Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Why do folks insist that Manual is Better?
Page <<first <prev 21 of 37 next> last>>
Oct 13, 2013 18:34:17   #
Murray Loc: New Westminster
 
webbo51 wrote:
I'm a little confused, my D7100 shows, amoungst other options, Auto, P, S, A, M.


d5100 as well,,......

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 18:43:57   #
Rotorhead Loc: Midwest-Fly-Over Country
 
Chuck,

I enjoyed your question and particularly your writing style. Is your pen on manual?

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 18:49:07   #
wlgoode Loc: Globe, AZ
 
Chuck_893 wrote:
Thanks, John, but Nightski already hammered me: "Gosh Chuck, if you don't know, then you shouldn't worry your aging little head over it. If you have lost the passion to create the photo, instead of letting the camera do it for you, then what more is there to say?"
Jeepers, Nightski, I expected controversy, but personal insults? That's a little over the top. I have not "lost passion." I am simply saying that I don't think you have to shoot manual if you already know how. So long as you know what the camera is doing and what you are doing, why not let the thing do some of the work so you can concentrate on the picture? :-)
Thanks, John, but Nightski already hammered me: i... (show quote)


Happy medium- Aperture or shutter priority with auto exposure bracketing. Very quick, gets the shot and no worry about wasted film.

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2013 19:00:26   #
1066 Loc: England
 
Chuck_893 wrote:
I am trepidatiously about to open an ancient can of worms and set off a poop storm of polemic. Before I light the fuse, let me hasten to say that if it ain’t broke don’t fix it! If it’s working for you, stay the course. Stick with the plan. That said…

Why do folks insist that Manual is Better?

I have done due diligence and read back over many, many previous threads on this subject. I get that it is as controversial as Sunni vs. Shia or Protestant vs. Catholic or even RAW vs. Jpeg and can lead to blood feuds.

Probably 99% of my pictures are made in pretty much auto-everything. I adore auto-focus. 90% of the time my camera is in P (Programmed Auto) mode. I’ll guess that 99% of my shots “come out.” 90% of those are terrible, but that’s my fault for having no vision. That said, I know how and when to override all of it. I use Programmed Auto (or what-ev-er) because it lets me concentrate on the shot rather than the how-to-get-it. I read about the spot metering and the this and the that, and I wonder if the whole mountain got up and walked off while some folks were still futzing with their exposure triangle, and I know that eagle didn't wait around..

Before the rocks and bottles come over the wall, let me hasten to tell you that I fully get that understanding exposure is totally essential. What I don’t get is why so many seem to think/insist that the only way to understand correct exposure is to slavishly shoot only in Manual. Correct exposure is correct exposure is correct exposure. 1/125 @ ƒ/16 is 1/125 @ ƒ/16 is 1/250 @ ƒ/11 is 1/500 @ ƒ/8 whether you set it or the camera sets it.

The thing is, I do (understand exposure). I know all about the exposure triangle &c &c ad infinitum ad nauseam. I also fully get that not everyone does. I did not at one time. But I do now.

What I read again and again and again on all the threads on this powder keg of a subject is Creative Control! If you are not shooting in manual, you don’t have it (creative control).

Why not?

One of my mentors long ago said, ”What all photographers ultimately want is to be able to load film between their ears and blink.” To my way of thinking, the modern digital camera comes the closest to that ideal that I have ever experienced. Sometimes I cannot believe the utter sense of freeeeedom!

When I was in school, for the first entire year we were required to make all our assignments with a 4x5” camera and turn in the negatives with the assignment so we couldn’t cheat. We quickly learned “Sunny-16” and all its variants. We learned to use those horrendous old press cameras like Weegee. We got as close as we could with that doddering technology to film-between-the-ears-and-blink. Eventually they allowed us to use our twin-lens 6x6’s and even 35mm. We went into the world and tried to earn a living. Spot meters arrived. Flash meters arrived (thank goodness). Auto focus arrived, slow, klutzy, frequently missed the mark (still does), but it was all getting closer to The Ideal.

My beloved Nikons were stolen from my studio (they walked right past the Hasselblads, presumably because they did not know their value). I had to replace them and discovered that, being self-insured, I couldn’t afford Nikons. I bought a matched pair of Canon T-90’s.

