DaveO wrote:
I found it interesting enough that I'm going to pick scenes and experiment with different lenses until I get the perspective I'm looking for. Got to get ready for a May trip! My wife and I share a 35,50,18-55,18-105,12-24 and a 55-300. I am contemplating an 85 for a faster lens at more distance and dimmer light. I guess shooting at 85 with the 55-300 would be somewhat of an indicator, but I am guessing. (f1.8 vs 4.5-5.6) My real reason in the long run is for portraits. Thoughts?? Trying to go along with the thread.
I found it interesting enough that I'm going to pi... (
show quote)
DaveO wrote:
We have a d3100 and a d7000. I was leaning towards the 85 mostly due to indoor shots of birthdays, etc. We're planning another trip to Yellowstone in May and our previous equip was just the d3100,18-55 and 55-300, and a tripod. Most of our shot were with the 18-55 and I thought the 85 would be a good edition, but I will concede I thought of the 135 and dismissed it because the majority of the use will be inside. Could be my last big trip.
Portraits, indoors, dimmer light, I can't help feeling you're heading down the wrong road here thinking of the 85mm. There's nothing wrong with an 85mm fast lens for indoor Portraiture on a FF camera but on your two crop bodies it will have the FOV of a 127mm lens and unless it's a really big room or you just want head shots, it may be a bit limiting.
My favourite lens for low light indoor Portraits on a crop camera is the Minolta 58/1.2 (87mm FOV equiv) but the Nikkor 58/1.4 is a little pricey. Your 50mm is probably quite a fast lens and with a 75mm FOV on your crop body, I'd be very tempted to stick with that. If you're prepared to use flash, you could use your 18-105mm for a bit more flexibility.