Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
So, How Hard Would It Be?
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Sep 24, 2013 16:45:42   #
Nightski
 
jerryc41 wrote:
Ultimately, I think we'll just have to deal with this the way it is. If people feel the need to make mean comments, then that's what they'll do.


There is a difference between mean comments and constructive criticism. I welcome the latter, however I understand the the right of those posting in the gallery not to have to endure any constructive criticism whatsoever, and I intend to respect their wishes.

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 16:50:17   #
Nightski
 
dmeyer2m wrote:
But isn't that what the point of having two catagories--Photo Gallery and Photo Analysis? If you post a picture and don't get any "Likes", wouldn't that send a message? We still have the option of putting a request for C&C in a photo post, as well.


I like this idea Dmeyer. You just made the comment I was going to make. If you are getting lots of views, but no likes, you might consider posting your photo in the analysis section if it is your goal to improve. If you just want to have fun sharing things that you've seen and photographed, then you can stick to the gallery and not worry if anyone likes it or not.

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 16:57:56   #
OnTheFly Loc: Tennessee
 
You can tell where I stand by looking at my signature.

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Sep 24, 2013 18:32:52   #
katkase Loc: Grapeview, WA
 
RmcBUDDY wrote:
I agree with Singing Swan. Me personally, when I post a photo for critique, I expect to be told what is wrong with the photo and what is right. I also expect to be told in a respectful manner, no need to be harsh. Let the person know what is wrong with the photo and offer some suggestions for improvement as well. It is also helpful to tell them what is right with the photo if that applies. If people feel as though they are always doing things wrong they may become frustrated and maybe give up. If the photo is not a total mess-up that is nice to know as well.
I agree with Singing Swan. Me personally, when I ... (show quote)


There are many kinds of photographers, the ones that take snapshots and those that try to be photographers. I find that when a photo is panned, many do not look at the photo per say. there was a photo on this site of a bird catching a grasshopper. the lighting was to bright, it was not as sharp as could be, but this was a fast acting situation and for what the photographer had to work with, the photo was a superb one. No one panned the photo as they realized that the photographer could not ask the bird to hold that pose. We come in all sizes of sophistication as far as photography goes. We need to ask, what was the intent of the photographer? What are their skill level? When I comment I try to put myself in their shoes, and sometimes a little encouragement goes a long way.

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 18:45:42   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
[quote=Meives]
dmeyer2m wrote:
I believe that the only value there is to the UHH is that it is for people that want to improve. If you want to post snapshots of your dog, cat, or grand children it would be better in other sites. I hope this stays for as is. I will post comments weather asked for or not. David


Sounds like a downright personal attack with that comment--though the only grandchild I've posted was in order to ask for help with portraiture.

Nothing in this post even comes close to denying anyone the right to post comments.

And I think it deserves to be mentioned that many of the posts of "dogs, cats, or grandchildren" which you deem unworthy of being shared may, in fact, educate or inspire other viewers in ways you cannot imagine.

I don't think I'm alone in saying that every photo I view has elements that I may or may not like and the very process of analysis leads me to consciously emulate or avoid those things in my own work--be it composition, lighting, a tell-tale lack of a polarizing filter that might have blocked out glare or color fade, an angle of perspective, etc.

Sometimes, just realizing the simple joy a contributor gets in sharing his/her photo reminds me why I keep investing in equipment and how far I've come since my first point-n-shoot camera. And all along the way there have people who told me 'great job' when, looking back, those photos weren't at all technically great. Still aren't. But show me a photographer who can please all of the people all of the time.

The only(?) value to UHH certainly IS to help people improve, but don't presume to think yours is the only way to help that process happen. As for "only", you kinda missed the element of friendship. Unless you have x-ray vision, you have no way of knowing how many Personal Messages are exchanged wherein members help each other out.

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 18:50:31   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
Nightski wrote:
I like this idea Dmeyer. You just made the comment I was going to make. If you are getting lots of views, but no likes, you might consider posting your photo in the analysis section if it is your goal to improve. If you just want to have fun sharing things that you've seen and photographed, then you can stick to the gallery and not worry if anyone likes it or not.


You get it, Nightski--I'm stumped why so many have responded as though a suggestion was made to take away their rights to freedom of speech. Must be the politically charged atmosphere. :lol:

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 18:55:31   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
katkase wrote:
There are many kinds of photographers, the ones that take snapshots and those that try to be photographers. I find that when a photo is panned, many do not look at the photo per say. there was a photo on this site of a bird catching a grasshopper. the lighting was to bright, it was not as sharp as could be, but this was a fast acting situation and for what the photographer had to work with, the photo was a superb one. No one panned the photo as they realized that the photographer could not ask the bird to hold that pose. We come in all sizes of sophistication as far as photography goes. We need to ask, what was the intent of the photographer? What are their skill level? When I comment I try to put myself in their shoes, and sometimes a little encouragement goes a long way.
There are many kinds of photographers, the ones th... (show quote)
,

You are most generous and insightful, katkase, and make a very good point about appreciating what it takes to get some photos.

