Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Introduce Yourself
Might as well jump in with both feet.
Page 1 of 2 next>
Feb 27, 2012 23:24:48   #
LDM5 Loc: Templeton, MA
 
Hello all. I like this site and hope to learn a lot. So, to start with, tonight I made an attempt at a long exposure to get a picture of venus, jupiter, and the moon lined up in the western sky. mode=m, Tv=10 sec, Av=3.5, iso=1000. But, as you can see, the moon is overexposed and totally blown out. I still think it's an interesting picture but know I can do better. If anybody's got a suggestion as to how to do that please let me know.



Reply
Feb 28, 2012 00:07:15   #
RTR Loc: West Central Alabama
 
Welcome LDM5. I think you will like this place.

That is an interesting photo and a difficult subject to capture. I took one like it Saturday night and exposed for the moon. I had to adjust in photoshop to get Jupiter to show up at all.

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 05:47:02   #
Hando Rei Loc: Long Island New York
 
"Blown out " or not ,I still like the photo. My daughter has a good telescope and maybe I will try to see what I can do...thanks for the inspiration !

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2012 07:46:51   #
Bunny-Jean Loc: Wisconsin
 
Welcome!!!!

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 07:54:38   #
Al FR-153 Loc: Chicago Suburbs
 
Welcome to UHH.

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 07:55:34   #
rpavich Loc: West Virginia
 
well....if you hadn't have told me it was the moon I was going to say it was a great looking star!

Welcome!

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 08:28:52   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
Blown out moon or not, I agree that it's a great photo with a lot of interest. Your biggest problem is the brightness of the moon exceeds that of Venus and Jupiter by a range greater than the dynamic range of your camera. A properly exposed moon would barely show Venus and Jupiter would be too dim to see on the image or would show up as a couple of faint pixels.

There is a 10 magnitude (the brightness scale used by astronomers) difference between the illuminated portion of the moon and Jupiter which means the moon is about 10,000 times brighter than Jupiter.

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2012 08:29:58   #
Zerbphlatz Loc: Southern New Hampshire
 
Welcome to the forum. For what you are trying to do, you may have to stack multiple shots. I've never gotten it to work too well and I blame it on the fact that I don't have the mount that moves the camera synchronously with the earth's rotation. Registax is the software that's been recommended to me if you want to give it a try.

Good luck and if you get it working reasonably well, please let me know how you did it!

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 08:49:20   #
LDM5 Loc: Templeton, MA
 
ngc1514 wrote:
Blown out moon or not, I agree that it's a great photo with a lot of interest. Your biggest problem is the brightness of the moon exceeds that of Venus and Jupiter by a range greater than the dynamic range of your camera. A properly exposed moon would barely show Venus and Jupiter would be too dim to see on the image or would show up as a couple of faint pixels.

There is a 10 magnitude (the brightness scale used by astronomers) difference between the illuminated portion of the moon and Jupiter which means the moon is about 10,000 times brighter than Jupiter.
Blown out moon or not, I agree that it's a great p... (show quote)


Thanx for the input. I kinda figured that the brightness of the moon was the problem. Guess I can't get the photo that I was hoping for without some fancy pp (which I'm not very good at). Understanding layers blows my mind like the moon in that picture !

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 09:32:40   #
steve Loc: Iowa
 
Great shot!!!!

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 09:48:56   #
endjr Loc: Maryland
 
Welcome, I hope you enjoy the site.

Reply
 
 
Feb 28, 2012 09:52:13   #
richnash46 Loc: Texas
 
LDM5 wrote:
Hello all. I like this site and hope to learn a lot. So, to start with, tonight I made an attempt at a long exposure to get a picture of venus, jupiter, and the moon lined up in the western sky. mode=m, Tv=10 sec, Av=3.5, iso=1000. But, as you can see, the moon is overexposed and totally blown out. I still think it's an interesting picture but know I can do better. If anybody's got a suggestion as to how to do that please let me know.


I love the photo just the way it is! Great picture!

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 09:59:42   #
rfbccb Loc: Central Mississippi
 
Welcome to the "HOG". Great shot.

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 11:41:43   #
ward5311 Loc: Georgia
 
Welcome... :D

Reply
Feb 28, 2012 15:18:46   #
ngc1514 Loc: Atlanta, Ga., Lancaster, Oh. and Stuart, Fl.
 
Quote:
Thanx for the input. I kinda figured that the brightness of the moon was the problem. Guess I can't get the photo that I was hoping for without some fancy pp (which I'm not very good at). Understanding layers blows my mind like the moon in that picture !

The question you didn't answer was what kind of photo were you looking for? Frankly, I think the image that you got was excellent and the moon - overexposed and all - added a lot to it. For an image showing the 3 brightest objects visible in the nighttime sky it's pretty impressive!

If you want to get detail in the moon, there ain't no substitute for focal length. These were taken with a 2000mm f/10 cat system.







Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Introduce Yourself
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.