Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Film Photography
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
Jan 29, 2014 02:03:33   #
Darkroom317 Loc: Mishawaka, IN
 
doogie wrote:
The answer would be yes for me. Although the variance of coffee and chemicals depends on the day of the week and which book I'm currently reading or what I'm doing homework wise. speaking of which I highly recommend Within the Frame by David duChemin. Wonderful book for the visualization process. While his equipment is different than what I use the concepts are still wonderfully the same. :) And while I do prefer film I absolutely enjoy the alternative processes. The Wet plate processes are absolutely fascinating and a great way to slow down the world so to speak and just enjoy time as it relates to the photographic process.

I've been working in primarily 120/ and 4x5 b/w film. While I tend to favor Ilford HP5 in both 120 and 4x5, I also find a certain taste for Adox CHS 100 II and CMS II 20 respectively. I stick to Ilford for the most part as the chemicals used to process it are the same as are available at the local film store and the ratios are constant. Whereas the chemicals for the Adox films are a different beast all together and I normally have to order out by post to get those as the local store does not carry them to my dismay.

Right now I'm doing a copper substrate transfer series paired with some Sabattier, Vandyke, & Chemigram work. Absolutely fascinating stuff. Although of the three processes I prefer the Sabattier/ Chemigram combination by far. The copper substrate transfers take on average of 36 hours to do and are fairly labor intensive. But the result is absolutely pristine if you utilize a 100% copper substrate. Tons of fun.

Currently setting up a summer project to produce a ferrotype (or melainotype/ Tintype) series as a homage to Minor White's work. Still studying the impact of UV light as it relates to melainotypes and the chemical aspects of the process. Quite interesting if you ask me. I'm kind of itching to try my hand at contact printing directly from negatives to tin. It's going to be wonderful fun. :) And a lot easier than producing digital negatives - well not perhaps easier, but it certainly does cut out the computer which will always be fine by me. LOL

And to the OP. Best of luck in your film endeavors! If you are returning to the world of film... Welcome and may your stay be long and produce many a photographic adventure. :) :)

V/r,
Doogie
The answer would be yes for me. Although the varia... (show quote)


By copper substrate transfer do you mean photogravure. I am about to start working with it

Reply
Jan 29, 2014 02:26:30   #
doogie Loc: Washington
 
Darkroom317 wrote:
By copper substrate transfer do you mean photogravure. I am about to start working with it


Would I only wish that it were! :) Unfortunately I don't currently have the space in my flat to do photogravure. :( Something about asphaltum and cats in a small flat do not mix well together and tends to make the landlord fairly unhappy. LOL

With regard to the copper substrate transfer ( wash process is similar to that of photogravure prep but ends just short of the asphaltum application)

I start out with a Silver gelatin print (toned or not doesn't matter, however, hand printed images work best), then make a laser copy of said print and then use a gel medium to affix the image to the substrate and then heat the metal hot to the touch. I then let dry for 24 hours and then finish the process which takes an additional 10 hours. Pain in the neck really, but being able to move the silver gelatin print from the finishing room into another process is worth it.

V/r,
Doogie

Reply
Jan 29, 2014 02:35:04   #
BHC Loc: Strawberry Valley, JF, USA
 
doogie wrote:
Would I only wish that it were! :) Unfortunately I don't currently have the space in my flat to do photogravure. :( Something about asphaltum and cats in a small flat do not mix well together and tends to make the landlord fairly unhappy. LOL

With regard to the copper substrate transfer ( wash process is similar to that of photogravure prep but ends just short of the asphaltum application)

I start out with a Silver gelatin print (toned or not doesn't matter, however, hand printed images work best), then make a laser copy of said print and then use a gel medium to affix the image to the substrate and then heat the metal hot to the touch. I then let dry for 24 hours and then finish the process which takes an additional 10 hours. Pain in the neck really, but being able to move the silver gelatin print from the finishing room into another process is worth it.

V/r,
Doogie
Would I only wish that it were! :) Unfortunately... (show quote)

Doc, if you ever get a high pressure press for some of your contact transfers, you have a choice: either give the cats to your sister or practice on them with the press. It's sorta messy to clean up, but it certainly tests the ability to apply (if you don't mind the analogy) bone-crushing force. Bill

Reply
 
 
Jan 29, 2014 08:13:23   #
Darkroom317 Loc: Mishawaka, IN
 
doogie wrote:
Would I only wish that it were! :) Unfortunately I don't currently have the space in my flat to do photogravure. :( Something about asphaltum and cats in a small flat do not mix well together and tends to make the landlord fairly unhappy. LOL

With regard to the copper substrate transfer ( wash process is similar to that of photogravure prep but ends just short of the asphaltum application)

I start out with a Silver gelatin print (toned or not doesn't matter, however, hand printed images work best), then make a laser copy of said print and then use a gel medium to affix the image to the substrate and then heat the metal hot to the touch. I then let dry for 24 hours and then finish the process which takes an additional 10 hours. Pain in the neck really, but being able to move the silver gelatin print from the finishing room into another process is worth it.

V/r,
Doogie
Would I only wish that it were! :) Unfortunately... (show quote)


Try the polymer photogravure process. No asphaltum or rosin required.

Reply
Jan 29, 2014 15:45:14   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
i use 35, 120, 5x4 and 7x5 with a wet darkroom
i never use digital devices.

