Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
DX 35mm vs FX 35mm
Page <prev 2 of 2
Apr 11, 2014 17:12:42   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
sherwinabc wrote:
First post, hope I'm doing this the right way??

I have, it seems, read many comments suggesting that only the center of an FX lens contributes to the image created when it's mounted on a DX body. Unless I'm wrong, every part of a lens contributes to every part of the image and when an FX lens is mounted on a DX body, only the center part of the image cast is captured by the DX sensor but that every part of the lens has contributed to it. There may still be less edge distortion from whatever source but it's not because part of the lens is uninvolved.
First post, hope I'm doing this the right way?? b... (show quote)

here's a good representation of sensor sizes. Imagine that you are using an FX lens but a smaller sensor. The sensor would be getting light from only a portion of the lens.



Reply
Apr 11, 2014 17:36:43   #
sherwinc Loc: SE Idaho
 
jerryc41 wrote:
here's a good representation of sensor sizes. Imagine that you are using an FX lens but a smaller sensor. The sensor would be getting light from only a portion of the lens.


OK, we're photographing a pinhead placed in the center of our image. Reflected light from the pinhead goes lots of places including the entire surface of the lens on our DX, or any other, camera. So what happens to the light from the pinhead that strikes the edge of the FX lens? Why wouldn't it be refracted right back into the image just as well as the light striking the center of the lens.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 2
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.