Basil wrote:
I just subscribed to Creative Cloud and have access to both LR and PS.
Seems LR and PS have much of the same functionality. Can those who are mire familiar with them, summarize what does LR do that PS doesn't and vice versa?
Lightroom is a catalog-based digital asset manager that has Photoshop's Adobe Camera Raw conversion engine in it. It also creates slideshows, does GPS tagging, printing, web uploading and book composition and publishing.
Photoshop is a layer-based pixel editor, that has Adobe Bridge for image review (similar in some ways to Lighroom's library, but nowhere as robust), it has the identical raw processing engine optimized for working on raw images. The raw converter workflow-based operations are limited. Lightroom create presets to make repetitive raw editing operations much faster. Once the raw conversion process is finished, you are done with Lightroom or ACR, and you can export the image (or just open it if you use ACR) in Photoshop, where you can do all sorts of image manipulation that cannot be done in raw converters.
LR and CC are meant to be complementary - and while there is some commonality in the raw conversion process, most good photographers will use either to do the first steps in editing in either, but finalize the image in Photoshop. Some consider images right out of Lightroom to be good enough to be considered a final image. Personally I have yet to see an image that could not be improved upon by some additional enhancement and finishing in Photoshop or some other pixel-based editor.
For all out speed in getting images out of the camera and ready for jpg proof review, nothing beats Lightroom. When I do an event, such as a wedding or large party, I will come home with as many as 1200-1500 images often from two or more cameras (especially if I have a second shooter), yet I will have all the images culled, color corrected, tonally balanced, etc exported as jpg for proofing and uploaded to the client section of my website in about 2-3 hours. It would take me considerably more time to get the same results with Bridge/ACR/Photoshop.
In the non-Adobe world, Capture One is a Lightroom work-alike, and I could work through a large set of images just as fast with similar results. I used Capture One for several yeas before switching to Lightroom.
Photoshop has always been my go to for final editing, and for image repair and photo restorations - a couple of things that are completely impossible to do in raw converters - due to lack of layering, masking, color replacement, a wide range of brush and layer blending modes, image modes (LAB, RGB, CMYK), and being able to use color channels. There are over 500 specific commands and controls in Photoshop, making it a very flexible and precise tool, but it does come with a considerably steep learning curve.
A few years ago, Photography Life posted an often referred to article that goes into greater detail.
http://photographylife.com/photoshop-vs-lightroom