Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
lens calibration
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Jul 13, 2014 09:47:54   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Tom Brownell wrote:
The problem seems to be in long distance shooting, it's dead on at six feet away! Is there a test I can do for shooting at infinity? (other than just getting soft pics) Is it possible to have the lens go slightly out of focus at infinity? (like the distances between the front lens and the back lens be off a little at infinity)


Where are you trying to find infinity?
Infinity is not necessarily at the point that is turned fully around.
It is not at the same spot on every lens.
Here is a boring little film that explains it quite well.
You can skip the first 1 min 40 secs.

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 10:19:31   #
Tom Brownell Loc: Chassell, Michigan
 
lighthouse wrote:
Where are you trying to find infinity?
Infinity is not necessarily at the point that is turned fully around.
It is not at the same spot on every lens.
Here is a boring little film that explains it quite well.
You can skip the first 1 min 40 secs.

not seeing a link.

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 10:40:42   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
Tom Brownell wrote:
The problem seems to be in long distance shooting, it's dead on at six feet away! Is there a test I can do for shooting at infinity? (other than just getting soft pics) Is it possible to have the lens go slightly out of focus at infinity? (like the distances between the front lens and the back lens be off a little at infinity)


Was your focus indicator displayed when you photographed the moon?

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2014 12:47:29   #
Mr PC Loc: Austin, TX
 
This is one reason I will need to move up from the D5200 eventually. Can't believe that you need a better body to calibrate focus. Live and learn. I feel a case of G.A.S. coming on fast!

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 16:46:18   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Tom Brownell wrote:
not seeing a link.


Here it is Tom
Sorry about missing it out before.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=18CtooHEqhk

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 18:26:46   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
Mr PC wrote:
This is one reason I will need to move up from the D5200 eventually. Can't believe that you need a better body to calibrate focus. Live and learn. I feel a case of G.A.S. coming on fast!


Sorry, but focus calibration is a pro level feature.
Your D5200 is definitely NOT pro level.
You need a recent 1 or 3 digit model number for pro features.

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 18:27:06   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
Mr PC wrote:
This is one reason I will need to move up from the D5200 eventually. Can't believe that you need a better body to calibrate focus. Live and learn. I feel a case of G.A.S. coming on fast!


Sorry, but focus calibration is a pro level feature.
Your D5200 is definitely NOT pro level.
You need a recent 1 or 3 digit model number for pro features.

Reply
 
 
Jul 13, 2014 18:27:20   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
Dupe post.

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 19:00:21   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
Wall-E wrote:
Sorry, but focus calibration is a pro level feature.
Your D5200 is definitely NOT pro level.
You need a recent 1 or 3 digit model number for pro features.


Actually, the Nikon D7100 has a database of lens adjusts also. the D5300 and below do not.
In the D7100, If I am reading the question correctly, it is in the AF fine tune under setup.

And I can save up to 9 non-cpu lens datas.
Not sure if that is what you were referencing or not.

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 19:07:36   #
Wall-E Loc: Phoenix, AZ
 
dcampbell52 wrote:
Actually, the Nikon D7100 has a database of lens adjusts also. the D5300 and below do not.
In the D7100, If I am reading the question correctly, it is in the AF fine tune under setup.

And I can save up to 9 non-cpu lens datas.
Not sure if that is what you were referencing or not.


You're correct, I forgot about that model.
And I DID say 'recent', since my D200's and D2Xs don't have it either.

Reply
Jul 13, 2014 19:14:35   #
dcampbell52 Loc: Clearwater Fl
 
Wall-E wrote:
You're correct, I forgot about that model.
And I DID say 'recent', since my D200's and D2Xs don't have it either.


LOL. I was afraid I was confused and didn't want to steer anyone wrong. And, I was afraid to do too much experimenting on mine. If it aint broke, don't fix it. I did change the auto focus to back AE/L AF/L button and now I keep forgetting to press it to focus.. figures.. when I remember it works great. When I forget. it doesn't focus at all.. grrrrr.
And I keep arguing with people that say that the D7100 isn't considered a "Pro-Am" camera. Nikon does but "pure-shooters" don't. Although, I know a number of Pro's that carry it for the 1.5 and 2.0 "crop/extension".

Reply
 
 
Jul 14, 2014 06:06:46   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
Tom Brownell wrote:
Since i've been using my nikkor 55-300mm af lens, Iv'e noticed that when I shoot long distance (like moon shots) my shots are soft. I have gone to great lengths to assure that its not camera movement. (like using a tripod, remote release, etc.) I've turned off the vr, put it on manual focus and tried to manually focus. I've done about everything that I can think of to assure that it's not the operator. Is it possible the my lens needs calibration? If so, can someone guide me in getting this done?
Since i've been using my nikkor 55-300mm af lens, ... (show quote)


Looks like atmospheric interference. You should be using live view autofocus for accurate focus. The shutter speed if at least 1/500 should not be an issue. Try again, and process carefully.

Reply
Jul 14, 2014 06:14:42   #
DavidPine Loc: Fredericksburg, TX
 
I had 3 of my primary lenses calibrated to my camera at a cost of $28.50 per lens. My favorite lens (70-200 f/2.8) was set to -4 and I am quite happy with the results. Good luck.
Tom Brownell wrote:
Since i've been using my nikkor 55-300mm af lens, Iv'e noticed that when I shoot long distance (like moon shots) my shots are soft. I have gone to great lengths to assure that its not camera movement. (like using a tripod, remote release, etc.) I've turned off the vr, put it on manual focus and tried to manually focus. I've done about everything that I can think of to assure that it's not the operator. Is it possible the my lens needs calibration? If so, can someone guide me in getting this done?
Since i've been using my nikkor 55-300mm af lens, ... (show quote)

Reply
Jul 14, 2014 07:53:30   #
Teacher Loc: Alabama
 
I agree with Gene. Looks like atmosphere to me. I've found that in summer with humidity levels high, the atmosphere is full of water. I usually get much better results photographing the moon in winter time on a clear night.
Tom Brownell wrote:
Since i've been using my nikkor 55-300mm af lens, Iv'e noticed that when I shoot long distance (like moon shots) my shots are soft. I have gone to great lengths to assure that its not camera movement. (like using a tripod, remote release, etc.) I've turned off the vr, put it on manual focus and tried to manually focus. I've done about everything that I can think of to assure that it's not the operator. Is it possible the my lens needs calibration? If so, can someone guide me in getting this done?
Since i've been using my nikkor 55-300mm af lens, ... (show quote)

Reply
Jul 14, 2014 08:00:25   #
Gene51 Loc: Yonkers, NY, now in LSD (LowerSlowerDelaware)
 
DavidPine wrote:
I had 3 of my primary lenses calibrated to my camera at a cost of $28.50 per lens. My favorite lens (70-200 f/2.8) was set to -4 and I am quite happy with the results. Good luck.


David, has the adjustment affected focus at other distances/zoom levels? Was it done by the camera manufacturer?

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.