Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out AI Artistry and Creation section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
Canon EF 400mm F4 DO IS USM question
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Sep 25, 2013 16:06:26   #
TrishV Loc: Now living on Whidbey Island, WA
 
Thanks but I think I will still go for Canon EF 400mm at the moment. I forgot to say I do have one lens that isn't a Canon that I use for landscapes and it is a Tokina 11-16mm f2.8 and it is great, highly recommend it.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 17:58:58   #
the f/stops here Loc: New Mexico
 
TrishV wrote:
Thanks for the input about the review - have just read it and it does sound good - photography sure is an expensive hobby but what fun it is. Thanks again.


Trish, I use the 400mm f/4 DO IS L lens and love it. I also have a 500mm f/4 IS L lens and rarely use it any more. It 400 is half the weight, focuses a fast, is just as sharp and as durable!!! I shoot wildlife at Bosque del Apache in NM, Costa Rica, Alaska, etc and find the 400 a joy to travel with. I use it with the 1.4X and find no problems. Great lens!!! See my website for examples: naturephotoworks.com
Rent it for a short experience and you'll probably want to buy one. My best, J. Goffe

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 18:03:35   #
TrishV Loc: Now living on Whidbey Island, WA
 
Thanks for your comments but can I ask what camera you use it with please? Thanks.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2013 18:17:22   #
the f/stops here Loc: New Mexico
 
TrishV wrote:
Thanks for your comments but can I ask what camera you use it with please? Thanks.


Trish, My favorite is the 7D ... but I also use the 5D MkII, the 1D MkIV, and the Rebel 300 when I feel like proving it's not the camera body. Best, J. Goffe

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 18:23:27   #
TrishV Loc: Now living on Whidbey Island, WA
 
Thanks, I just wanted to confirm that you used it with the 7D. Appreciate your time and comments.

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 20:51:32   #
islandboy4147 Loc: Savannah, GA
 
Thanks for your reply. I think it's amazing what you do with Elements 5 and shooting in JPEG. I would expect a reply of RAW and Lightroom to achieve your results. BTW, is there any particular post process function you attribute to the detail ; i.e, unsharp mask, etc? I have fooled around in Element10, Canon Photo Professional and can't seem to get what I would like relative to what you do.

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 05:42:42   #
canonpicguy Loc: San Diego, CA
 
I stand corrected. Its the 400 F5.6 that the extender will not work with. Two very different lenses.

Reply
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
Sep 26, 2013 15:05:32   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
TrishV wrote:
Great comments and much appreciated. The reason I am looking at the Canon 400mm with an extender is that a friend who also uses a 7D tried the Sigma 500mm and was not happy with it so that is why I am trying to get as much info from people who have used the lens as possible. I do appreciate your comments.


Here are a few photos taken with the 500mm lens. All have been very heavily cropped because they were taken from about a 1/4 mile away. The last shot was taken using the Tamron 1.4X TC.

My suggestion to you would be to buy a copy from Adorama or B&H and try it. You will have 30 days to return it to them.

Jim D









Reply
Sep 26, 2013 15:09:41   #
TrishV Loc: Now living on Whidbey Island, WA
 
Very nice - thanks for showing me.

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 15:15:48   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
Here are two more of a Tern flying using the Sigma 500mm and a Tamron 1.4X TC. If I remember right they were about 50 yards away. Terns really can fly fast!

Jim D





Reply
Sep 26, 2013 15:32:45   #
TrishV Loc: Now living on Whidbey Island, WA
 
Thanks - which body are you using?

Reply
Check out Video for DSLR and Point and Shoot Cameras section of our forum.
Sep 26, 2013 16:14:20   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
TrishV wrote:
Thanks - which body are you using?


All these photos were taken using the 7D, same as you are using.

Jim D

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 17:44:11   #
TrishV Loc: Now living on Whidbey Island, WA
 
Interesting as my friend didn't care for it at all, said it wasn't sharp enough. Thanks for your input.

Reply
Sep 26, 2013 18:55:22   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
At this focal length, focus calibration and using a good support are HIGHLY desireable - still, the next best thing weight wise and bulk to the DO is the 300 2.8 !

Reply
Sep 27, 2013 10:23:12   #
oldtool2 Loc: South Jersey
 
TrishV wrote:
Interesting as my friend didn't care for it at all, said it wasn't sharp enough. Thanks for your input.


How old was his lens? As I stated earlier Sigma has made big improvements the last two years in the quality of their glass and lenses.

The other thing many don't like is the size and weight. I weighs about 7 pounds. Even though I do shoot this freehand quite often it is best to use a tripod because of its size and weight. A remote release also is a good idea.

For your info though, the eagles were shot that way. All the others were shot freehand. I couldn't track the terns with a tripod, they were too fast!

Jim D

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Digital Artistry section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.