder.
My first Purple heart was in 1966 in DaNang while in the head shaving for my pre-flight briefing. I got winged in the right calf and 3 days later it got infected. Our flight surgeon examined me and asked when I got shot. I told him it was during an early morning nuisance attack. I got my first purple heart for getting shot in the "crapper". How humiliating.

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 19:10:47   #
CraigFair Loc: Santa Maria, CA.
 
WereWolf1967 wrote:
Ooh-Rah, Brother. I was with VMFA 542 at DaNang from May 1966 to November 66 when they rotated up to Iwakuni for O&R so I got transferred to VMFA 323 at Chu-Lai until Jan 67 when I had enough time to rotate up to MCAS Iwakuni, Japan. It was in late Jan 67 that I went up on a test flight in BuNo. 151410. We had just had techs from MacDonald/Douglas install newer J79 GE 15 engines in our Bird. Less smoke & 500 lbs per engine more thrust. Hey, a win-win huh?
NOPE. Test flight went great. Our bird looked funny on the flight line with no drop tanks or hard point racks. She was clean. We went up to try and break rivets. Everything went OK until we came in at FL350 for a TACAN 1 approach. Approach Control cleared us to the 38 NM DME fix, 184 radial Iwakuni TACAN. Once there, we were cleared for the TACAN approach with a GCA hand off approach.

All was great until we passed over station at 350 and then BOTH J-79s flamed out!!!
I was flying back seat that day and I put out the RAT and called Approach Control to cancel instruments and declare an emergency. I requested a flame-out approach to runway 01 and it was approved. We went on a wide downwind trying for an air start but No-Go. We went too wide to make the runway so the Tower lit the sea drome lanes for us in the inland sea 1 mile east of the base that the sea planes used.

At 3,000 ft. I command ejected us and I went first from the RIO position but everything went wrong that could and I went through the rear canopy with a malfunctioning firing Martin-Baker Mk 5 seat. The canopy was not blown but torn loose by my seat. I broke my left collarbone in 2 places, broke 3 ribs, cracked 3 more, broke my nose, my left index finger and for good luck, smacked my left knee on the way out.

We hit the water on January 27 th 1967 and nearly froze our asses off.
Iwakuni is just about the same latitude as Chicago. It was just like landing in Lake Michigan in January!!!.

My collar bone never healed properly and so I was relieved from combat flying. I got sent back to the States and re-trained as an ATC officer. I was re-assigned to MCAS Iwakuni as the Control Tower OIC for MATCU-60 (Marine Air Traffic Control Unit-60) for almost 2 years. I had a short stint as an ATC officer at Phu-Bai in 1968. That's where I got my second purple heart when During an NVA rocket attack, I was blown through the air. I still carry 5 pieces of shrapnel adjacent to my spine as a reminder.
My first Purple heart was in 1966 in DaNang while in the head shaving for my pre-flight briefing. I got winged in the right calf and 3 days later it got infected. Our flight surgeon examined me and asked when I got shot. I told him it was during an early morning nuisance attack. I got my first purple heart for getting shot in the "crapper". How humiliating.
Ooh-Rah, Brother. I was with VMFA 542 at DaNang fr... (show quote)


All this reminiscing is all good but what happened to the OP.
""I would like to know if anyone owns a Canon and a Nikon"".
Craig

Reply
 
 
Nov 16, 2014 19:22:55   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
Sorry. I thought that thread was done. I read somewhere that he had traded in his Canon for a new Nikon D810 and a 35-70 f2.8 lens with the other Trinity lenses on order.

WereWolf, we can touch base later. Craig is probably right and he is my Northern neighbor.

Dennis

Reply
Nov 16, 2014 21:02:30   #
WereWolf1967 Loc: Knoxville, TN
 
CraigFair wrote:
All this reminiscing is all good but what happened to the OP.
""I would like to know if anyone owns a Canon and a Nikon"".
Craig


YEP,

I have & use both.