Reply
Check out Advice from the Pros section of our forum.
Sep 24, 2013 19:15:59   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Singing Swan wrote:
So many people seem to want to change this forum. Stop this, make this that way, block this user, stop these comments.......this forum is different from most and I like it because of that very difference. Yep, there are some folks here who have odd ideas, different points of view, lousy photography and great cameras, great photography and crappy cameras.

Once you learn all the ins and outs of this site and how to navigate to different sections, there are ways to know how many people looked at your post, there are ways to stop your in-box from being cluttered with notifications of answers, etc.

This forum is the best window to the world I've ever found. We have folks from all over the world who share their little corner and even with a 'like' button. I still would not have time to view every post made. Some days nearly 200-300 new threads are started.

Just accept the Hog like it is, the good with the bad. I've learned a lot of restraint since I joined this forum. You can't tell every photographer here that their photo is great and you can't tell every fool that they're an idiot, but this is one of the best examples of free speech at work I've ever found. You have the right to say it and I have the right to ignore it....You can post your bad photo or you can post your best.

If it's help for a photography problem, there are sections that will do just that, whether general photography, macro, sports etc. There are folks here who will help you with computer issues, lens problems, camera reviews......shucks, I bet somebody can even give you a good recipe for that beautiful dish of food they photographed yesterday. Yea, this is a photography forum, but we are humans behind the camera and we are not all the same. I would not want responses to be reduced to just a click.
So many people seem to want to change this forum. ... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 19:51:54   #
OnTheFly Loc: Tennessee
 
You asked for opinions and I will respectfully give you mine.
I appreciate your thoughts and efforts. But the only reason I post here is to learn from those who are better than I am. That is why my signature is as it is. Therefore, I would like for the constructive criticism to continue. As mentioned earlier, it doesn't have to be a bashing and if there are any positive things about the photo it is nice to here what I'm doing correct.
I guess that is what the critique or analysis section is for. However, I do post in the gallery because I feel (bad assumption) that the gallery section receives more traffic. Therefore, more opportunities to learn from criticism.
Thanks for starting this thread. Good discussion. And I don't see anything wrong with the ideas as long as they stay in the gallery section and not go into the critique (analysis)section. But, I would only post in the critique section if that happened.
Good luck.
dmeyer2m wrote:
In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've seen several discussions (rants) about the Photo Gallery: being polite and saying thank you to those who take the time to post comments; some saying they just don't have time to leave comments; and slamming those who post 'nice' comments about perceived 'poor' photos.

The administrators will have to respond to this post based on what can or cannot be done with the programming, but here is my proposal.

Add a clickable box for "Likes" alongside each photo image. (Let's just skip the "Don't Like" as it is just needlessly hurtful for the Gallery.) This solution would remedy several issues:
1. People short on time could leave a positive response;
2. The poster would realize how many favorable views his/her photo was actually getting;
3. Comments could still be posted if so desiring for suggestions or to give special kudos;
4. The poster would not be obligated to respond to every comment since the "Likes" are anonymous;
5. Our mailboxes wouldn't fill up every time there is a post to a watched topic--clicking the "Watch Topic" could be optional.
6. Wouldn't that relieve a lot of data sharing on the system?
7. Since every comment re-shuffles the order of the posts, would this not help keep newer posts from getting buried under those getting repeated exchanges?

If this has been asked before I came on board, please excuse the redundancy. It just seems like such an obvious solution, though.


Please add your own pros and cons to this idea.
In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've s... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 20:39:49   #
Clynro Loc: South Jordan, UT
 
dmeyer2m wrote:
In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've seen several discussions (rants) about the Photo Gallery: being polite and saying thank you to those who take the time to post comments; some saying they just don't have time to leave comments; and slamming those who post 'nice' comments about perceived 'poor' photos.

The administrators will have to respond to this post based on what can or cannot be done with the programming, but here is my proposal.

Add a clickable box for "Likes" alongside each photo image. (Let's just skip the "Don't Like" as it is just needlessly hurtful for the Gallery.) This solution would remedy several issues:
1. People short on time could leave a positive response;
2. The poster would realize how many favorable views his/her photo was actually getting;
3. Comments could still be posted if so desiring for suggestions or to give special kudos;
4. The poster would not be obligated to respond to every comment since the "Likes" are anonymous;
5. Our mailboxes wouldn't fill up every time there is a post to a watched topic--clicking the "Watch Topic" could be optional.
6. Wouldn't that relieve a lot of data sharing on the system?
7. Since every comment re-shuffles the order of the posts, would this not help keep newer posts from getting buried under those getting repeated exchanges?

If this has been asked before I came on board, please excuse the redundancy. It just seems like such an obvious solution, though.


Please add your own pros and cons to this idea.
In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've s... (show quote)


I think all of those suggestions would be great additions!

