Gay marriage and gun control
Jan 8, 2014 17:07:42 #
dirtpusher wrote:
could you go into more detail on this (forced) part your statement.
He's being sarcastic, you're just too stupid to catch it.
Jan 8, 2014 17:10:04 #
Art Grandpa wrote:
Should I post your response? The image was not really safe for this forum but if you want to air dirty laundry that picture really should be posted.
Glad you had to Google "hilarious." It's a tough word, I lost the 2nd grade spelling bee to that one.
Glad you had to Google "hilarious." It's a tough word, I lost the 2nd grade spelling bee to that one.
now that is a blatant lie. cause you did not get a response back. i just copied it a posted it immediately then tooh a screen capture. but please do show us a screen capture of my response. that wasn't one sorry.
it has to be a screen capture... to validate it....
Jan 8, 2014 17:10:28 #
dirtpusher wrote:
now that is a blatant lie. cause you did not get a response back. i just copied it a posted it immediately then tooh a screen capture. but please do show us a screen capture of my response. that wasn't one sorry.
it has to be a screen capture... to validate it....
it has to be a screen capture... to validate it....
I'm not going to post your pornographic pictures in public.
Jan 8, 2014 17:11:26 #
Jan 8, 2014 17:11:42 #
Art Grandpa wrote:
I'm not going to post your pornographic pictures in public.
Hung to the left, didnt it?
Jan 8, 2014 17:13:41 #
Art Grandpa wrote:
He's being sarcastic, you're just too stupid to catch it.
think you have problem understand anything. an now you have a limited vocabulary an resulting to the use of name calling.. you are starting to appear to be leading your self.
Jan 8, 2014 17:14:40 #
Art Grandpa wrote:
I'm not going to post your pornographic pictures in public.
dream on.. lol
tell us another lie..roflmao :roll: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Jan 8, 2014 17:17:44 #
dirtpusher wrote:
think you have problem understand anything. an now you have a limited vocabulary an resulting to the use of name calling.. you are starting to appear to be leading your self.
No, he was right, that was sarcasm, and you're seriously stupid if you actually thought I was forced to "gay adopt" anybody.
Jan 8, 2014 17:19:03 #
AuntPhil wrote:
Marriage for a long time was about property rights, not protection of children. And either way gay couples can adopt children and there are quite a few cases of gay couples having children naturally (with both spouses as biological parents.)
I'm really confused. "with both spouses as biological parents." Wouldn't both females have eggs and no sperm, and both males have sperm and no egg? How do "quite a few cases of gay couples having children naturally". Yes go to a sperm bank, or have a surrogate‎, but that is not from their marriage. Isn't that called artificial insemination. Mother Nature dictates the inability of gays having children directly with each other.
Where in the anus is the uterus or egg placement, for the male on male connection, and/or in the spit is sperm for the females on female uniting to become pregnant?
Jan 8, 2014 17:20:31 #
an i have ever noticed if it is possible to send a photo in a private message. have to go check'... :shock:
dang just checked there isn't any way i can see to send a picture.. more proof you maybe habital lier, when you get backed into a corner'...
try again with another lie. :thumbdown:
dang just checked there isn't any way i can see to send a picture.. more proof you maybe habital lier, when you get backed into a corner'...
try again with another lie. :thumbdown:
Jan 8, 2014 17:21:59 #
rhitmrb wrote:
No, he was right, that was sarcasm, and you're seriously stupid if you actually thought I was forced to "gay adopt" anybody.
you maybe capable of believing that. don't know! :!:
Jan 8, 2014 17:22:08 #
Ka2azman wrote:
I'm really confused. "with both spouses as bi... (show quote)
When did sex have to always be for baby making? Have none of you just had sex for fun, on a tuesday at 2:17 PM?
Jan 8, 2014 17:22:31 #
Ka2azman wrote:
I'm really confused. "with both spouses as bi... (show quote)
Are you advocating the marriages of couples who use in vitro fertilization be revoked?
Jan 8, 2014 17:27:39 #
rhitmrb wrote:
How has your life been forced to change by gays? Please enumerate the actual impact on your life.
The actual impact on my life is their wanting money out of my pocket to service their life style. Presently Arizona has an amendment, but it is being challenged and therefore it costs me (my taxes) to fight this. Not only that but in states that have allowed it any business there now must pick up cost for things like SSN and health care etc, thus causing rise in cost of products because someone has to pay and its not the company that will pay for the added cost. It will be passed down to the consumer, aka ME!
Jan 8, 2014 17:28:47 #
rhitmrb wrote:
That sounds more like your life is being affected by the refusal of Catholic adoption agencies to comply with the law.
Gay marriage in Arizona is against the law. And most others. It is a few that have lost their marbles.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.