Reply
Nov 17, 2014 00:49:50   #
dickwilber Loc: Indiana (currently)
 
marcomarks wrote:
It's just verification that over-thinking photography and insisting on total control, instead of concentrating more on composition, doesn't always mean a better end result. Your sister-in-law has revealed this. Setting aside ego and letting the camera show you how it's done isn't so hard especially when the result makes you happy and you're visually satisfied completely.

My line of work requires me to use aperture priority and a specific aperture so I'm cranking the ISO around regularly but I know my eyes vary in accuracy from day to day and I trust my auto-focus more than I trust my eyes. It's a precise robot and I'm not. Auto focus doesn't let me down. I also trust the auto-exposure with matrix metering of 1200 points examined in the frame because I know my eyes see exposure differently every day. I look back at edited photos I've done and see differences from week to week and day to day. Auto exposure doesn't let me down either. It's a precise robot and I'm not.

I have the ability to take total control in manual mode, and had to in the days of film cameras because there was no auto anything. I just know that technology is around to help and not hinder so I take advantage of the benefits and spend my efforts mostly on composition. I don't type with a manual typewriter anymore then remove mistakes with a bottle of White Out, so why should I use all manual on my cameras? I don't.

Some people use "shooting full manual" as a guise to seem more knowledgeable, artistic, and competent but then are angry when someone with several decades less experience uses a 5-shot auto-bracketed set of frames created in semi-auto aperture mode, and puts them through Photomatix software to create an eye-popping realistic result that blows away anything they've ever shot in their lives. They want the shooter thrown out of photo competitions to make technologically-advanced methodology go away but it's not going to.

One either keeps up with technological advances while growing and improving, or voluntarily languishes in stagnation with a stove-top coffee pot, a dial phone, a B&W tube TV, a 1974 AMC Ambassador with crank windows, and a manual film camera - or operating a digital camera in manual mode while complaining that they had to pay for technology they don't use.

There... I've stoked the fire, now let's see where the first flames pop out of.
It's just verification that over-thinking photogra... (show quote)


Many years ago, I was moving from a rangefinder to my first SLR. As it happened someone I saw regularly on weekends was doing exactly the same thing. He bought an all automatic (set the shutter speed and it picked aperture) while I bought an aperture preferred auto WITH the capability to shoot fully manual. As we compared our choices, I stated that the ability to shoot manual was an important consideration in my purchase. "Hmmph!!" He responded. "Do you think you know more than the camera?"

The correct answer was of course, "Yes!" But, that said, like you, I shoot aperture preferred auto 90% of the time. I shoot a lot of people, I'm a retired sports/event/wedding photographer where shooting aperture preferred auto IS the way to go. Often going from sun to shade, and shooting pretty quickly, the "matrix metering" on my Nikons is very dependable and accurate in nearly all conditions, allowing me to concentrate on composition, et al.

The ability to determine all the settings of your instrument, and more importantly, why, is required to become a competent photographer. But to stubbornly insist that you must make all those adjustments manually, means that you are missing some of the other nuances of your art.

Reply
Nov 17, 2014 12:11:12   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
Dml1127 wrote:
I would like to know if anyone owns a Canon and a Nikon. I have a t3i and a few lenses, Tamron 18-270, Canon 70-300, nifty-fifty and the 18-55 kit lens. I shoot in manual but sometimes put the ISO on automatic. My sister-in-law has a Nikon 3200 with a kit lens and shoots in nothing but automatic. Her pictures have such better clarity than mine to. I have to post process most to get to where hers are. So it's either my not knowing what the heck I'm doing or is the Nikon known for taking sharper pictures? I was thinking of buying a Nikon 7100 and having both. I realize the lenses won't be interchangeable. Any advice? This is not a " Canon vs Nikon question". Thank you.
I would like to know if anyone owns a Canon and a ... (show quote)

Your sister probably shoots jpeg and Nikon has great algorithms for that. If you shoot RAW , manually you have to set a proper color balance and sharpen prior to exporting your image. There is a learning curve for getting proper exposure and proper sharpening. You should be able to get similar results with your camera by mastering your workflow. OR, you can set your camera to record in jpeg with a setting like saturate and see how you like the result you get.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 4
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.