The T-90s had P.S.A.M.!! (Well, TV and AV or something—I forget…) O frabjous day! We were now a giant-leap-for-mankind closer to film-between-the-ears. The cameras even read the bar codes on the film cassettes so I couldn't screw up and forget to reset the ISO. I learned to be especially taken (pun intended) with Programmed Auto (P). It instantly reduced the-client-is-going-to-sue-me screwups by 100%. Need depth of field? Roll the wheel to a smaller ƒ/stop. The camera compensates the shutter, exactly like the coupled shutter/aperture rings on my Zeiss lenses on my Hasselblads. Need action-stopping power? Roll the wheel t’other way. WAY fewer blown exposures due to not paying close attention to the Exposure Triangle. YES absolutely you must know your stuff, but why should it matter if you can just lift the camera and shoot, as opposed to o-mi-gosh is it 1/420 at ƒ6.1 and oh-lordy-a-cloud-just-came-over-I-think-I-am-having-a-stroke… :)

Nowadays I just shoot for fun, but I’m still making memories and blown shots make me blow my top. Now, admittedly I have memorized the manual and know how to use every bell-and-whistle on the camera. I know how to quickly bias an exposure, sometimes by the simple expedient of spot metering somewhere other than the center of the frame, or just rolling the little bias wheel. But I only use manual when the camera refuses to cooperate any other way. I just can't help but wonder at manual-is-the-only-way…errm, rigidity? Strictness?

Okay. I think I’m ready… :mrgreen:
I am trepidatiously about to open an ancient can o... (show quote)


Well, having perused through all of this, I can honestly say I now offer this advice, er...hang on..."Thought"(you have got to be careful on here, LOL). Please could everyone accept whenever you have a camera in your hands, before doing anything, you should first of all, always switch it on, LOL...in a mode that you left it in...after you had been preferably using Manual ... P mode, at least that way, all these differences won't matter. And if something does come along/happens, then you won't be "Fiddling"around trying to sort out your exposure/WB/ISO etc.!

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 19:21:34   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Chuck_893: You ask, "What I am trying to say is, why not use automation as a tool?," suggesting it does as well as other modes.

Answer: Only the photographer can know the result he wishes to accomplish when shooting the photograph.

Thus, while Auto Mode may produce a good exposure most of the time, the photographer may wish to adjust exposure for the best result for the conditions given the limited dynamic range of the camera's sensor.

Further, using flash lighting, the photographer may have to adjust Flash Exposure Compensation for the right amount of flash lighting to achieve the correct balance between this lighting and the ambient light.

In Auto Mode, the camera's system, for example, selects the main subject for focus, and may not select the one suitable for the intended outcome. The photographer has to intervene to select the correct focus point.

Finally, in doing landscape photography, the photographer may wish to achieve the hyper-focal distance for the particular photograph to bring everything from near to infinity into sharp focus.

The list goes on.

I have answered your question.

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 19:46:04   #
saichiez Loc: Beautiful Central Oregon
 
mdorn wrote:
Yep! I had one. Good memory.


As I recall it was called an "Automatic Stick Shift". It had no clutch pedal while it did have a clutch. It did have a joint in the middle of the shift lever with a rubber boot around the joint. When the upper half of the lever was moved in the direction of an adjacent gear, the lever joint activated a switch which then activated an automatic clutch disengagement, while the bottom half of the lever engaged the next gear.

So there was a clutch mechanism in the bell housing similar to a routine clutch, but no clutch pedal inside the car. The lever did all the work, but did it in a similar fashion to a standard transmission. Very tricky indeed.

It was a "standard transmission-hand-activated-clutch stick shift", which was a mouthful if someone asked about it.

That's my recollection. I owned a number of VeeDubs, ie Beetles during the era.

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 19:46:43   #
Los-Angeles-Shooter Loc: Los Angeles
 
Of course, if you want to master, or even attempt, the world of studio strobe, your "brain off and auto on" technique won't work. At all. It also won't work with many forms of beautiful and interesting lighting, both occurring and self-created. It probably won't work well if you use reflectors, diffusers, edge-lighting, hair-lighting, or almost all forms of interesting and beautiful lighting.

