Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Nikon Travel Question
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
Sep 22, 2014 11:02:05   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
DavidPine wrote:
14-24, 24-70 and 70-200. Pretty simple.


I enjoy natural history subjects more than most here, so I would replace the 70-200 with the 200-400. But they are all great choices.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 11:02:51   #
Bozsik Loc: Orangevale, California
 
DavidPine wrote:
14-24, 24-70 and 70-200. Pretty simple.


I enjoy natural history subjects more than most here, so I would replace the 70-200 with the 200-400. But they are all great choices. Or the 80-400.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 11:35:53   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
deepdiverv wrote:
I would take my nikon 18-300mm and save the trouble of changing a lens and also save my shoulder in the process.


That is a DX lens. He has the 28-300 which is the DX equivalent.

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2014 11:47:54   #
romanticf16 Loc: Commerce Twp, MI
 
You have some fantastic optics, but the fast lenses have a premium of weight. Would you consider renting the f4 VR version of the 70-200? or the 16-35f4G?
Then use the 28-300 as the main lens on your D600. Add a nifty 50 and a flash to your kit and you'd be set with both bodies.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 12:00:58   #
cjc2 Loc: Hellertown PA
 
DavidPine wrote:
14-24, 24-70 and 70-200. Pretty simple.


Very simple. These are in my kit no matter when I go or what I'm shooting. At every football game I shoot, with my 400 these are with me. It just doesn't get better than these lenses! IMHO!

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 12:09:23   #
speters Loc: Grangeville/Idaho
 
DavidPine wrote:
14-24, 24-70 and 70-200. Pretty simple.



:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 12:38:25   #
Fergus Loc: Westfield,IN
 
nikonbug wrote:
Is the D600 a FX? Thought it was DX. So that might change things.


Yes it is. Actually it has menu settings that allow FX and DX.

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2014 13:00:29   #
jack schade Loc: La Pine Oregon
 
28-300 would give you a lot of range.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 13:04:37   #
Reinaldokool Loc: San Rafael, CA
 
Bluff City wrote:
I agree except I would take an 18-200 zoom


I'm very partial to the Nikon VRII 18-200. However the excellent Tamron 18-270 is excellent and weighs about 1/2 lb less, if you are carrying. (My daughter has a Tamron 18-250 and loves it. Hers does not have VC (VR), but takes great pix.

On a long trip with varied photo opportunities, not having to change lenses allows for quick response. If you have the time and inclination to change lenses, I would also take a 35mm f1.8

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 13:57:08   #
asiafish Loc: Bakersfield, CA
 
Robeng wrote:
Question for all you Hogs here.

I'm leaving for Peru on 09/22/14 and will return at the end of next month. I will be taking two Nikon bodies, a D800 & D600.

I have more lenses than I can list here.

My question is if you can take any Nikon lenses you want, but can only take three, which three would you take.

Keep in mind I have to carry all my gear.

Thanks for everyone's opinion.


Easy. AF 28mm f/2.8D mounted on the D600, AF-S 58mm f/1.4G mounted on the D800, and nothing else.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 14:05:02   #
guligian Loc: Louisville KY
 
I just returned from Peru/Amazon. Most of the wildlife is distant and I used my 300mm often. The flowers and insects require the micro lens of your choice. I used a 40mm. Enjoy---the photo ops are abundant!

Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2014 14:20:52   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
guligian wrote:
I just returned from Peru/Amazon. Most of the wildlife is distant and I used my 300mm often. The flowers and insects require the micro lens of your choice. I used a 40mm. Enjoy---the photo ops are abundant!


This is one of the reasons that I felt that he should take the 2 or 3 lenses along with his body or bodies and then find a lens/camera rental dealer somewhere close and see if they have recommendations on shooting spots and maybe rent the bigger heavier lens or gear from them so that he doesn't have to drag it though the airport etc. Also they probably deal with a lot of the locals and may have some very good connections for him. Or, he may just be another "Yankee with money" to be taken advantage of.. but it never hurts to ask.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 15:43:11   #
johneccles Loc: Leyland UK
 
I would buy a good P&S and leave all that Nikon stuff at home.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 15:49:58   #
amehta Loc: Boston
 
johneccles wrote:
I would buy a good P&S and leave all that Nikon stuff at home.

This is a good suggestion if photography is low on the priority list for the trip.

Reply
Sep 22, 2014 15:54:11   #
breck Loc: Derbyshire UK
 
For a once in a lifetime trip across the globe you will be disapointed with photographs taken with anything less than your best quality camera and lens

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.