#1. "you're showing your lack of knowledge (and ignorance)
every time you make a post, troll person!
BTW....I've been meaning to ask, but keep forgetting to.......I'm assuming that you're a dyke, right? (Only a dyke would rant on & on & on about "old white men", and "those terrible Christians".......

#2. "Bush signed a law, passed overwhelmingly (you know, not like now) by both houses of Congress making it so that the US HAS to keep anyone who is neglected, abused or abandoned".

I rather think that if you were to look into that law, you would find that it was "about" individuals, and NOT the hundred or so THOUSAND minors that have flooded to our southern border, largely because they were "lured to come there" by the efforts of Obozo and his "ilk".

And glitzy, I'll bet a dollar to a donut that Congress will cut and run home to take their vacation rather than vote on something that will allow those children to return home. Repealing the law, more border security, faster processing...all that is needed and asked for by the president. Will Congress make up a bill to implement those ideas? No, you know the answer as well as I do. This includes both parties.

This disaster is also attracting the nuts who call themselves patriots from Bundy's farm. These freeloaders have nothing to do and all day to do it in so think they can take their talents to guarding the border. What a mess!

Report: Illegals With No ID Flying Commercial Unimpeded
Friday, 11 Jul 2014 07:46 PM

Article by / By Cathy Burke


Illegal immigrants picked up after sneaking across the U.S.-Mexico border – and then released to await hearings – are reportedly getting onto commercial planes without any ID other than "a simple paper document that anyone can easily alter or reproduce."

An outraged local spokesman for the National Border Patrol Council, Hector Garza, told Breitbart News the security threat from the lax policy "is absolutely unacceptable."

Vote Now: Do you believe the Obama administration has secured our border with Mexico? Vote Now

"The aliens who are getting released on their own recognizance are being allowed to board and travel commercial airliners by simply showing their Notice to Appear [hearing] forms," he told Breitbart in an interview posted Friday.

"We do not know who these people are. We often have to solely rely on who they say they are, where they say they came from, and the history they say they have.

"We know nothing about most of them. [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] releases them into the American public, and now they are boarding aircraft at will with a simple paper document that anyone can easily alter or reproduce themselves."

Allowing them unrestricted travel access "just adds insult to injury," he said.

"Not only are we releasing unknown illegal aliens onto American streets, but we are allowing them to travel commercially using paperwork that could easily be reproduced or manipulated on any home computer," he charged.

Garza warned the practice has wider implications.

"The threat this poses from terrorists upon the American people is absolutely unacceptable," he said.

"Central Americans are not the only people crossing our border and being released. Does anyone actually think that cartels and other criminal or possible terrorist organizations are not taking advantage of the fact that we are having to leave our border wide open while we reassign the majority of our agents to process family units and minors? Of course this situation is being exploited by such threats."

The national Border Patrol Council released a statement warning the practice will worsen problems triggered by the recent influx of illegal immigrants, including some 52,000 unaccompanied children since last October.

"The National Border Patrol Council adamantly opposes the decision of [the Department of Homeland Security] to release the illegal aliens who have been transported from the Rio Grande Valley Border Patrol Sector to other locations for processing," the group stated.

"The lack of consequences has furthered this crisis and will only continue to do so. The fact that TSA is accepting the [Notice to Appear] as a form of identification and allowing illegal aliens to travel commercially shows just how little regard the federal government has for its own immigration laws."

The Transportation Security Administration didn't immediately comment to Breitbart about the report.

The revelations came just three days after President Barack Obama asked Congress for an emergency $3.7 billion to contain the surge of illegal immigrants, most from Central America, crossing into the United States from Mexico.


Comments;
You'll notice that this article doesn't mention who's paying for these "people" to fly; it also makes no mention of #1 where thay are flying from and it doesn't say where they are flying to.

Also, no mention is made what they are using for travel expenses "enroute", or where they are going to stay once they arrive at......where ever it is that they are going to.

I hadn't heard about this till just now, but I'll bet a dollar to a do nut that I can tell you exactly who is paying for all of this free air transportation. You are; that is, if you're a tax payer. Has anyone from the government asked you if you would like to "chip in" to help move hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens "around" the country?

I just noticed another news story as I was about to post this one; maybe I'll have time to post it tomorrow. Obama has just declined an offer from "the military", ( I think it's from the Army ), to "assist" in securing our southern border. Doesn't look like he's interested in sealing the border, does it?

What you say is interesting, but like so much of the noise being generated, not much is based on fact. How do you know that anything you are saying has any truth. "I heard it on Fox news or the Drudge Report" is not a good answer. Keep in mind that George Bush was preadident when Republicans and Democrats voted in the law about how unaccompanied alien children are to be processed. Obame is carrying out that law. So now the Right is accusing Obama of high crimes because he is following that law? And suppose he did not follow the law? Hey, they couuld sue or impeach him. Or both.