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 21:08:27   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
Eugene wrote:
You asked for opinions and I will respectfully give you mine.
I appreciate your thoughts and efforts. But the only reason I post here is to learn from those who are better than I am. That is why my signature is as it is. Therefore, I would like for the constructive criticism to continue. As mentioned earlier, it doesn't have to be a bashing and if there are any positive things about the photo it is nice to here what I'm doing correct.
I guess that is what the critique or analysis section is for. However, I do post in the gallery because I feel (bad assumption) that the gallery section receives more traffic. Therefore, more opportunities to learn from criticism.
Thanks for starting this thread. Good discussion. And I don't see anything wrong with the ideas as long as they stay in the gallery section and not go into the critique (analysis)section. But, I would only post in the critique section if that happened.
Good luck.
You asked for opinions and I will respectfully giv... (show quote)


Well, I think we're in agreement then. The first sentence in the post states for the Photo Gallery. And point #3 covers making suggestions as before. Maybe the confusion comes from the term suggestions instead of criticisms. Besides, when a poster asks for C&C the door is open for any and all comments.

Reply
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Sep 24, 2013 21:25:54   #
dmeyer Loc: Marion, NC
 
Clynro wrote:
I think all of those suggestions would be great additions!


Thanks you, Clynro. I haven't proposed to take anything away from the current format, only to add an element of convenience for those who want to leave positive comments without clogging the pages.

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 23:43:55   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, Colorado
 
Singing Swan wrote:
So many people seem to want to change this forum. Stop this, make this that way, block this user, stop these comments.......this forum is different from most and I like it because of that very difference. Yep, there are some folks here who have odd ideas, different points of view, lousy photography and great cameras, great photography and crappy cameras.

Once you learn all the ins and outs of this site and how to navigate to different sections, there are ways to know how many people looked at your post, there are ways to stop your in-box from being cluttered with notifications of answers, etc.

This forum is the best window to the world I've ever found. We have folks from all over the world who share their little corner and even with a 'like' button. I still would not have time to view every post made. Some days nearly 200-300 new threads are started.

Just accept the Hog like it is, the good with the bad. I've learned a lot of restraint since I joined this forum. You can't tell every photographer here that their photo is great and you can't tell every fool that they're an idiot, but this is one of the best examples of free speech at work I've ever found. You have the right to say it and I have the right to ignore it....You can post your bad photo or you can post your best.

If it's help for a photography problem, there are sections that will do just that, whether general photography, macro, sports etc. There are folks here who will help you with computer issues, lens problems, camera reviews......shucks, I bet somebody can even give you a good recipe for that beautiful dish of food they photographed yesterday. Yea, this is a photography forum, but we are humans behind the camera and we are not all the same. I would not want responses to be reduced to just a click.
So many people seem to want to change this forum. ... (show quote)


Hear, Hear, most excellently stated!!! Kudos for a fine post!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Sep 24, 2013 23:58:13   #
wrr Loc: SEK
 
this should be part of the registration agreement...nice!

Singing Swan wrote:
So many people seem to want to change this forum. Stop this, make this that way, block this user, stop these comments.......this forum is different from most and I like it because of that very difference. Yep, there are some folks here who have odd ideas, different points of view, lousy photography and great cameras, great photography and crappy cameras.

Once you learn all the ins and outs of this site and how to navigate to different sections, there are ways to know how many people looked at your post, there are ways to stop your in-box from being cluttered with notifications of answers, etc.

This forum is the best window to the world I've ever found. We have folks from all over the world who share their little corner and even with a 'like' button. I still would not have time to view every post made. Some days nearly 200-300 new threads are started.

Just accept the Hog like it is, the good with the bad. I've learned a lot of restraint since I joined this forum. You can't tell every photographer here that their photo is great and you can't tell every fool that they're an idiot, but this is one of the best examples of free speech at work I've ever found. You have the right to say it and I have the right to ignore it....You can post your bad photo or you can post your best.

If it's help for a photography problem, there are sections that will do just that, whether general photography, macro, sports etc. There are folks here who will help you with computer issues, lens problems, camera reviews......shucks, I bet somebody can even give you a good recipe for that beautiful dish of food they photographed yesterday. Yea, this is a photography forum, but we are humans behind the camera and we are not all the same. I would not want responses to be reduced to just a click.
So many people seem to want to change this forum. ... (show quote)

Reply
Sep 25, 2013 09:15:14   #
nairiam Loc: Bonnie Scotland
 
[/quote]In the time that I've been a member on UHH, I've seen several discussions (rants) about the Photo Gallery: being polite and saying thank you to those who take the time to post comments; some saying they just don't have time to leave comments; and slamming those who post 'nice' comments about perceived 'poor' photos.
[/quote]

Response from member to a posting in Gallery:--
Both your camera and lens are much newer, then my set up, it will definitely take these kinds of shots. Play with your camera and try various settings until you find consistency, you may need a tripod or monopod, to get sharp images, by all means get one or the other, since you don't need film, and the cost involved, take many shots and learn and have fun, if you want some help, or have questions send me a PM and I will help as much as I can

My response :--
Seeing a reply such as this gladdens my heart. It sums up the spirit of Ugly Hedgehog. Such a small thing to offer assistance but means so much to the recipient. Please continue your good works and let the rest of us follow in your footsteps. Thanks.

Todays response :-- Please continue this spirit.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.