can a canon 40d still take a good picture or is it time to upgrade?
bobbys512 wrote:
can a canon 40d still take a good picture or is it time to upgrade?
That's a loaded question. It sounds like you want a new camera, and you're looking for approval. I hereby approve your new purchase.
Unless the 40D is damaged, it will take pictures that are just as good as when it was new. On the other hand, a new camera will have new features, and you will be more enthusiastic about taking pictures when you get it.
will I notice a big change in picture quality with a newer camera?
bobbys512 wrote:
will I notice a big change in picture quality with a newer camera?
Under the exact same conditions, I would think you would, although that would depend on the new camera. In a real world situation, I doubt that you would really notice a difference worth a thousand dollars or more.
A newer camera might be able to get better pictures in low light, focus faster, shoot faster, etc. The last thing you want to do is spend $1,000 for a new camera and see the same quality images.
thanks for your help I think I"ll keep the 40d a bit longer
bobbys512 wrote:
thanks for your help I think I"ll keep the 40d a bit longer
:thumbup:
If you have your eye on a particular new model, you can rent it for a couple of days. If you like it, look for a refurbished body. That's what I usually do.
Maybe. It depends which camera you buy. Cameras differ in the quality of the images they produce. Read reviews of cameras before buying one.
You can also rent to try before you buy a camera.
bobbys512 wrote:
will I notice a big change in picture quality with a newer camera?
bobbys512 wrote:
thanks for your help I think I"ll keep the 40d a bit longer
You don't state what lenses you have for the camera.
The Canon 40D is a solid camera with 10mp resolution. . It will be fine for any pictures you take. The camera is only a part of the photo taking process.
Many fine photos have been taken with digital cameras that don't have the capabilities of the canon 40D
I agree too on identifying your lenses and considering if that's where an upgrade might be considered if you really do have an itch ...
Although I can't speak canon, I just traded for a Nikon d100 because I wanted to complete a wet of DXX series in our collection. Since it was in such good shape I used it and discovered how impressive the quality of what it could do. Obviously it didn't do what my D700 can do, but it still could get the job done if used properly. I'm sure you can still get more out of your 40d by tweaking what you have. If you want a new camera, just get it.
bobbys512 wrote:
will I notice a big change in picture quality with a newer camera?
According to many with far greater skills than I possess the three most important factors in realizing better image quality are (in order of importance):
The 12 inches behind the lens (your brain, duh)
The lens
The camera body
That being the case using the same brain and lens MOST of your images will be no better with a new camera body.
The exceptions will be those times when your image quality is subject to the additional capabilities of your new body.
In any event, if you can afford it go ahead and buy a new body and enjoy!
Jerry
My understanding is that the 40D will out resolve it's successor, the 50D, particularly at higher ISO, but most would not notice. That being said, I have a 40D, find it's handling superior to the 20 & 30D, but can think of no reason to move on from here. After all, it only has 37,000 clicks on a 100,000 click shutter. :)
I have bought the Canon EOS 40D, 50D, 60D, I still used the 40d,I used it with the Canon 100-400mm lens. It works just fine never any issues.
I use the Canon 60D with Sigma 150-500.both have been work horses for my birding activities. I would not part with them
If I want to buy a new one it would be the Canon 7P. Not the new 70D.
It's time to upgrade to film... Get yourself an Mamiya c330
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.