Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
My People aren't Popping
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
Jan 2, 2014 17:05:17   #
Dcn Bob Loc: Hamilton, NJ
 
Here is my attempt using Picasa



Reply
Jan 2, 2014 20:14:12   #
Bram boy Loc: Vancouver Island B.C. Canada
 
Dcn Bob wrote:
Here is my attempt using Picasa


yea that's great looks like it was snapped with one of those pollards

Reply
Jan 2, 2014 20:52:20   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
ricardolegraham wrote:
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of frustration for a while. It's not of much importance to me, but it's an interesting PP challenge.
I took this after a friend had shot a few pictures and I didn't realize he had set my camera to shutter priority at 1/3200, so I ended up exposing at ISO 2000, getting a lot of noise, and faded colors. (he also set the picture style to my Technicolor Cinestyle preset, which I reserve for tweaking on video shoots, so colors are faded at all ISOs.) I recently tried fixing it up in GIMP (That's all my budget can take, no Lightroom here), and I just can't quite make them pop. Any suggestions? or did the high shutter speed/ISO (and Cinestyle - in case you're wondering, never use Cinestyle for stills) just mess it up too much?

Canon 60D, EF-S18-55 3.5-5.6 IS II 1/3200 f/5 ISO 2000
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of ... (show quote)


The girls are slightly out of focus so a little sharpening helped some.

Boost contrast, sharpen selectively, boost color saturation slightly
Boost contrast, sharpen selectively, boost color s...

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2014 23:08:29   #
nivek340 Loc: South Hadley Ma.
 
Now see this



Reply
Jan 3, 2014 03:27:19   #
gwigley
 
ricardolegraham wrote:
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of frustration for a while. It's not of much importance to me, but it's an interesting PP challenge.
I took this after a friend had shot a few pictures and I didn't realize he had set my camera to shutter priority at 1/3200, so I ended up exposing at ISO 2000, getting a lot of noise, and faded colors. (he also set the picture style to my Technicolor Cinestyle preset, which I reserve for tweaking on video shoots, so colors are faded at all ISOs.) I recently tried fixing it up in GIMP (That's all my budget can take, no Lightroom here), and I just can't quite make them pop. Any suggestions? or did the high shutter speed/ISO (and Cinestyle - in case you're wondering, never use Cinestyle for stills) just mess it up too much?

Canon 60D, EF-S18-55 3.5-5.6 IS II 1/3200 f/5 ISO 2000
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of ... (show quote)


I tried to make it pop some more, hope you enjoy it

Download it to see it better

People aren't popping
People aren't popping...

Reply
Jan 3, 2014 17:45:20   #
TucsonCoyote Loc: Tucson AZ
 
You'll get more help than you need when "your people" are good looking....ain't that so ricardolegraham!?? :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 3, 2014 20:37:58   #
asjohnston3 Loc: Irving, TX
 
Couldn't resist.... I also use Gimp 2. Auto - Color enhance - Tone Curve to balance the histogram & then added contrast - finished with Filters-Enhance-Unsharpen mask to bring up the detail....



Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2014 00:31:03   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
gwigley wrote:
I tried to make it pop some more, hope you enjoy it

Download it to see it better


It's green. Better calibrate your monitor!

Reply
Jan 4, 2014 04:18:00   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
Not really sure what you are after but this one has deeper shadows than most of the others and less of an airbrush look on the skin.
CS5 & Nik Viveza



Reply
Jan 4, 2014 16:20:08   #
ronwande Loc: Hendersonville NC
 
Been watching this one for a few days. Lots of tries, all of them improvements, but on my calibrated monitor most (not all) of them look like the girls have blue skin!

Might there be something wrong with my monitor calibration procedure?

Reply
Jan 4, 2014 17:55:33   #
icke
 
Hello ronwande...same here (watching)...probably not (your monitor)... the majority of the posted pics created the asked for "pop" by accentuating/improving color, shadows and or sharpness. This in turn also accentuated some of the flaws of the pic (opinion) ... blemishes, wrinkles, shadows and the probable cause of what caught your eye, tonal value. I personally enjoy this section but wish more people would explain their work flow and others would respond with constructive suggestions...I notice that the original poster has not responded as to what he thinks about the majority of attempted touch ups...to find the facial tonal values in photoshop click ...windows >>>>> info (F8) :{)

Reply
 
 
Jan 4, 2014 18:04:02   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
ricardolegraham wrote:
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of frustration for a while. It's not of much importance to me, but it's an interesting PP challenge.
I took this after a friend had shot a few pictures and I didn't realize he had set my camera to shutter priority at 1/3200, so I ended up exposing at ISO 2000, getting a lot of noise, and faded colors. (he also set the picture style to my Technicolor Cinestyle preset, which I reserve for tweaking on video shoots, so colors are faded at all ISOs.) I recently tried fixing it up in GIMP (That's all my budget can take, no Lightroom here), and I just can't quite make them pop. Any suggestions? or did the high shutter speed/ISO (and Cinestyle - in case you're wondering, never use Cinestyle for stills) just mess it up too much?

Canon 60D, EF-S18-55 3.5-5.6 IS II 1/3200 f/5 ISO 2000
So this is a photo that's been giving me a bit of ... (show quote)


Hope you don't mind but I think that it can be fixed, a couple of minutes in photoshop and I got this, I am sure that there are others on this site much more talented in PP than am I.



Reply
Jan 4, 2014 19:54:58   #
mcveed Loc: Kelowna, British Columbia (between trips)
 
Blurryeyed wrote:
Hope you don't mind but I think that it can be fixed, a couple of minutes in photoshop and I got this, I am sure that there are others on this site much more talented in PP than am I.



This was done in Aperture 3 with sharpening by NIK. The sharpening made little difference as the image is so soft to start with. The main lesson here is to check your settings before shooting, not after.



Reply
Jan 4, 2014 20:00:32   #
KlausK Loc: Brewster, NY
 
icke wrote:
Hello ronwande...same here (watching)...probably not (your monitor)... the majority of the posted pics created the asked for "pop" by accentuating/improving color, shadows and or sharpness. This in turn also accentuated some of the flaws of the pic (opinion) ... blemishes, wrinkles, shadows and the probable cause of what caught your eye, tonal value. I personally enjoy this section but wish more people would explain their work flow and others would respond with constructive suggestions...I notice that the original poster has not responded as to what he thinks about the majority of attempted touch ups...to find the facial tonal values in photoshop click ...windows >>>>> info (F8) :{)
Hello ronwande...same here (watching)...probably n... (show quote)


Well - who has been looking at this on a seriously (not by eyeball) calibrated, large monitor?

Reply
Jan 4, 2014 20:48:14   #
marcomarks Loc: Ft. Myers, FL
 
ronwande wrote:
Been watching this one for a few days. Lots of tries, all of them improvements, but on my calibrated monitor most (not all) of them look like the girls have blue skin!

Might there be something wrong with my monitor calibration procedure?


Must be. I only see one in which the girls are green like frogs. The rest all are variations on pretty realistic although a few are a bit too red, over-sharpened, or over-contrasty. None are blue on my monitor...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.