Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
BEST BRIDGE CAMERA FOR TRAVEL
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Mar 12, 2014 08:07:42   #
mikegreenwald Loc: Illinois
 
Gobuster wrote:
If you are using the camera for landscapes and travel shots, you most likely don't need the super zoom capability of the SX50/60. You might be more pleased with a camera that has a larger sensor and better image quality. I highly recommend the Sony RX 100 II and RX10, their images rival those of some DSLR's and are much better than the SX50 - they do cost a bit more though!


The Sony Rx100/2 is outstanding for the purpose stated. This subject comes up frequently, and it is always recommended by many, including me.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 08:24:13   #
viscountdriver Loc: East Kent UK
 
Get the Canon SX50 and I hope you understand the instructions because I don't

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 08:36:29   #
Beagleman Loc: Indiana
 
I just bought the Olympus Stylus 1 bridge camera. It goes to 300mm and has f2.8 throughout. It is very small and easy to carry. The Sony RX10 is HUGE compared to it. If you don't need a viewfinder though there are many other smaller cameras for travel.

--Beagleman

Reply
Check out Black and White Photography section of our forum.
Mar 12, 2014 09:34:52   #
Papa Joe Loc: Midwest U.S.
 
FSATIN wrote:
I own a T3i with several lenses and am looking for a good travel bridge camera. My search has been cut down to the Canon sx50 and the LUmix fz70 & lumix fz200. Has anyone heard if new Canon sx60 is ready for sale yet? I will use the camera for mostly landscapes and other travel shots. Is the 2.8 on the fz200 with shorter zoom better than the canon's longer zoom of 1200mm? I could use some guidance from the experts?


I'm not familiar with the Lumix, but I enjoy my SX-50 tremendously. I've done some very good low-light work too with it. Love the zoom feature and the ability to shoot in Raw, Jpg or both simultaneously.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 09:40:34   #
Basil Loc: New Mexico
 
cjkorb wrote:
The Canon has a much longer zoom, 50X vs. 24X, better video and a more rapid burst and better picture quality. The Canon is a better bridge camera.


I'll second that. I recently bought t he SX50 after a lot of research and soul searching. For me it came down to the SX50 or the Panasonic FZ200. Both Cameras have their pros and cons, but for me, it come down to the super-zoom of the SX50 and the IS that had rave reviews. I'm sure the FZ200 is also a great camera, but I'm very satisfied with the SX50. I would recommended to anyone looking for a great bridge camera.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 10:26:32   #
Shellback Loc: North of Cheyenne Bottoms Wetlands - Kansas
 
CANON SX50 RECALL -
Be advised -
14,000 Canon PowerShot SX50 cameras recalled
The rubber around the viewfinder of this advanced point-and-shoot may cause skin or eye irritation

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2014/03/14-000-canon-powershot-sx50-cameras-recalled/index.htm

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 10:30:49   #
dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho
 
I recently bought the Lumix FZ200 for my wife and we both love it. It is lightweight and the zoom works well. No it doesn't go out to 1200mm like the Canon SX50 but it goes to 600mm with good resolution. It also has the f2.8 Leica lens which helps with low light photography. It is a keeper for us.

Dennis

Reply
Check out Landscape Photography section of our forum.
Mar 12, 2014 10:31:54   #
MtnMan Loc: ID
 
FSATIN wrote:
I own a T3i with several lenses and am looking for a good travel bridge camera. My search has been cut down to the Canon sx50 and the LUmix fz70 & lumix fz200. Has anyone heard if new Canon sx60 is ready for sale yet? I will use the camera for mostly landscapes and other travel shots. Is the 2.8 on the fz200 with shorter zoom better than the canon's longer zoom of 1200mm? I could use some guidance from the experts?


I just bought the Sony NEX 7 for travel and hiking. It weighs nothing compared to my D 800 but has a 24 MP DX.sensor. The panorama feature is fabulous. It has worked out grat for hiking.

My main contender was the Panasonic GX 7 which has a 4/3 sensor.

Alas my first air travel since buying it is next week but involves really fabulous opportunities for birds so I'm back to hauling the D 800 and Sigma 150-500 which together are an order of magnitude larger and heavier than the delightful Sony. It involves a boat so at least I don't have to lug it.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 10:33:35   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
Beercat wrote:
I have 9 cameras .........

One of them is a new Sony RX10. The new Sony bridge camera does very well against most of the 1.6X DSLR cameras and is way smaller.

Unless you want to carry around a full frame DSLR the new Sony RX10 is a great choice, a bridge camera with all the features found on most DSLR's except being able to change the lens but when you have a 25mm - 200mm that will hold 2.8 you really don't need to change much.


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 10:48:38   #
RJNaylor Loc: Delmar, New York
 
To add to all other thoughts -- in May Canon is releasing for sale an updated G1X Mark 2 with a 1.5" sensor but a much faster lens ... While I chose the RX100M over the Olympus 4/3 for a light camera, the new Canon might have been the choice if it had been available.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 10:50:36   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
Some of the cameras mentioned are not really "bridge cameras" :wink:

The Sony RX10 though larger than most is still considered a bridge camera.

What the RX10 has on all the other "bridge cameras" is the size of the sensor, the largest of all.

