Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
True Macro-Photography Forum
Documenting your macro fields at different magnifications
Jan 25, 2012 22:59:12   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
When I obtained my Nikkor 105D macro lens, I wanted to document the actual Field of View (FOV) at Minimum Working Distance (MWD).

My D90 sensor size is 23.6-mm x 15.8-mm.

I manually set 105D lens to maximum extension (closest focus), then physically moved camera in-&-out until target was in critical focus. I photographed a metallic metric scale (image #1). Notice captured field is approximately 23.5-mm wide. This is extremely close to 1:1 (life-size) capture.

Next, I added 68-mm of extension tubes (12 + 20 +36), and repeated procedure (image #2). Captured field is now about 12-mm wide. This is 4:1 (4x life-size) = twice as wide x twice as high.

105-mm MWD field of view
105-mm MWD field of view...

105-mm MWD field with 68-mm tubes
105-mm MWD field with 68-mm tubes...

Reply
Jan 26, 2012 18:09:06   #
Pixelpixie88 Loc: Northern Minnesota
 
It's nice that you put information like this out here Nikonian. It all seems so "greek" to me. Numbers and I just don't get along. However, reading your post helps to make things look more understandable. Do you rely on the extension tubes very often for macro? Like I said before, I have the Tamron 60mm and once spring arrives (with bugs and flowers) I'll be out there practicing.

Reply
Jan 26, 2012 19:48:28   #
Nikonian72 Loc: Chico CA
 
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
It's nice that you put information like this out here Nikonian. It all seems so "greek" to me. Numbers and I just don't get along. However, reading your post helps to make things look more understandable. Do you rely on the extension tubes very often for macro? Like I said before, I have the Tamron 60mm and once spring arrives (with bugs and flowers) I'll be out there practicing.
I am pleased that you find my pontifications useful!

As a field macro-photographer, I rarely use extension tubes because of extremely shallow DOF. I have a hard enough time capturing bugs at f/22 when less than life-size.

Someday, I hope to acquire a motorized sequential stage to use for tabletop static (aka DEAD) insect photography, for focus stacked images.

Reply
 
 
Jan 27, 2012 16:41:36   #
dirtpusher Loc: tulsa oklahoma
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
Pixelpixie88 wrote:
It's nice that you put information like this out here Nikonian. It all seems so "greek" to me. Numbers and I just don't get along. However, reading your post helps to make things look more understandable. Do you rely on the extension tubes very often for macro? Like I said before, I have the Tamron 60mm and once spring arrives (with bugs and flowers) I'll be out there practicing.
I am pleased that you find my pontification & babblings useful!
As a field macro-photographer, I rarely use extension tubes because of extremely shallow DOF. I have a hard enough time capturing bugs at f/22 when less than life-size.
Someday, I hope to acquire a motorized sequential stage to use for tabletop static (aka DEAD) insect photography, for focus stacked images.
quote=Pixelpixie88 It's nice that you put informa... (show quote)
motorized sequential stage = wow think i would love see if i could make some these on my milling table an lathe out of plastic after i blow the dust off it. http://www.produstrial.com/Stages-s/7186.htm?gclid=CL6bxdCT8a0CFWyHtgodPzX3tA

all i can say is keep babbling

Reply
Jan 28, 2012 10:56:52   #
rayford2 Loc: New Bethlehem, PA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
When I obtained my Nikkor 105D macro lens, I wanted to document the actual Field of View (FOV) at Minimum Working Distance (MWD).
My D90 sensor size is 23.6-mm x 15.8-mm.
I manually set 105D lens to maximum extension (closest focus), then physically moved camera in-&-out until target was in critical focus. I photographed a metallic metric scale (image #1). Notice captured field is approximately 23.5-mm wide. This is extremely close to 1:1 (life-size) capture.
Next, I added 68-mm of extension tubes (12 + 20 +36), and repeated procedure (image #2). Captured field is now about 12-mm wide. This is 4:1 (4x life-size) = twice as wide x twice as high.
When I obtained my Nikkor 105D macro lens, I wante... (show quote)
That was a great piece of information. Thank you.

Reply
Jan 29, 2012 13:50:33   #
Pepper Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
 
Nikonian72 wrote:
When I obtained my Nikkor 105D macro lens, I wanted to document the actual Field of View (FOV) at Minimum Working Distance (MWD).
My D90 sensor size is 23.6-mm x 15.8-mm.
I manually set 105D lens to maximum extension (closest focus), then physically moved camera in-&-out until target was in critical focus. I photographed a metallic metric scale (image #1). Notice captured field is approximately 23.5-mm wide. This is extremely close to 1:1 (life-size) capture.
Next, I added 68-mm of extension tubes (12 + 20 +36), and repeated procedure (image #2). Captured field is now about 12-mm wide. This is 4:1 (4x life-size) = twice as wide x twice as high.
When I obtained my Nikkor 105D macro lens, I wante... (show quote)
What a great post! Thank you

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Travel Photography - Tips and More section of our forum.
True Macro-Photography Forum
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.