Hoppy wrote:
preciousmetalairracing wrote:
I would like your thots.. even if not good. thx
Anytime you are near enough to aircraft to photograph them, do so and take many, many, many shots. Out of 1000's of photos there will usually be a real keeper. The smell of 100LL and 50 weight oil smoke keep me flying beyond my 74 years.
Keep shooting and keep posting, consider the constructive criticism, and then learn from the constructive advice.
Blue skies, Hoppy
Well done love the picture,And well said.
When I was about 9 years old I was given a tour of GAFB in ny. I loved planes and my parents knew folks at th base. While on tour the capt. decided to put me in the seat of a Black Panther. Idid something that made him go ballistic. I put my hand on the ejection handle. I knew what it was so I had no intention of pulling it. ps the plane was in the hanger.
mwh2385
Loc: Fairfield Glade, Tennessee
Here's Mine!
Tight Formation - Blue Angels
My first commercial flight: Midway-Wold took two hours and we were served lunch with the front office door open.
dfalk
Loc: Chugiak, Alaska
dragonfist wrote:
Actually if you look on the back of the fuselage it says Navy. Therefore it is an SNJ. The Army Air Force used the same aircraft but it was called the AT-6 Texan. The Canadians called it the Harvard. I'm an airplane buff.
I didn't want to confuse folks with the SNJ designation. It's the same basic airplane. I think the castoring tailwheel and tailhook (on some of them) is the only difference between the two.
I've flown a T-6G that was painted and marked as an SNJ.
preciousmetalairracing wrote:
I would like your thots.. even if not good. thx
Beautiful! Especially the first one.
mwh2385 wrote:
Here's Mine!
WOW!!! They sure ARE flying close! Beautiful picture!
The pictures are great, but what's important to me is how you got them, what camera, lens, aperture, shutter, ISO, filter etc and where/ what they were taken from. Smilin' Geo.
dfalk wrote:
dragonfist wrote:
Actually if you look on the back of the fuselage it says Navy. Therefore it is an SNJ. The Army Air Force used the same aircraft but it was called the AT-6 Texan. The Canadians called it the Harvard. I'm an airplane buff.
I didn't want to confuse folks with the SNJ designation. It's the same basic airplane. I think the castoring tailwheel and tailhook (on some of them) is the only difference between the two.
I've flown a T-6G that was painted and marked as an SNJ.
quote=dragonfist br br Actually if you look on ... (
show quote)
It is true that they are basically the same plane, except for some modified naval models but I am just a stickler for accuracy. It is the same with the North American T-28. Air Force model had a two blade prop and smaller engine than the Navy version. Navy model swung a three blade prop, had a larger engine and beefed up airframe for carrier landings and of course a tail hook. They look a lot alike in the air but are two different airplanes.
planepics
Loc: St. Louis burbs, but originally Chicago burbs
here are a few of my favorites
Here are a couple of rare old German birds. There aren't many of them left.
Messerschitt Me-108 Taifun Trainer
Fiesler Storch Observation Plane
Excellent, one & all. Thanks every one of you for this grand diversion. I loved looking at the photos, & reading the verbage.
You are right.---also some T6's had a prop spinner.
This pic might be a -3 or 4 model by the looks of the very back of the canopy.
also the T6 had a square tail wheel tire and the J was round.
We had about 200 of them where I was stationed in Pensacola.
We taught A-B-and C stage so none of ours had a tail hook.
Chuck
i think they are some nice shots,keep shooting
dfalk wrote:
chewy wrote:
Is that a T33 in second pic.? Other wise known as a Texas trainer.
It is a T-6 Texan.
And that P-40 is a P-47.
Did the Navy fly T-6s or could it be an SNJ?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.