Another plus is the superb video so you now have a great 20MP still camera along with a very good video camera, all in one package. Some say the RX10 is heavy .......... it's the glass! Good glass usually has some weight to it and isn't cheap.

There are several other good bridge cameras, the question is which one fits your needs the best. As I take professional video I choose the RX10 because it was a great compromise to give me good quality video from a 1" composite sensor plus the need to take good stills to incorporate within my video edits, all in true bridge camera size :)

A few complaints I have with the RX10 is the LCD screen which has directional limitations. I also wish the shutter speed dial was a bit larger, plus I prefer touch screen menus but it does so much well I overlook some of the limitations.

When I shoot nothing but stills for money I still pull out my high end Canon but for a second body or travel camera I leave the Canon at home along with all the heavy extra equipment and now take the RX10.

Reply
 
 
Mar 12, 2014 11:24:24   #
NeilL Loc: British-born Canadian
 
Beercat wrote:
Some of the cameras mentioned are not really "bridge cameras" :wink:

The Sony RX10 though larger than most is still considered a bridge camera.

What the RX10 has on all the other "bridge cameras" is the size of the sensor, the largest of all.

Another plus is the superb video so you now have a great 20MP still along with a very good video, all in one package. Some say the RX10 is heavy .......... it's the glass! Good glass usually has some weight to it.

There are several other good bridge cameras, the secret is which one fits your needs. As I take professional video I choose the RX10 because it was a great compromise to give me good quality video from a 1" composite sensor plus the need to take good stills to incorporate within my video edits, all in true bridge camera size :)

A few complaints I have with the RX10 is the LCD screen which has limitations on being directional. I also wish the shutter sped dial was a bit larger, plus I prefer touch screen menus but it does so much well I overlook some of the limitations.

When I shoot nothing but stills for money I still pull out my high end Canon but for a second body or travel camera I leave the Canon at home along with all the heavy extra equipment and now take the RX10.
Some of the cameras mentioned are not really "... (show quote)


Very well put, Beercat! I would like to add that the lens is Zeiss glass - a legend. To buy DSLR lenses of this quality and constant 2.8 aperture to cover the full 200mm range of this Zeiss would probably cost in excess of $2,000. THEN you have buy the body, too. If you can afford the RX10 price-tag, $1,299.00 it's a bargain.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 11:37:15   #
rudyp16 Loc: Toms River, NJ
 
THe FZ200 is awesome. I own it and lent it to my daughter for her cruise. Don't leave home without it.

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 11:38:50   #
N Tom Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
I own a Panasonic FZ200 which I truly love for its versatility-- including its VIDEO capabilities and EXT. MIKE JACK which is why I got it instead of some other bridge cameras. HOWEVER if I were looking for HIGHER RES STILLS including landscape images and something light weight, I believe that I'd go for the Sony RX100-II with extremely high resolution for stills. Following is a list of some of its various features: (They are sold in a few places for around $550).

. . . the tiltable 3.0” 1,229K-dot display assisted in framing and shooting in difficult situations. The unit preformed well in low light for both stills and movies and has a fast 0.13-second Auto Focus response. We found the unique Setting Control Ring around the lens to be a great feature. Adjustments were smooth and seamless with clear feedback on the display. Another impressive feature is the programmable Function button. Your favorite functions are only a button press away and you can assign up to 7 functions from 17 possibilities. The RX100 II has numerous image enhancing and creative features as well as a sound functioning Image Stabilization system. It’s big camera performance in a small package.

Description
When beautiful scenery inspires the artist within, capture every exquisite detail with the compact Cyber-shot RX100 II. You’ll enjoy extraordinary light sensitivity, breathtaking image quality and beautiful background defocusing thanks to a newly developed 1.0-inch back-illuminated CMOS sensor. . .

Reply
Mar 12, 2014 11:49:18   #
Beercat Loc: Central Coast of California
 
Another good choice, same sensor as the RX10 and the small package

N Tom wrote:
I own a Panasonic FZ200 which I truly love for its versatility-- including its VIDEO capabilities and EXT. MIKE JACK which is why I got it instead of some other bridge cameras. HOWEVER if I were looking for HIGHER RES STILLS including landscape images and something light weight, I believe that I'd go for the Sony RX100-II with extremely high resolution for stills. Following is a list of some of its various features: (They are sold in a few places for around $550).

. . . the tiltable 3.0” 1,229K-dot display assisted in framing and shooting in difficult situations. The unit preformed well in low light for both stills and movies and has a fast 0.13-second Auto Focus response. We found the unique Setting Control Ring around the lens to be a great feature. Adjustments were smooth and seamless with clear feedback on the display. Another impressive feature is the programmable Function button. Your favorite functions are only a button press away and you can assign up to 7 functions from 17 possibilities. The RX100 II has numerous image enhancing and creative features as well as a sound functioning Image Stabilization system. It’s big camera performance in a small package.

Description
When beautiful scenery inspires the artist within, capture every exquisite detail with the compact Cyber-shot RX100 II. You’ll enjoy extraordinary light sensitivity, breathtaking image quality and beautiful background defocusing thanks to a newly developed 1.0-inch back-illuminated CMOS sensor. . .
I own a Panasonic FZ200 which I truly love for its... (show quote)


:)

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.