Reply
Jan 29, 2014 22:58:27   #
PVR8 Loc: Raleigh, NC
 
A few months back I was in my local camera shop and I found out that Kodak is producing Ektar 35mm film again. I used to shoot Ektar and Fuji Reala but I prefered Ektar. I bought a roll of Ektar and shot a vintage car meet with my Nikon N6006. I had the film developed at Walgreens and they put the pictures on cd. I then uploaded the pictures to Snapfish for processing. When I got them back they were fantastic. I rarely shoot film because digital is so much more convenient and economical compared to film, but I intend to shoot more film because I really like the saturation and smoothness of pictures shot with film. I'm glad that Kodak is producing Ektar again but not in the 25 speed they used to produce. 100 is the slowest Ektar available now. The old 25 speed Ektar produced mind blowing prints and the new 100 is very very close.

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 00:53:16   #
hannaco Loc: People's Republic of California
 
That is indeed good news. I have just one roll of the Ektar 25 left in the freezer.

Reply
 
 
Jan 30, 2014 21:52:59   #
ArgusSnap1 Loc: Indiana
 
jmccl wrote:
I also am a sometimes filmie. Strongly recommend www.thedarkroom.com for processing. Very high quality and very cost effective.

Here's an example of recent MF 6X9 on TMax 100 with the least expensive scan. Anybody else in the group capturing with a 1937 Lumiere?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/49889935@N07/sets/72157635777168844/




Hi--I like www.thedarkroom.com as well. When I move and get settled in my new condo--I can dev my own b/w and send color to the Darkroom.com and 35mm color toSam's Club.Thanks

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 21:55:22   #
ArgusSnap1 Loc: Indiana
 
jmccl wrote:
I also am a sometimes filmie. Strongly recommend www.thedarkroom.com for processing. Very high quality and very cost effective.

Here's an example of recent MF 6X9 on TMax 100 with the least expensive scan. Anybody else in the group capturing with a 1937 Lumiere?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/49889935@N07/sets/72157635777168844/


Very nice shots--did you use that old camera pictured next to your images on your flickr site to take those? Outstanding images--thanks for the link.

Reply
Jan 30, 2014 22:04:50   #
ArgusSnap1 Loc: Indiana
 
I still do film--I've been stocking up as well and sometimes friends give me old fil--mostly color--I use it in my Dianas and Holgas any any way I feel like. Currently I use a Rolieflex(hand-me-down),2x Yashicha MatGs and I have a Minolta Autocord I hope to use in warmer wheather--all of which are TLRs. A friend gave me a Mamiya M645--I have taken a couple of shots but have not seen the results. I have a4x5 Speed Graphic that I have gotten good results with. I have a new to me 2x3 Baby Speed Graphic--have not tried it yet. My main 35mm was Minolta SRT series, but have added nikon film,canon, pentax and lots of oldies but goodies cameras.lots of fun!

Reply
Jan 31, 2014 09:14:04   #
jmccl Loc: Western Shore of Utah Lake
 
ArgusSnap1 wrote:
Very nice shots--did you use that old camera pictured next to your images on your flickr site to take those? Outstanding images--thanks for the link.


Thanks. Yes that is the camera that produced the images. I thought they were remarkable for a 77 year old camera that just came out of the drawer and had no CLA. I gather that you are an Argus afficionado. Here's another link:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/49889935@N07/sets/72157635739086095/

Reply
 
 
Feb 2, 2014 19:23:07   #
ArgusSnap1 Loc: Indiana
 
jmccl wrote:
Thanks. Yes that is the camera that produced the images. I thought they were remarkable for a 77 year old camera that just came out of the drawer and had no CLA. I gather that you are an Argus afficionado. Here's another link:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/49889935@N07/sets/72157635739086095/



Hi-yes I started with an Argus Markfinder--my father gave it too me in 1968 whenhe bought a Topcon Auto 100. It still works--I should take it for a shoot later onthis spring. I just bought a C3 off of ebay and waiting for it to arrive. It's amazing how well these ol' cameras did! But they did have straight lenses rather than zooms which are almost always sharper. My Father shot many fine Kodachromes with this so we have a family history of 3 kids growing up from 1947 until the late 60's. Thanks

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 14:08:15   #
Emp Loc: new york state nassau county
 
I am still shooting film. I have digital cameras but I was brought up on film in the 1970s so it is hard for me to switch totally. I take my negatives to a local shop and he doses a great job. I want to get the t-shirt that says,"I Still Shoot Film" Enjoy both!!!!!!!!!!
Regards all,
Emp.

Reply
Feb 3, 2014 15:09:24   #
wj cody Loc: springfield illinois
 
ArgusSnap1 wrote:
Hi-yes I started with an Argus Markfinder--my father gave it too me in 1968 whenhe bought a Topcon Auto 100. It still works--I should take it for a shoot later onthis spring. I just bought a C3 off of ebay and waiting for it to arrive. It's amazing how well these ol' cameras did! But they did have straight lenses rather than zooms which are almost always sharper. My Father shot many fine Kodachromes with this so we have a family history of 3 kids growing up from 1947 until the late 60's. Thanks


Erica, my late wife, and i always thought we'd buy about 200,000 argus c3s and build a house out of them. lucky for you folks we never did!!
probably the most ubiquitous cameras until the advent of the Canon AE1 and AE1 Programs.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 5
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.