However, why worry about creating beautiful and skillful photos? You've achieved a high enough level of mediocrity, and if that makes you happy, why bother to progress and learn and try to become great instead of mediocre?

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2013 20:01:54   #
jrb1213 Loc: McDonough GEorgia
 
F16 at 1/125 is not f8 at 1/500 take a portrait at both settings and you will see the difference, same for a landscape or any thing where you want great depth of field.

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 20:09:45   #
nekon Loc: Carterton, New Zealand
 
When shooting a wedding, because auto exposure and auto white balance, change with every slight camera movement, images can look as if they were taken on different days-outdoor exposure doesn't change much, but it's wise to check at 15 minute intervals, in case cloud movements/other weather elements cause a difference in exposure-and that's where "sunny sixteen" rules

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 20:12:16   #
architect Loc: Chattanooga
 
Not sure if you are still following this Chuck. 21 pages? WOW. Is that a record?

I completely agree with you. Although I choose Aperture (auto) priority 90% of the time, if you know how the camera works, as you apparently do (so do I), then it makes simple common sense to let the camera do some of the work. Or all of the work some of the time. For real creative control, under certain conditions, manual control is needed. And as long as you understand when that is needed, then keep doing what you are doing.

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 20:19:30   #
nekon Loc: Carterton, New Zealand
 
lbrandt79 wrote:
We are just taking pictures.


not me-I'm MAKING images:





Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2013 20:34:23   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
I'm going to jump into the fray. I shot horse racing for nearly 30 years, starting with completely manual cameras. As each new camera presented some automated feature, you bet I used it. It allowed me to be quicker, lighter, and better. I even go to the hated P when it will get me a better image more quickly. When you have to shoot on the fly, all those auto tools sure do help! Then, when I slow down to something like a macro of a flower, I know the auto settings so well, I tend to tweak them instead of going to manual. It's one less or two less things I have to think about. But you do have to know what works and what doesn't. I agree with the one who said that auto settings are TOOLS, not crutches.

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 20:40:34   #
RolandComfort Loc: Saint Louis
 
I shoot real estate pictures part time working with up to 5 strobes placed to light adjacent rooms, stairwells, and hallways; so, I always shoot in manual mode. When you shoot specialty items you can't just let the camera "light" the room for you. Same goes when you have a bright window in the shot. You have to crank the shutter up to the camera flash sync max which is usually 250 then flood the room with the right amount of strobe to fill in the interior shadows. I always bounce the strobes off the ceiling except when I have a dark wall deep in the background. If I can't hide a flash back there somewhere, I light that by adding a snooted strobe that shoots a kind of flashlight beam that does not hit the ceiling or overlight the foreground. Of course, I only shoot RAW!







Reply
Oct 13, 2013 21:05:40   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
Chuck_893 wrote:
I am trepidatiously about to open an ancient can of worms and set off a poop storm of polemic. Before I light the fuse, let me hasten to say that if it ain’t broke don’t fix it! If it’s working for you, stay the course. Stick with the plan. That said…

Why do folks insist that Manual is Better?

I have done due diligence and read back over many, many previous threads on this subject. I get that it is as controversial as Sunni vs. Shia or Protestant vs. Catholic or even RAW vs. Jpeg and can lead to blood feuds.

Probably 99% of my pictures are made in pretty much auto-everything. I adore auto-focus. 90% of the time my camera is in P (Programmed Auto) mode. I’ll guess that 99% of my shots “come out.” 90% of those are terrible, but that’s my fault for having no vision. That said, I know how and when to override all of it. I use Programmed Auto (or what-ev-er) because it lets me concentrate on the shot rather than the how-to-get-it. I read about the spot metering and the this and the that, and I wonder if the whole mountain got up and walked off while some folks were still futzing with their exposure triangle, and I know that eagle didn't wait around..

Before the rocks and bottles come over the wall, let me hasten to tell you that I fully get that understanding exposure is totally essential. What I don’t get is why so many seem to think/insist that the only way to understand correct exposure is to slavishly shoot only in Manual. Correct exposure is correct exposure is correct exposure. 1/125 @ ƒ/16 is 1/125 @ ƒ/16 is 1/250 @ ƒ/11 is 1/500 @ ƒ/8 whether you set it or the camera sets it.

