liberals with guns... (Page 6): Where is there any documentation, far less well documented evidence linking these guys to Liberal politics? As far as I can tell there was no documented...

Skellum0

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

Cite the research. The cogent fact that these mass killers were liberals has been well-documented, as has the media's disinclination to mention that fact. And why not skip the personal attacks next time you post. While you may impress yourself, to intelligent readers it shows your intellectual bankruptcy.

Where is there any documentation, far less well documented evidence linking these guys to Liberal politics? As far as I can tell there was no documented evidence linking most of the named individuals to any party. There was a link provided early in the thread, read it and other similar evidence.

The author of that particular piece also asks why those gunmen who were clearly right wing extremists were completely ignored in this discussion.

I believe the media have ignored any political links precisely because it is normally completely irrelevant.

Skellum0

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

Cite the research. The cogent fact that these mass killers were liberals has been well-documented, as has the media's disinclination to mention that fact. And why not skip the personal attacks next time you post. While you may impress yourself, to intelligent readers it shows your intellectual bankruptcy.

Also, where have I made a personal attack? I have accused the type of people who sling out baseless, fact free attacks on any political party and try to present it as truth, as being juvenile and bottom feeders. I have not made a personal attack on anyone.

You, however, have made a very personal attack on me, accusing me of being morally bankrupt.

Think before you try it again. I also resent being to asked to cite sources to disprove an accusation which is yet to be proved. Why is the onus on me? If someone can prove both that any significant proportion of these people were Liberal and they in some way this influenced their action, then I might start to take it seriously. Until then it is just the worst kind of mudslinging.

Skellum0

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

Cite the research. The cogent fact that these mass killers were liberals has been well-documented, as has the media's disinclination to mention that fact. And why not skip the personal attacks next time you post. While you may impress yourself, to intelligent readers it shows your intellectual bankruptcy.

In case your own case of 'intellectual bankruptcy' is so severe you struggle going back a few pages, here is the link provided earlier. There are several more articles from more reliable and different sources debunking the whole nonsense.
http://www.examiner.com/article/the-idea-that-recent-mass-shooters-are-mostly-registered-democrats-is-a-myth

jjwright71 Loc: Lubbock,Tx

Skellum0 wrote:

Also, where have I made a personal attack? I have ... (show quote)

L A scooter ,ya sure got his pantaloomies in a wad ,HAR!

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

Larrymbst wrote:

Our founding fathers created a Supreme Court appointed by the Executive Branch to determine "constitutionally".Fortunately your dumb cartoons and "clever"headlines do not change that. You are an Obama hater plain and simple yet you cannot prove in one instance where the Supreme Court has judged him violating the Constitution.If I'm wrong show me tyhat decisdion and if you can't go into your dark room and hate ...the "KENYAN"

I'm certainly not an obama hater, but upon reflection I do agree with a journalist from Baltimore who opined many years ago;

As democracy is perfected, the office of the President represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day, the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be occupied by a downright fool and complete narcissistic M0RON."
----H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920
AND 93 YEARS LATER MENCKEN'S PREDICTION FOR OUR ONCE GREAT REPUBLIC HAS COME TO PASS DURING THE REIGN OF BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA

Jade Warrior Loc: Sydney, Australia

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

I'm afraid that you have a few lies mixed in with your personal attacks. I was aware of this topic long before I ever heard of the rather witty (and factually accurate) YouTube video.

Ok, Phil Spector isn't a mass murderer but he was well known to have an obsessive fascination with guns. When he did shot Lana Clarkson it was in character. People in the music business were frightened of him.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/3282388/Phil-Spector-flew-into-rage-before-shooting-actress-court-told.html

The fact that he publicly changed allegiance from Republican to Democrat was widely thought at the time to be a cynical move to assist his appeal rather than a genuine "Road to Damascus" type of conversion.

RolandComfort Loc: Saint Louis

Great movie! Our forefathers expected that the Federal Government would provide services like highways, an army, and social security. The United STATES of America was built on state control. Who are these guys in Washington? Federal law should never superseed state law, but so far, they have gotten away with it. The federal government consists of the President, the Cabinet 16 people including the Vice President, 9 supreme court justices, 435 state representatives, and 100 senators. You could put all these people on a a single airplane. They are the new American royalty. They have taken over State sovereignity while implementing concepts like Obamacare, environmental protection, civil rights, and of course, control of federal income tax. These guys should all be fired and replaced with states govenors representatives. I can tell you this, after the federal government near-shutdown a couple of months ago, I'm voting against any and all incumbants, be they liberal or conservative. These guys and gals have to go!!

mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey

hopthecop wrote:

this will "wind some watches"

http://www.youtube.com/embed/FeTCkoXslsE?rel=0

I actually did a some research and was unable to confirm that any of the people mentioned in the video were registered democrats or were liberals. In fact in a few cases the states where the individuals resided don't have a party preference so they couldn't be registered democrats. This same info has been repeated many times recently but nowhere do I see anyone citing a source for the allegations. It would be terrific if it was true, but I'd like to see someone back it up with supporting evidence. Without it I can only conclude this is just an incidence of political propaganda. Some will criticize me for this and say I am stupid or just don't get it. But when we start believing every harebrained idea we read on the internet without asking for evidence just because it happens to support our world view, that's one more nail in the coffin of our freedoms. It doesn't matter whether the lies come from the left or the right, they are still lies.

mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey

Los-Angeles-Shooter wrote:

Cite the research. The cogent fact that these mass killers were liberals has been well-documented, as has the media's disinclination to mention that fact. And why not skip the personal attacks next time you post. While you may impress yourself, to intelligent readers it shows your intellectual bankruptcy.

Exactly where was it well documented? Some of the people mentioned live in states where you can't register with a particular party affiliation. So those individuals can't be registered democrats. This info has been repeated over and over again, but I have seen no documentation that proves anything. I'm perfectly willing to believe its true if someone would just provide credible evidence.

TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails

mwsilvers wrote:

I actually did a some research and was unable to c... (show quote)

"I actually did a some research"?
Where is it. Why did you not post any links to it. That would help.

mwsilvers Loc: Central New Jersey

TrainNut wrote:

"I actually did a some research"?
Where is it. Why did you not post any links to it. That would help.

I didn't post links because they're are no links to parts. You can't disapprove a fairy tale.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado

mwsilvers wrote:

I didn't post links because they're are no links to parts. You can't disapprove a fairy tale.

Then where pray tell did you indeed get your information debunking the post; "liberals with guns", Hmmmm...... :?:

TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails

mwsilvers wrote:

I didn't post links because they're are no links to parts. You can't disapprove a fairy tale.

"You can't disapprove a fairy tale." ????????
Very easy to disprove something that is not true.

I did some research. It is all true. No links because............ :roll:

You should be a farmer because you can provide your own fertilizer.

greymanethewise

Time to bury this post ... it was rotten to begin with and it's really beginning to stink.

TrainNut Loc: Ridin' the rails

greymanethewise wrote:

Time to bury this post ... it was rotten to begin with and it's really beginning to stink.

Fertilizer always stinks. :roll: