Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
How Many Polarizing Filters Do I Need?
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 29, 2013 07:29:54   #
cthahn
 
donmabry wrote:
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a different polarizing filter for every lens I have and I'm looking at step-up adapter rings as the solution. If I leave a ring on each lens and just work with one filter, do you see any problems? I would be stepping up from 52mm to 77 mm with steps in between. I'm concerned that a 52 mm lens hood will not go over the 77 mm
adapter and, thus, I could not use a lens hood. I also could not carry the lenses in my bag with a lens hood attached. This goes back to doing away with the UV filters and depending solely on the lens hood for protection of the lens. I would be interested in hearing any thoughts any of you may have on the pros and cons of what I'm proposing. As well as info on any other solution(s) to my problem. I do mostly landscapes with a Nikon D-7100 and love the polarizer for this kind of work.
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a diffe... (show quote)


Just how many lenses do you need for landscape photography? Learn to use one lens, polarizer for that lens will solve all the problems that you think you have.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 07:54:11   #
Dlevon Loc: New Jersey
 
donmabry wrote:
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a different polarizing filter for every lens I have and I'm looking at step-up adapter rings as the solution. If I leave a ring on each lens and just work with one filter, do you see any problems? I would be stepping up from 52mm to 77 mm with steps in between. I'm concerned that a 52 mm lens hood will not go over the 77 mm
adapter and, thus, I could not use a lens hood. I also could not carry the lenses in my bag with a lens hood attached. This goes back to doing away with the UV filters and depending solely on the lens hood for protection of the lens. I would be interested in hearing any thoughts any of you may have on the pros and cons of what I'm proposing. As well as info on any other solution(s) to my problem. I do mostly landscapes with a Nikon D-7100 and love the polarizer for this kind of work.
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a diffe... (show quote)



You talking about UV filters, or polarizing filters? Different uses. A lens hood will protect your lens.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 09:27:33   #
CTTonymm Loc: Connecticut
 
I wanted a convenient way to organize and carry filters and found the Tamron folding wallet (8 filter capacity) lightweight and has loop for attaching to a belt or a camera bag securely - think it was less than $10 at Amazon

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2013 09:56:44   #
gessman Loc: Colorado
 
donmabry wrote:
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a different polarizing filter for every lens I have and I'm looking at step-up adapter rings as the solution. If I leave a ring on each lens and just work with one filter, do you see any problems? I would be stepping up from 52mm to 77 mm with steps in between. I'm concerned that a 52 mm lens hood will not go over the 77 mm
adapter and, thus, I could not use a lens hood. I also could not carry the lenses in my bag with a lens hood attached. This goes back to doing away with the UV filters and depending solely on the lens hood for protection of the lens. I would be interested in hearing any thoughts any of you may have on the pros and cons of what I'm proposing. As well as info on any other solution(s) to my problem. I do mostly landscapes with a Nikon D-7100 and love the polarizer for this kind of work.
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a diffe... (show quote)


There may be a simple solution but I don't know what that would be. I use one polarizer & step rings. I go from 49mm up to 82mm. Looks a little funny at times but works well. Go five, even thirty, minutes early and do what you need to in order to get your gear set up before the ideal moment arrives. Just do it and be glad you're not shooting a 11x14 on glass plates with uncoated lens.

A screw-on lens hood, rubber, collapsible even, maybe. All this talk about protecting a lens - my, my, whatever happened to NOT being a careless klutz? Ok, fair enough, there are times when things happen in spite of our best efforts. If you're accident prone, get insurance. If you can't afford to replace your equipment if it breaks, you may be in the wrong endeavor. Lens hoods are necessary to keep extraneous light from ruining your images, flare, etc. YOU protect your lens. If you're that much of a hazard to glass, maybe a metal working job or hobby would be good to consider, selling insurance, whatever. 45 years and I've never ruined a lens, "knock on wood." By the way, I don't use a polarizer all the time so for just those special occasions when it is needed, it really isn't that much of a hassle.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 10:24:53   #
lighthouse Loc: No Fixed Abode
 
I have 8. (That is - 8, without any duplication)
Not bragging about it, not ashamed of it.
Its just how many I use.
I also want a couple more.
If you want to use just one lens then go ahead.
But don't expect to put the same handcuffs on others.
cthahn wrote:
Just how many lenses do you need for landscape photography? Learn to use one lens, polarizer for that lens will solve all the problems that you think you have.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 10:46:40   #
Musket Loc: ArtBallin'
 
Rongnongno wrote:
None. Software is doing whatever you need now.... (Execpt taking the picture)


Is a horrible crutch and not a replacement for a polarizing filter. There are somethings that you cannot fix in Lightroom.

OP, you can get a 82mm filter and 82 to whatever-mm stepdown rings. Understand that you may cause vignetting if the filter is too thick.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 11:59:16   #
silver Loc: Santa Monica Ca.
 
donmabry wrote:
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a different polarizing filter for every lens I have and I'm looking at step-up adapter rings as the solution. If I leave a ring on each lens and just work with one filter, do you see any problems? I would be stepping up from 52mm to 77 mm with steps in between. I'm concerned that a 52 mm lens hood will not go over the 77 mm
adapter and, thus, I could not use a lens hood. I also could not carry the lenses in my bag with a lens hood attached. This goes back to doing away with the UV filters and depending solely on the lens hood for protection of the lens. I would be interested in hearing any thoughts any of you may have on the pros and cons of what I'm proposing. As well as info on any other solution(s) to my problem. I do mostly landscapes with a Nikon D-7100 and love the polarizer for this kind of work.
I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a diffe... (show quote)


use the largest polarizer that fits your largest lens and use rings to fit it on smaller lenses. No problems at all doing this. I am sure that you have a lens cap for each of your lenses, use them. This is no problem, just common sense.

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2013 13:16:08   #
Brian Platt Loc: Poole/Verwood, Dorset, UK
 
That is not true, polarising filters can reduce reflections and increase contrast that cannot be done post production. Linear polarisers can have effects that are not reproducible post production. Example skid marks at a road traffic incident in bright sunlight can either disappear or be increased in contrast with a linear polariser.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 13:16:42   #
chapjohn Loc: Tigard, Oregon
 
Have you considered getting a CPL for each lens so it is always on the lens you are using?

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 13:19:19   #
OddJobber Loc: Portland, OR
 
Sorry, John, but I think that's what he's trying to get away from. "I'm getting a little bit tired of carrying a different polarizing filter for every lens I have...." :)

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 14:16:06   #
Peter Boyd Loc: Blyth nr. Newcastle U.K.
 
Rongnongno wrote:
None. Software is doing whatever you need now.... (Execpt taking the picture)


Software cannot reproduce the effect of a polarizing filter.

Reply
 
 
Oct 29, 2013 14:24:26   #
James R. Kyle Loc: Saint Louis, Missouri (A Suburb of Ferguson)
 
OK....

Why not just have a large (i.e. 77mm or larger depending on the maximum size of the largest lens you have) for all the lenses that are in your kit. If you are CAREFUL, and with a long exposure a Must, just hold the filter at the desired angle in front of the lens and shoot. No adapter, just hold it in place. Be sure that you are in the correct position (anything rather than having the sun directly in front of you or behind you) will work.

There are NO software options out on the market that will DO what a GOOD High Quality Circular Polarizer can DO. Get IT Correct as best you can IN The Camera - then edit the best you know how to do. And Never, NEVER, change your original file. It is best to use RAW for just about any image capture.

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 15:38:07   #
Armadillo Loc: Ventura, CA
 
Thunder_o_b wrote:
You could use The Cokin system. One filter, one bracket, you just need the rings for each lens. I have been using this system for many years.
http://www.cokin-filters.com/creative-system/


Thunder,

Let me add a bit to your reply. With the Cokin system we purchase the "P Filter Holder" for the largest filter we will need for all our lenses. Then we purchase "one" filter for each type we need for the P holder. Next we purchase the "Adapter Rings" for each lens we own. The Adapter Rings cost about $5.95USD each.

With this system we do away with vignetting cause by stacking adapter step-up, or step-down rings and stacking several filters on top of each other.

The most expensive part of filters are the filters themselves; with Cokin we purchase one filter for all our len assortments.

Michael G

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 19:48:11   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
CaptainC wrote:
Really...where do people come up with so much mis-information?

..


From the friendly INTERNET ! - It is loaded with mis-information .....

Reply
Oct 29, 2013 19:59:24   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
You can hold a 77mm ( or 82, or 86 ) CPL pressed against the front of a round metal lenshood of a smaller size - though not a comfortable way to do it.. As I have mentioned, I use round metal lenshoods on most all my lenses and leave them on and cap them. I have even glued adapter rings into the front of the hood to accept filters when feasible. But you must make room in your soft case or bag to accomodate this.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.