The thing is, I do (understand exposure). I know all about the exposure triangle &c &c ad infinitum ad nauseam. I also fully get that not everyone does. I did not at one time. But I do now.

What I read again and again and again on all the threads on this powder keg of a subject is Creative Control! If you are not shooting in manual, you don’t have it (creative control).

Why not?

One of my mentors long ago said, ”What all photographers ultimately want is to be able to load film between their ears and blink.” To my way of thinking, the modern digital camera comes the closest to that ideal that I have ever experienced. Sometimes I cannot believe the utter sense of freeeeedom!

When I was in school, for the first entire year we were required to make all our assignments with a 4x5” camera and turn in the negatives with the assignment so we couldn’t cheat. We quickly learned “Sunny-16” and all its variants. We learned to use those horrendous old press cameras like Weegee. We got as close as we could with that doddering technology to film-between-the-ears-and-blink. Eventually they allowed us to use our twin-lens 6x6’s and even 35mm. We went into the world and tried to earn a living. Spot meters arrived. Flash meters arrived (thank goodness). Auto focus arrived, slow, klutzy, frequently missed the mark (still does), but it was all getting closer to The Ideal.

My beloved Nikons were stolen from my studio (they walked right past the Hasselblads, presumably because they did not know their value). I had to replace them and discovered that, being self-insured, I couldn’t afford Nikons. I bought a matched pair of Canon T-90’s.

The T-90s had P.S.A.M.!! (Well, TV and AV or something—I forget…) O frabjous day! We were now a giant-leap-for-mankind closer to film-between-the-ears. The cameras even read the bar codes on the film cassettes so I couldn't screw up and forget to reset the ISO. I learned to be especially taken (pun intended) with Programmed Auto (P). It instantly reduced the-client-is-going-to-sue-me screwups by 100%. Need depth of field? Roll the wheel to a smaller ƒ/stop. The camera compensates the shutter, exactly like the coupled shutter/aperture rings on my Zeiss lenses on my Hasselblads. Need action-stopping power? Roll the wheel t’other way. WAY fewer blown exposures due to not paying close attention to the Exposure Triangle. YES absolutely you must know your stuff, but why should it matter if you can just lift the camera and shoot, as opposed to o-mi-gosh is it 1/420 at ƒ6.1 and oh-lordy-a-cloud-just-came-over-I-think-I-am-having-a-stroke… :)

Nowadays I just shoot for fun, but I’m still making memories and blown shots make me blow my top. Now, admittedly I have memorized the manual and know how to use every bell-and-whistle on the camera. I know how to quickly bias an exposure, sometimes by the simple expedient of spot metering somewhere other than the center of the frame, or just rolling the little bias wheel. But I only use manual when the camera refuses to cooperate any other way. I just can't help but wonder at manual-is-the-only-way…errm, rigidity? Strictness?

Okay. I think I’m ready… :mrgreen:
I am trepidatiously about to open an ancient can o... (show quote)


The only time it is necessary to use manual is when you want to over-ride the camera and you seem to understand that.
The end result is the only thing that matters. So why do you care when the elitists push your button?

Reply
Oct 13, 2013 21:22:04   #
Winpix
 
After wading through most of this both the reasonable and the not so I want to wade in with my humble opinion. To be considered a competent photographer a person must be able to control the various functions of their equipment in such a way as to end up with "correct exposure". In my mind correct exposure has at least two definitions, one is when things are rendered as they are ie; white things as white gray things as gray black things as black. A second definition is when things are rendered as the photographer wants them to be. (underexposing sunsets for dramatic effect comes to mind). One can do this with any of the manual or auto modes (that allow exposure compensation) the way the image maker arrives at the point where correct exposure is achieved is irrelevant as long as that person controls the process and makes good decisions. There are times when one way does work better than the others and anyone who is really in control of their camera functions will be well aware of those times. For people just starting to learn the complexities of the relationship among the 3 controls we must deal with often manual control leads them to an understanding that is hard to grasp when the camera makes some of the decisions. Once the photographer has mastered the various functions of each of the three controls and how the various auto modes deal with them then there is only personal choice involved in how correct exposure is achieved. There is no one way to make photographs and anyone who tells you there is is lying to you!!!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 21 of 37 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.